Rebirth in the 70S: the Story of a Soft Educated Youth Raising a Baby

The best one bounces back and forth, the always sober Gao Liang is as insane as her upper body, the heroine is the master of the Virgin Mary!

Also👌, Mrs. Yu is more disgusting than Mrs. Zheng🤮

Been here and finished reading

The plot is okay, but the author wrote about the 1970s. When I went there, soldiers only had more than 10 yuan a month at that time. The heroine's husband had been a soldier for more than 5 years and saved more than 8,000 yuan. I was speechless. He gave 40 yuan to his in-laws. 00 Yuan, can you be more reliable? I remember the wreaths under the mountains in 1979. The families of the martyrs could only receive subsidies of 100 to 300 yuan, and the money that my husband brought back was more than 4,000 yuan. He spent it out. How many cents were there in those days? Did the author understand that era? I was speechless. The heroine went to buy malted milk and bought 12 cans. I was speechless. In those days, you had to buy less of everything. Can you be more realistic? The plot is completely out of touch with the times. And then, it has to be said over and over again that speculation is not allowed in this era. Then the buyer of the supply and marketing cooperative has to ask the heroine to buy eggs. The supply and marketing cooperative buys 30 cents each. He asks the heroine to buy 60 cents each. I went and was speechless.

There are a lot of typos, which makes it look funny

Very 🉑, the plot is relatively rich, and the story of the protagonist from youth to retirement is relatively complete. The stories of the main characters also basically have a beginning and an end. The plot includes laughter, tears, tension and excitement. 🐎

The male protagonist's sense of presence is too low, he is just a tool

Both the heroine and the hero are okay, and the children are also very well written.

This book really has too much verbose content. It talks about one thing, but as it goes on, it goes on to other content. It goes around in a circle and comes back, and then goes around again. It is said to be about group portraits, but there is too much. The same content has been mentioned above, and it is repeated below. You can say it is not good, but it can be read, it can be read, and it is annoying again.