Detective Conan: Becoming Tokyo's Top Lawyer from the Start

It's good to read, but for a Conan fan, this novel is too slow. If you're tired of traditional Conan fandom and want to change your taste, you can read this novel. There are still some laughs and fun moments, but it's really too slow.

The beginning was exciting, but the expansion of the Golden Finger field in Chapter 20 was really off-putting. The idea of ​​a lawyer is brilliant, and the problem can be solved according to realistic logic, but a deus ex machina-like superpower has to appear halfway through, which is very confusing. I hope the author learns his lesson and works hard for the next book.

🎭 Character: Lawyer Ke Xue 🎬 Plot: The plot is exciting, but the appearance of Goldfinger is a little abrupt ✒️Writing: smooth and medium to upper level

I don't want Xiaolan to be the heroine, I feel bad

Lawyers are more famous for their book Gu Meimen

I'm thinking if I want to take the red route, how about red with black?

I originally thought I had skipped something. The field was too abrupt. Moreover, it is not just the effect that is explained, but how to sew it together with the world view is more important. From my personal explanation, this is more like a mixture of Persona and Ace Attorney in terms of gameplay.

The biggest flaw: The lawyer character mistakenly quoted Article 218 of the Criminal Procedure Law and claimed that this was "privately collecting evidence." Article 218 only restricts police/prosecutor warrant searches and seizures, and does not regulate private evidence collection at all. There is no legal concept of "private collection of evidence" in the law. ​Confusing evidentiary ability and probative power: The article says that "physical evidence cannot be used as evidence if there is no witness, no photos are taken of the original state, and the evidence is contaminated." It is inconsistent with Heisei law. These questions can only be used to question the credibility of the physical evidence (probative force) and will not directly disqualify the physical evidence from being submitted to the court (evidential capacity). ​Reasoning ≠ Subjective conjecture: indirect reasoning cannot be directly characterized as subjective conjecture simply because of the lack of scientific testing; the Heisei trial allows for convictions based on a complete chain of indirect evidence. Underlying roots: The author of the novel applied China's criminal investigation physical evidence storage and witness rules to Heisei Japan's criminal litigation system; in reality, Heisei defense lawyers would not use this set of words to cross-examine.

The biggest flaw: The lawyer character mistakenly quoted Article 218 of the Criminal Procedure Law and claimed that this was "privately collecting evidence." Article 218 only restricts police/prosecutor warrant searches and seizures, and does not regulate private evidence collection at all. There is no legal concept of "private collection of evidence" in the law. ​Reasoning ≠ Subjective conjecture: indirect reasoning cannot be directly characterized as subjective conjecture simply because of the lack of scientific testing; the Heisei trial allows for convictions based on a complete chain of indirect evidence. Underlying roots: The author of the novel applied China's criminal investigation physical evidence storage and witness rules to Heisei Japan's criminal litigation system; in reality, Heisei defense lawyers would not use this set of words to cross-examine.

Wow! Share! Surprise! First time monthly ticket holder