1960, Starting from the Year of Famine and Getting Rich

For me, a person born in the 1960s who grew up in a mountain village, writing about hunting is really boring because it is too far away from reality. Whether it is daytime hunting or night hunting, it is far away from the author's plot. Regardless of reality, the plot development is natural and smooth. For a novice writer, it is actually pretty good. I give it a thumbs up! Come on!

It looks good if it's plain. Write less about courtyard houses and the like.

I feel like pig's feet are brainless. Is it useful for you to buy antiques and exchange them for meat?

Very good, reminds me a lot of things from my childhood.

Shamelessly like it

The author's literary skills are not good. There is no sense of immersion in the novel, and the wording is dull. Let alone novels, I guess he couldn't write compositions well when he was a student! After just reading the first few chapters, you can see that the repeated conversations with grandma and grandpa are just a few words and excuses, and going to deliver meat to two uncles is a template. The problem with the lack of sense of substitution is that there is no detailed description, understand? Is your Chinese teacher a substitute for a physical education teacher?

The front is very good, decisive and clear! In the middle, I feel like the character of the protagonist keeps changing. In the beginning, he was decisive. In the middle, three years later, he started to grind and complain. He even had no choice but to deal with the aunt's mother's unreasonable troubles. I feel like it was written by different people, or written by several people, and put together!

Plain and true, not bad, not bad

The character design of the protagonist is simply unreasonable. He was a second-rate person in society in his two lives. How could he turn into a passionate young man full of feelings for his family and country after time travel? !

Good-looking, good-looking, good-looking