Apocalypse of Natural Disaster: After Hoarding Tens of Millions of Goods, I Ruined Them

The female protagonist is a giant weakling. She has nothing but golden fingers. She is afraid, afraid and helpless at every turn. The male protagonist is all kinds of powerful and awesome. I don't know if I want to write about the female protagonist's life as a dodder flower. After reading more than a hundred chapters, I can't see any hope for the female protagonist. I'll give it up for now.

This is my first negative review. I can honestly say that this book is terrible. I really don't understand how this high score came about. The author has evil views and is greedy and selfish: before the end of the world, the heroine took the initiative to break into Bao Ma's maternity and baby store and steal things, and she was still justified. The way to counter the mistress is to make pornographic rumors about the mistress. The wording is very despicable, and it feels like it has been done in reality (ps, I am not speaking for the mistress here. The mistress is bad and should be punished, but as a heroine, she should not use the same despicable methods as the mistress. In that case, the heroine and the mistress will have no difference in character. She is just a talkative woman who gossips and causes trouble behind the scenes, and cannot support the role of a big heroine at all). He used two lollipops to get the space that should belong to his teammates. Later, when he helped his teammates go home, he felt at ease and didn't owe his teammates any more. Feel free to take other people's things. It was hard to find a few teammates who didn't understand her true character and were willing to form a team with her. When they searched for supplies with her teammates, they agreed to share it equally, but in order to take advantage of it, they took advantage of the space they had and stole it into their own space. I gave up after reading most of it, I just couldn't stand it anymore. She has no structure, no vision and no means. She only wants to take revenge on her cheating husband and mistress, but the way to fight back is to become a talkative woman and spread pornographic rumors. With procrastinating parents, they don't tell their parents when they have space. He steals other people's property at every turn, with high-sounding reasons. There is constant stocking up in the article, but there is no space at all in the first few dozen chapters. The heroine's community is definitely not a high-end community according to the description in the article. The largest area can not exceed 200 square meters by visual inspection. I don't know how to stock up. The plot doesn't make sense. Similarly unreasonable is buying 40 barrels of gasoline, which can be loaded in an ordinary car. In addition, they are so rich, and they have stocked up on so many goods, and they still eat dumplings all day long. The whole article is like the personal yy of a middle-aged abandoned and resentful old woman. She is short-sighted, selfish and greedy, and has no real ability to retaliate. Even if she imagines herself to be rich in terms of food, accommodation, and transportation, she doesn't know how her life will be easier. She can't even imagine it. That sentence may be accurate. Poverty really limits imagination.

I wrote for a long time, but Space kept saying that I didn't dare to let my parents know, making me hide and unable to understand. A post-apocalyptic story about a divorced man with a baby had to have a male protagonist. It looked like a strange character, and there were many typos, and some of the meaning was not very clear. There is also the space on the bracelet. What passwords correspond to different places, and then upgrading and redeeming things, etc. Are a bit difficult to understand.

The heroine is not hoarding goods to survive in the apocalypse, she simply likes to buy products for zero yuan in the apocalypse without order.

I have stocked up on so much stuff that I eat sour soup and dumplings every day🙄

The whole text is remarkable. Advantages: ① The article is concluded, thank the author for his persistence ②The plot is still very novel, rich in imagination, and not cookie-cutter. The bugs at the end are intertwined and dangerous, which is very exciting. Just a little sad and helpless ③The details are well described, especially the part of searching for supplies, which makes you feel like you are in it. Disadvantages: ① The expression method is a bit single, and many words do not need to be complete: if you do not say them out, it will feel long-winded. You can add description of the environment, or small movements such as expressions to express psychology, which is more attractive than a straightforward running account, otherwise it will be easy to abandon the article. ②The character growth is not in place. The characters basically have their own characteristics, but the protagonist does not have the rank that a protagonist should have. ③There is a problem with the logic. Don't be verbose, in fact, most readers can explain it for themselves.

No, it's the end of the world and a heroine has to have a male protagonist with a child, right? This world is a huge sexual brain

Not so good. The protagonist just ordered some food, but why are so many people trying to grab it? This is a body of hatred. The whole world is an enemy.

I read it more than 100 times and said that one piece of bread and one hundred dollars makes money from the national crisis, hahaha! What would happen if you sold someone a little grain for one million? Hahaha! The heroine is really good at playing double standards. Why didn't Space tell your father? She was still afraid that your father would sell you. I'm speechless.

In the end, your family is alive, and others are still alive. Are you kidding me? You all stayed in space for so many days. It feels very selfish. My friends can save me, so why not save me? My values ​​are wrong. That's the end, what about the follow-up, where are your children? The protagonist is happy, but where is the child? Humanity is extinct? This is just a review of this book, not a criticism of the author himself.