Ajun's All-platform Hardcore Complaint Book List
阿骏的全平台硬核吐槽书单
Includes books mentioned in Ajun's columns on all platforms on the Internet (see Ajun's personal profile!), Regardless of positive or negative comments. Generally, only some works that are "weird", have "special attractions", or have "typical characteristics" and can be discussed through "hard-core analysis" or even from an "academic perspective" are included. Friends with more discerning tastes can stay and take a break. Use [Jun Style Tags] to accurately summarize the work, such as "farming", "dark flow", "multiple masters", "whether there is an official system", "protagonist's acting style", etc. To quickly preview the type that catches your eye. If you like it, please like it, if you don't like it, please click it. The first platform shall be based on the header. Reprinting without permission is prohibited. Due to word limit, only the first 500-1000 words of each article are excerpted. Please refer to my column for the full version. Welcome to follow (✪▽✪) ~ If you have any special categories you want to see, you can also mention them in the comment area. Comments will generally not be deleted except for robots.
23Strange World Survival Manual
Suspense诡异世界生存手册
Seal The North And South
The new book "I Have a Golden Coffin" has been released! The white fox cries and the living corpse digs the grave... In this world, ghosts eat people and demons eat people. The story has just begun.
The new book "I Have a Golden Coffin" has been released! The white fox cries and the living corpse digs the grave... In this world, ghosts eat people and demons eat people. The story has just begun.
[Jun Tucao·Reading New Books] [Column Quotes] [Reading progress] 50 chapters (completed) [Jun style label] Type keywords: fantasy; time travel; pan-dark flow; pan-suspense flow; Content keywords: fantasy ancient world view, subjugating demons and demons, liaozhai type, no daily routine and no comedy; Character keywords: Decisive in killing, both wise and brave, favoring strength; neutral and good camp (leaning on lawful); no female protagonist; group portrait. [Excerpt from column] Title: Tiger poison also eats seeds: Which comes first, the setting or the routine? Many readers will mention a rationality issue when criticizing the book. Although in most cases this "reasonableness" refers to the reality of the content in the book, I personally feel that the real point that causes the contradictions to be exposed is the unsmooth plot description of the text itself. In other words, is Cube Man reasonable? Unreasonable. Is "The Lego Movie" justified? Reasonable. Is "Lego vs. Monkey King" reasonable? Unreasonable. So is "Lego vs. Monkey King Nolan's Produced Edition" reasonable? Maybe most people would say "reasonable". From reasonable to unreasonable, LEGO people have gone through a process of adapting settings to routines, and routines plus settings - this is what most authors do. They first thought of an idea (setting), then began to arrange various plots (routines) for it, then added more patches and extended interfaces (settings) to it, and finally formed a story (text). So is this process reasonable? Reasonable. Are the results reasonable? But not necessarily. Maybe someone will ask at this time, Ah Jun, weren't you asking at the beginning whether the routine or the setting came first? I think you have explained the process clearly, haven't you? But the order in which two things occur does not determine their priority in future development. In the writing process of an author, he may start from an idea (there are also a few who start from a plot to form a story), but in the "mixing noodles" mode of constantly adding ideas and plots, one side of "water" and "noodles" will always occupy the main body. Did you write this plot just for this setting, or did you add a lot of settings just to write this plot? [For the full version, please go to my column]