NBA: What Do You Mean, an AFK Coach?

A good NBA article. The protagonist builds a championship lineup step by step and wins the championship. There are no outrageous and taken-for-granted trades, and there are no common preset positions such as James, James, James, and Yao Mi. The viewpoint is relatively neutral. No one is specifically criticizing anyone and no one is specifically fanning. There is no national team plot and no chaos. A mess of awkward emotional dramas and business plots. Except for the somewhat abrupt parachute job setting at the beginning and the lack of topics. Except for the first season, there is very little mention of the protagonist's idle command scene on the sidelines. Apart from the slightly wordy character introduction, there are not many shortcomings. The most commendable thing is that there are very few typos.

It's a mess, it's okay to just put your mind aside and just read it as a cool article.

Seeing the stall stepping down, the protagonist shouted to destroy him, but he didn't win the championship for whatever reason. Just like an incompetent husband, I can't stand it anymore

I think this book is of poor quality, with few bright spots and many bad points. The author deified the players' strength, weakened the importance of the tactical system, and regarded the stacking of stars as a magic weapon for winning. This is obviously one-sided. The book creatively transforms Antetokounmpo into a Gordon-like player, which is a reference to the Nuggets' success in winning the championship. However, the cooperation between players, personality, and team atmosphere cannot be mentioned in one stroke, nor is it acceptable to change the style of play. By the way, a team that attacks inside cannot win consecutive championships. It is very easy for opponents to find out the loopholes in your routine. In 1997, the Spurs twin towers, with a group of ordinary players, were able to win the championship based on their personal strength. But the next year, when Robinson retired, they had to find outside help. They did not rely on stars, but on the length of their careers to become a dynasty.

The entire article is an introduction to NBA history, giving you detailed analysis of players and data according to official history. Two-thirds of the players are puzzle pieces without any big names, and the biggest signing is Anthony. There are only a few super giants at the back. The most common sentence is that the topic goes too far. Generally speaking, it is an introduction to the achievements and statistics of each player in history. The main text may not even include 20%.