Abdominal Marriage

First of all, there are so many confusing names, especially the names of two opposite people, and so many typos. Are they reflecting the author's level or checking the reader's academic qualifications? How did this pass review? This is a book praising the mistress's success in becoming a woman. Although the author repeatedly states that the mistress did not want any money other than surrogacy, the fact is that she got the man's money. Ye Feifan's performance in the book is that he is selfish, cold and domineering, but he prides himself on being kind and gentle behind the scenes. He wields a stick against his cousin, breaks up his couple for two years, imprisons the heroine, and is cunning and deceitful in business wars. Is he kind? Leaving the mistress alone in the house for many days without caring about her kindness? This woman knew all this, was abused and hurt, and finally abandoned the second man who tolerated her everything, and went to be with Ye Feifan. Does she have the principles of life? Are you particularly not afraid of how you will face your second uncle after death? What does the author want to express? What is the social significance of the work?

The male protagonist in the novel is well portrayed, he is kind, gentle-tempered, and sincere in his love. Dare to fight and take action in the shopping mall game. Strong sense of the times (I don't like overbearing presidents)

The heroine is still a college student. She is stupid and stupid, has a dark mind, and is a masochist. She makes her feel bad. She doesn't call the police when she is beaten. She deserves it. She is nothing but crying.

Very good

The subject matter is great! Wonderful writing! The sentences are fluent! Don't forget to add some fun! There are just too many typos, maybe it's the typist's fault! Both the male and female protagonists are gentle and kind! Not bad, but the ending can be continued!

Fine

I like the male protagonist very much, and I even lament the unforgettable love between the male and female protagonists. The shortcoming is that the portrayal of the boy's parents, especially his mother, is unreasonable and weird, and his remarriage with Zhang Yan is even more illogical. How could a wealthy family accept a daughter-in-law who has been with someone outside of marriage for a long time! As for the typos, there are so many that the meaning depends on guessing.