Two or Three Books by Tianyi Ju (Recommended Books Must Have Long Reviews)

The style of female porn and the history of male porn are well written and eloquently told. If you like it, you will like it very much, but if you don't like it, you will abandon it like a worn-out shoe. So it's a pity. Six points can be given for writing and style, but no extra points for story. You can take a look if you like.

Don't worry about the worldview setting. If you complain about the worldview setting, you can complain for a year. The biggest problem with this novel right now is the storyboard and narration. Since the author classifies it as a two-dimensional native fantasy, the author would like to assume how the first ten chapters of his novel should be adapted into the first episode of an anime. In fact, it is almost impossible to change. The first chapter is barely understandable as a background narrative, but then, the process of introducing the protagonist involves too many useless narratives and plots, which would all be cut off in the anime. The subsequent trivial experiences lack enough clues to guide the readers to follow the protagonist and the author's thoughts, and the sense of expectation and purpose also need more guidance. Invincible flow is a difficult thing to write about, I hope the author can think carefully before writing. Today's novels only have bodies but no souls, which makes it easy for people to get in and read them. Four points.

In fact, the author's worldview is very problematic, but if a book reaches the point of criticizing the worldview, it is considered nonsense. I will talk about this novel purely in terms of grammar and layout. The writing is very smooth, although it is a bit white, but the smoothness of white is also an advantage. For some reason, it always seems to have a sense of familiarity with the third young master. However, this is already the biggest advantage of this book. The author has not learned to tell a story well. It lacks a complete framework and a lack of succession and transition, making a burdensome story that could have been full of fun eventually become boring. The narrative angle is too far and the lack of sense of substitution is also one of the problems. Four points.

To be honest, the author has a heart to tell a good story, but this is not a good story. I am also a mount-and-blade player, with a difficulty level of 149%. However, the shaping of mount-and-blade in this book is unfortunately only superficial. The author is very stubborn and persistent, which is a good thing but not a good thing. Recommended and encouraged. This book gets a four out of ten.