Farmer's Little Wife

The first half of the story is quite exciting, but there are a lot of things in the second half that feel a bit redundant, and the content is also wordy, but the overall story is relatively complete, and the extra chapters also explain the endings of some characters clearly. Overall, the article is good, but there are still a lot of wrong names in the article, and the other is the author's description of the male protagonist. There are too few scenes, and it's already Chapter 300 before the male protagonist appears. I feel like some foreshadowing should have been laid in the early stages. This is a pity, but I still like the author's description method. The language is simple and the introduction is very detailed. It can be echoed before and after. The overall look and feel is still good. I hope the author can make better works.

Too trivial. From an action to a look, from working to digging vegetables, everything is described in detail, but I don't know what the meaning is. Some things are just fine. The plot doesn't move at all. The language is also very boring and makes people lose patience. The heroine doesn't have any golden fingers and doesn't know anything. I gave up after reading a dozen chapters.

A 28-year-old modern man didn't understand anything. He allowed his brother to be bullied and had to eat wild vegetables for more than ten days without food. He didn't even think of a way to get through it. There is no temper at all.

Beautiful, worth sharing

Awesome

Just make do with what you write in the front, but what you write in the back is really weird. 1. The male protagonist is a direct descendant of the Hou family, but his mother is gone. His aunt plotted against him and made the female protagonist wet when she was met by the male protagonist. The male protagonist knew the plan and still pushed forward. The female protagonist later found out that the male protagonist deliberately cooperated and she was not angry. 2. During the New Year's Eve dinner, the male protagonist's second brother flipped the table, which was extremely outrageous. Just seeing the fourth brother eating a big meal, he scolded the younger brother. The male protagonist retorted and flipped the table. 3. I would like to ask if the author was written by a team? The male protagonist's second brother's external image as described before is that of a humble gentleman, and his previous performance described him as a man with some brains. He is not the kind of person who flips the table after just two words, right? What the hell are you writing? Even if you are a very impatient person, no one will pay attention to him. He will just flip the table. There is no reason. 4. After the male protagonist's second brother lifted the table, the female protagonist told the third and fourth brothers that if they were not full, they would ask the servants to give some away. Is that okay? 5. In this Harpy male protagonist, the second brother lifts the table and he doesn't say anything. The female protagonist tells the other brothers that they are not full and asks someone to give them something to eat. The male protagonist says that they are worthy of being younger brothers? ? ? That's outrageous That's outrageous. . . The second brother is always at odds with the male protagonist. He flips the table, plots against the male protagonist, and insults the male protagonist. The male protagonist has no reaction or fight back. But the third and fourth brothers never showed up. They only had a New Year's Eve dinner together. They didn't say anything or did anything. The heroine just said that she wasn't full and asked a servant to bring some food. The male protagonist said that the third and fourth brothers were not worthy of being his younger brothers and told the heroine to ignore it. Can you understand? ? ? What the hell? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?

I like this kind of subject matter, I have watched it for the third time. I am very satisfied with the heroine's IQ.

I feel that the heroine is too small. I think it would be better if the heroine was placed in the position of the third child! It's okay, just enough to watch! Because I don't like to read farming stories with gold fingers and space, so I think this book is okay.

It's not good-looking. I don't know where it got such a high rating. The characters are not distinct, and there are many typos. The word "grandfather and grandson" is written as "grandfather and grandson" in the whole text. There is no discovery or correction at all. This kind of mistake is made by such low-level people. You can imagine how good the writing is.

Full of positive energy,