
Competition for Deer in the Late Ming Dynasty
明末逐鹿
- Status
- Completed
- Length
- 1.0M Words
- Genre
- Historical
- Subgenre
- Historical Transmigration
- Updated
- 3y ago
- Source
- Qimao
Stats
All-time: Popularity, Must-read votes.
376Chapters
83kPopularity
1.1kReaders
543Must-read votes
8.9Score
777Ratings
Tags
Synopsis
More by this author
Readers also read
The First Warrior
My Backyard Is the Tang Dynasty
From Son-In-Law to the Emperor's Favorite
Training the Southern Song Dynasty
My Strongest God of War in the Tang Dynasty
Shiro
The Rise of a Lonely City: from Exiled Prince to Co-Lord of Kyushu
Three Kingdoms: Yuan Shao Is My Brother, I Will Rule the World!
Three Kingdoms: Starting from Luofengpo
Sanguanjun
My Ming Dynasty, I Have the Final Say
Patrolling the Country
Three Kingdoms: the Shu Han Was a Prodigal, and Wollongong Was Burned at the Beginning
Steal the Country
Reborn as an Emperor
Three Kingdoms: Traveling Through Liu Bei's Adopted Son and Rushing to the Aid of Guan Yu at the Beginning
The Prince Is Fierce: the Waste Prince Creates a Technological Dynasty
Beautiful Mountains and Rivers
Late Sui Thugs
Three Kingdoms: Defending the Border for Ten Years, Li Yuanba Was Signed at the Beginning
Reader comments 2
Google Translate




There are no big problems with the overall idea. There are occasionally a few three-view issues. After all, no one is perfect. Finally, the three Koreans were destroyed, Japan was destroyed, Tsarist Russia was defeated, a constitutional monarchy was established, the navy was established, and Australia was taken over. Pig's Knuckle's governing party has a slight score of 8 points, a governing system of 8 points, a detailed governance of 8 points, a military strategy of 9 points, a military system of 7 points, a detailed military practice of 7 points, an economic strategy of 7 points, an economic system of 7 points, a detailed economic practice of 8 points, a cultural strategy of 7 points, a cultural system of 7 points, and a detailed cultural practice of 6 points. Overall, it is better than all the heroes except Huang Taiji, and with the help of the insights of later generations, it is better than Huang Taiji. There is no particularly outstanding performance, so there is nothing particularly eye-catching in the article. It is better to correct the three views, but it lacks the ability to depict details, especially the details of the overall situation, regardless of politics, economy, military, culture, etc.
How did you get the rating for such a rubbish book?