Emperor Yongli

The values ​​of the Mongolians are different from those of the Han people. The author said that Galdan was wrong to detain the relatives of the Mongolians in Monan. When Yongli fled from Longqing, he lost his wife, which caused a lot of scolding. But Temujin lost his wife to others, but no Mongolians scolded him. When the grassland encountered a white disaster, the entire tribe huddled in the yurt to avoid the cold and keep warm. The middle ones were the mature men, followed by the children (boys), then the adult women, and the outermost were the old people. Why? Because the core of the tribe is adult men, as long as there are adult men who are warriors alive, then the tribe will not perish. Therefore, it is useless for the Mongols to take hostages.

Regarding cavalry, the author has some misunderstandings. The cavalry that can charge into battle is heavy cavalry, while the Manchu and Qing cavalry are obviously not heavy cavalry. The Manchu and Qing Dynasties opened their mouths and said, "Old Khan started his army with thirteen pieces of armor" instead of starting with thirteen horses. Why, because the main force of the Manchu Qing Dynasty was heavy infantry, even if it was the majority If there are horses, they are also mounted infantry. After encountering the enemy, they dismount and shoot with their rifles. Then Bagala leads the charge. The biggest advantage of the cavalry is mobility, not charging. Otherwise, how do you think the Spanish phalanx and Gu Erye's phalanx defeated those European cavalry who were far more powerful than the Mongolian horses? When the Khitans were at their strongest, they did not dare to act recklessly in the face of Brother Yin's strict infantry formation. How about the Manchu Qing Dynasty, the weakest among the northern barbarians in history?

I saw this book in the recommendation, clicked on it and looked at the cover of the book. The title was still written in traditional Chinese. It doesn't matter if it's traditional Chinese, but you wrote it correctly. In traditional Chinese characters, the word "li" for history and the word "li for calendar" are not the same. The correct way to write it should be Yongli. Seeing the author's level, I didn't even have the courage to read the first chapter.

After reading more than half of it, I felt that the book reviews were a bit extreme. First, the writing style of this book is indeed inexperienced, the plot design is average, the description of the war is too simple, the historical foundation is insufficient, etc. But these are not the shortcomings of this book. And the author also said that this is his first book. I think I can accept it myself. Second, the author at least has no eunuchs. There are no eunuchs in the first book, which is already good. Moreover, the author also modifies the plot of the book based on readers' opinions, which even affects the advancement and subsequent direction of the plot. Of course, some people say that the author has no outline at all, and I do not rule out this statement. Because there are indeed many holes that are not filled in or are not filled in time. Third, I would like to give some personal suggestions to the author. Since you write historical novels. Then at least you should have a clear understanding of the history you want to write about. (Of course, no one has experienced that time period, but some basic well-known historical contents are still different.) Secondly, since you want to get out of the Ming Dynasty and go to the world. Then at least you understand the geographical location. There is a place in the book where it is written that the Ottomans were in northeastern Russia. Didn't the Ottomans add parts of Eastern Europe and parts of the Middle East to what is now Türkiye? You said that Russia is in the northeast of the Ottoman Empire, but that barely makes sense.

I have another question, Xiaozhuang, this is a posthumous title. Author, can I tell you what a posthumous title is? In your novel, Bumbutai calls himself Xiaozhuang when he is alive?? The same mistake as in the TV series "Kang Mazi",

What's the use of having already arrived in Burma? All the loyal ministers and good generals who are loyal and capable of fighting are almost dead. How can you rely on yourself to fight back?

The author's historical foundation, literary foundation, industrial knowledge, and scientific knowledge are all very lacking, and the article becomes "full of nonsense" as soon as it is written.

Does the author have a wrong understanding of the land enclosure movement? Not only was the land occupied by the Eight Banners, but the Han people on the land had to become the bannermen of the banner. Or do you think Fulin's "Fugitive Law" was promulgated?

It is extremely poisonous, and people who know a bit about history will not be able to stand it. There are so many poisonous points that I will not list them one by one. Moreover, scholars obviously do not have an outline when writing, and they write wherever they think. The protagonist has a low IQ, so the supporting characters have even lower IQs.

That's ridiculous, the author's historical foundation is a mess