
Modify the Three Kingdoms
修改三国
- Status
- Completed
- Length
- 1.6M Words
- Genre
- Historical
- Audience
- Male
- Subgenre
- Qin-Han & Three Kingdoms
- Updated
- 15y ago
- Source
- Qidian
Stats
0Monthly votes
6.1kRecommends
18.1kFans
413Chapters
Tags
Synopsis
Reader comments
Readers also read
In the Red Mansion: Escort Daiyu to Beijing at the Beginning
I Built a Cave in the Three Kingdoms
Little Landlord of Ming Dynasty: I Am Really the Descendant of the Dragon!
The Republic of China: Rise from the County Seat
Three Kingdoms Keepers of Households
War of the Three Kingdoms
The Most Powerful Soldier in the Three Kingdoms
Three Kingdoms: Ji Han Liu Zhang
Sui and Tang Dynasties: from Killing Enemies and Picking up Attributes to Becoming the Emperor of All Heavens
Mixed in the Three Kingdoms Fighting for the World
Call of the Three Kingdoms
The Rogue Soldier King of the Three Kingdoms
When I read Chapter 8 of Volume 2, I really couldn't stand it anymore. The writing is too childish. Especially those who took the oath to send troops to attack the Yellow Turbans made a speech. Fighting against the Yellow Turbans is like fighting against foreigners. The Yellow Turbans are also ordinary people who cannot survive. What did you say on stage to kill my wife and children, seize my land, insult my majesty, kill, kill, kill. The morale of the soldiers below was still high, and the scholar praised him from the bottom of his heart. Vomited, okay~_~. Soldiers are also at the bottom, and they will only die when rabbits die and foxes will be miserable. The great scholar will only think you are a fool.
If you don't know how to write high-IQ questions or write speeches, you can copy them on Baidu. Or let the protagonist take the route of defeating monsters and upgrading with one force to reduce ten wisdoms. Why does it have to be nondescript? It's uncomfortable for you to write, and even more uncomfortable for you to read.
If you look at this thing, your IQ will go wrong.
This kind of novel is just for killing time. If you take it seriously, you will lose.
This was a book ten years ago, so I don't think there's anything wrong with it. What the hell are these people commenting on?