Return to 1995

There are many problems with the logic. Although I don't understand business, at least personal assets and company assets should be separated, especially if the company has other shareholders. It is written in the article that WPP invested 12 million instead of purchasing the protagonist's shares. Even if it states that no less than 50% will be used for company development, the 12 million still belongs to the company and not to the individual. You can buy a house or a car for your own use, but the property rights belong to the company. When exchanging shares with Yahoo, it is written that the exchange is with Double-Click Company. The 13% given should be shared by the protagonist and WPP in proportion. In order not to let WPP take advantage, IQC and email are said to be independent of Double Click, so the protagonist should fund it himself. But if you use Double Click's money to recruit people to develop projects, is WPP being taken advantage of?

It's okay. There are a few flaws. I was so angry at the time that I just opened the comment and it was a long paragraph of text. When I saw it later, forget it. I went back and deleted the comment. If I didn't like it, I just skipped a few chapters. Overall, it's good.

No desire to watch anymore

So-so. Reading to pass the time