Rebirth of Farming Life

I haven't read the book yet, but I read the author's third-party female protagonist problem. The appearance of the female protagonist caused the male protagonist's marriage to split. He said that the female protagonist, the male protagonist, and the male protagonist's wife were all right, but they just didn't meet the right person. This modern irresponsible saying is actually used in ancient sayings. Not only does love account for most of the responsibility in marriage, a marriage that only relies on love will not last long. The various ancient rules for women will not allow the indigenous ancients to divorce or divorce easily. Excuse me, the male protagonist had a wife and children in the ancients. Since he wanted to be with the female protagonist at all costs, why did he follow the arrangement and marry someone he didn't love in the first place? How is this different from the ancients saying that he spoiled his concubine and destroyed his wife? It is also different from the modern third party who pretends to be innocent and destroys other people's families. The female protagonist knows that the male protagonist has a family and children, so why doesn't she stay away and find another love of her own? Is the male protagonist the only man left in the world? In other words, if the male protagonist is just an ordinary man, will the female protagonist still want it? Speaking more radically, if your father fell in love with another woman and wanted to divorce your mother, would you completely side with your father and let your mother give up her position happily? There is nothing interesting about this kind of book that defends a scumbag male protagonist and a scumbag female protagonist.

I accepted it so quickly after traveling through time...