Three Kingdoms: Summoning Fierce Generals

This book is the best among the earliest Call of the Three Kingdoms series, so this book is very good. Now, if some people think it is a waste of your IQ, you can just write it. Put yourself in someone else's shoes, do you find it boring to read novels written by great writers from ten years ago? It's the same thing, so just read with a calm mind and don't look cynical, okay?

This book was a hit back then, and the author thought he had die-hard fans. In fact, most of them are die-hard fans of the Three Kingdoms. If you don't believe me, just look at the author's subsequent books, and you'll find them all unsatisfactory. The bigger reason is that the author took it upon himself to harden his own fans late in the book. This is really confusing behavior, and few book friends before opening a new book support it. Otherwise, he would still be at the level of a minor god now.

I am a free book lover, which is what you mentioned. But when I saw the author asking for votes, I came over to cast two recommendation votes. In fact, I forgot my account password, and it took me a long time to find it. [Fn=2_4]

Xiang Yu, a man who was forced to commit suicide by Han Xin, actually had 100 points as a basic commander. Yue Fei, a man as famous as Bai Qi, Han Xin, and Li Jing, had only 98 points as a basic commander. From this, we can draw the conclusion that Yue Fei in this book is not as good as Xiang Yu in terms of command.

This author was so irritating to the readers and made Chen Qingzhi so unbearable that he gave up after seeing this. Who is he?

Say a few words. It's really annoying to people nowadays who just follow what others say. I often see people say: "Zhuge Liang's military trash in history was mythologized by the Romance of the Three Kingdoms"; "Liu Bei, he is a scumbag and hypocritical"; "I, Guo Jia, are the best in the Three Kingdoms, if he had not died early..." Since 5 explores history, let's talk about history. The Romance of the Three Kingdoms indeed mythologizes Zhuge Liang, and Zhuge Liang is not as divine as in the Romance. But a non-mythical Zhuge Liang is garbage? Many people say that the evidence for Zhuge Liang's incompetence is nothing more than the comment in the Chronicle of the Three Kingdoms that "it is not his strength to adapt to general strategies!" First of all, this is just Chen Shou's own evaluation. He does not know about military affairs. Secondly, this sentence does mean that Zhuge Liang is probably not good at military affairs, but! Read it in context, and what did he say before? He commented that Zhuge Liang "can be said to be a talented person who knows how to govern, and he can manage Xiao Zhixia." He previously commented that Zhuge Liang was the ancient Guan Zhong Xiao He who governed internal affairs, so the context is roughly like this. Xiao Ming scored 100 on the political test, 100 on the Chinese test, and 96 on the math test. Maybe Xiao Ming is not good at math! ? ? ? 96 Is math garbage? ? ? Continuing with historical facts and not commenting, Sima Yi is awesome, but relying on the Wei State, which is much stronger than the Shu Han, why can it only be defended? Some people say that this is because Sima Yi saw the key to victory. As long as he persisted, the Shu army would retreat. Sima Yi did see it, but that was not the reason why he refused to fight. First of all, this is not in line with Sima Yi's characteristics of fighting. Look at his fighting style in Liaodong. He marched thousands of miles and fought for many days in continuous heavy rain to break Xiangping City. So why was Zhuge Liang so timid in his Northern Expedition? There is only one reason, Zhuge Liang is too powerful; secondly, Sima Yi also tried initially, but they all ended in defeat (including Zhang Jia also died in his attempt); furthermore, the emperor was still watching, and he could end the battle quickly and reduce the consumption of national power, so he should never hold on. Based on the above, Sima Yi could not hold on because he was not sure of Zhuge Liang's victory. Considering the relationship between Shu's national power, Zhuge Liang's military capabilities are stronger than Sima Yi's. If Zhuge Liang is military garbage, then Sima Yi is... Understanding history, we can see that many military masters admire Zhuge Liang very much, including Li Jing and Yue Fei. Zhuge Liang is also one of the Ten Philosophers of the Martial Temple. Although the Martial Temple has changed many times, Zhuge Liang is still among the Ten Philosophers and has never changed (there was no Romance of the Three Kingdoms at that time), so Zhuge Liang's military ability is not only not weak, but also very strong. Let's talk about Liu Bei. Since we are talking about history, let's put aside the Romance of the Three Kingdoms. So why is Liu Bei hypocritical? ? ? Baffling. Isn't Liu Bei's hypocrisy written in the novel? Historically, Liu Bei was a person whom even Cao Cao had a favorable impression of when they first met him. There were also many outstanding figures at that time who were friendly with him even though no one said he was hypocritical. How did you know that he was hypocritical? Liu Bei was actually probably the most handsome of the three monarchs... And very same-sex attractive... Well, that's it. As for Guo Jia, many people praise him because of Yi Zhongtian. But his "ten wins and ten losses theory" is actually just rhetoric. In short, it's just one sentence, Boss Cao, you are worse than Yuan Shao. Well, it also helped stabilize Boss Cao's determination. Above

But unfortunately, the weather did not go as planned. Suddenly, sporadic raindrops fell on Jia Fu's face, which was warm and cold.

I originally read it day and night, but I ended up seeing the author arguing with some readers and writing a general to death with all his heart. I had been optimistic about Chen Qingzhi since he was summoned. Although he never performed well, I naively thought that he would make a great contribution. As a result, the fans praised Chen Qingzhi to death. Motives cannot lead to great results. I read the next three books and they are like eunuchs. It is really not suitable for writing books. I should change my career.

This author is the most cool person in the starting point, and he personally goes out of his way to make readers feel bad about himself. Hahaha

The most toxic aspect of this book is off the charts, and how many people have abandoned it because of it?