Dali Temple Case Record

The author has profound writing skills and good literary foundation. He describes the case from beginning to end, and is more particular about the wording and sentences in the details. The original author's forensic expertise was used in the investigation process. There are some typos and minor logic problems, but overall it is better than the same type of Dali Temple investigation books (those who only know about Dali Temple case studies). The gags have no content, and the score is quite high) I don't know how good it is to watch, especially one case that vividly and resonantly displays the feelings of soldiers protecting their home and country, spreading blood on the battlefield, and the righteousness of their family and country. It often made me shed tears, and it can make people fully feel the attitude and sincerity of the author's writing. The work is not finished yet. I just hope that as the plot develops, the author will not forget the original intention, maintain his own rhythm, adhere to the logic and rigor of the previous article, and write within the designed framework. Be sure to ensure the integrity of the overall work. Don't be unreasonable~~~ Come on, come on, come on!

Daily reminder ~ After reading this book, I couldn't help but log in to my account. First of all, although the story introduction is relevant, it is indeed lackluster and not eye-catching at all. When looking for a book in a book shortage, I always read the introduction and read the first few chapters to get a feel for it. At first I just wanted to browse through the introduction, but this book is really fascinating. The writing is delicate, the characters are vivid, and the supporting characters are vividly portrayed. There aren't many typos, but there are some. And! Sometimes the characters' names are confusing. When will Qimao have a function for readers to correct typos... The pace of the story is also okay, not so laggy. Moreover, there are many emotional lines, which are "auxiliary", and there is not much space for psychological activities and emotions. All in all, it looks very comfortable and has strict logic. End with a reminder. Come on, author, I will work hard to save votes so that more people can see the good story~

It's not the fast-paced style that's popular nowadays, but it's very comfortable to read. The author's writing style is very good and the scenes he writes are very natural.

The theme of time travel + fictitious work + solving crimes is somewhat similar to the Tang Dynasty. Sang Yu traveled back in time to an orphan girl who lived in a dynasty that was prone to internal and external troubles and natural disasters, and was kindly adopted by the Song family. However, the Song family was killed overnight, and Sang Yu and her sister were able to escape. From then on, the sisters depended on each other and went to Chang'an for revenge. Because of his extraordinary autopsy skills, he was introduced by Cui Xu of Dali Temple. Since then, he has become a member of Dali Temple, and they have jointly solved strange cases repeatedly. 1. The heroine who traveled through time only brings the knowledge and skills of a modern forensic doctor. At the same time, as a modern self-reliant and self-reliant, Golden Finger is not an exaggeration and is very reasonable. 2. The crime-solving theme of the case is logically reasonable and can echo forensic knowledge and clues. It is relatively self-consistent, but it cannot be studied in depth. 3. What touches the most is the relationship between the male and female protagonists and the protagonists. Whether it is family, friendship or love, it is very moving. The brothers who died in the conspiracy, the lost lover, and the portrayal of human nature in the case are all very good. Highly recommended!

Good! Good! Hurrah! It healed my heart after reading 800 unfinished articles😌The whole story line unfolds like a scroll slowly unfolding, and the rhythm is very steady! The characters are very full-bodied, and each character's own characteristics, mantras, and language habits are not repeated. The shaping is really good. The heroine's path has been steady, and she has not borrowed anyone's influence. She lives up to her name and reality, which is very rare. The way of time travel is also very wonderful. She is not a cliché like being hit by a car. She died in the line of duty in her previous life, and she died a worthy death.，""，，🤣，9.7，！

The writing is realistic and not exaggerated. Singing beautifully. No typos. When the male and female protagonists fall in love, they make it clear directly. It's very good. They don't feel aggrieved. They don't waste their time and feelings by guessing. Worth recommending.

The writing style is good, but there are too many details that are not prioritized. There are too many insignificant descriptions that are too fragmented and cumbersome. The main plot progresses very slowly. After reading a fifth of the book, the main plot has not started yet. The male protagonist's IQ is online, but the investigation process of the male protagonist is basically not written, and it feels like it was all done in secret. He always fills in all the evidence suddenly in the end, as if he was writing it down to make up for it. . .

Like this book very much. Unlike many books, this book is full of love. There is lover's love, brother's love, sister's love. There is the love of elders for younger ones, and there is also the love of friendship. It's so heart-warming to watch. Thank you very much to the author.

The description of the case is really not eye-catching enough, and the steps of solving the case, investigating, and autopsy are very general and passed by in a blur. It progresses very slowly. After reading more than a hundred chapters, I couldn't stand it anymore. There are too many irrelevant details, and I don't see the distinctive characteristics and outstanding abilities of the male and female protagonists. It just makes it boring to read. Give up

Overall it's pretty good, but I have reason to suspect that this article was moved here by an "agent": there are too many typos in the article! But as the author can research the historical background of "borrowing" so thoroughly, he shouldn't make such a simple mistake. It's probably someone who didn't type carefully, not the author. Some places could have been mentioned in one stroke, but the writing was so "detailed". Whether it was a combination of words or for other purposes, it is not something that a commoner like me can guess.