China Entertainment: Keywords Start from Release

Introduction: It's okay to take advantage of the popularity of immortals. The problem is that it's a bit too much to satirize people's lack of vision in novels after taking advantage of the popularity. And they also used blind sisters to star in those years. Doesn't this mean that blind sisters are more discerning than immortals?

There are too many inner dramas. Don't look at things before 2010 with the mentality of 2026. The situation is different. There are all kinds of belittling. I really can't stand it anymore.

It's funny. I can get through the first few chapters, but then I feel like it's a bit of a stream of consciousness. I'm writing prose.

✒️Writing: 10% character behavior + 30 character thoughts + 60% author output Each chapter has a plot outline of about a hundred words, and then crazily filled in with character ideas and various author's views on things in the current chapter. It looks like it's watery, but in fact the plot is advancing at a slow pace, because for a plot of about a hundred words, others usually have to write a thousand words. While you are still understanding this short outline, the author suddenly attacks you with a bunch of output, making it painful and divergent to read. 🎬 Plot: The plot is generally old-fashioned, but the wide range of plug-ins makes it unrealistic. This kind of lazy plug-in really doesn't work. 🎭 Character: The protagonist's pure heart is as high as the sky, and the author emphasizes this character many times, which is very unpleasant.

What about writing instructions? A little bit of nonsense should start from the big bang of the universe, and it can't be watered down anymore.

The incense belongs to Ning Hao, so at least you can make an original one or an adapted one. While complaining, I copy the answers myself, and I laugh every 100 steps.

Chapter 9: Communicating with foreigners is like translating on a computer

Can Qidian have a function to block authors?

You can use as little water as possible. Especially try not to talk to yourself, it will look awkward.

There's too much nonsense, it's all nonsense, there's no character dialogue or emotion at all, it's hard to get involved at all.

The writing is a bit dry and isn't it all about the Golden Three Chapters? Many of them have never seen the wonderful Golden Three Chapters. The existence of the system and my own thoughts say too much. It may test some of the readers' patience. Please keep it and take a look.

This book is the first time I feel dyslexic. There are too many inner descriptions, and there are punctuation problems, dialogues are unmarked, and the wording is a bit confusing. Anyway, I feel that reading is very difficult. The typesetting and other things increase the dyslexia. Moreover, the author uses less Internet vocabulary. Not everyone can surf at high speed. When you write about old America, you have to use Shituoling instead... Is old America a banned word? Only by lowering the threshold and making it comfortable for more people can you make money. Only by being suitable for the general public can you expand your fundamentals. Moreover, I can see that many people in the entertainment industry can write their names in other books. I don't know why you don't write them and use abbreviations instead.

What makes you think that she can appear in any drama she wants and play any role she wants? Even if your father is a "mountain eagle", he's not that awesome, right?

Is this the author's non-stop complaint? Most of the chapter is filled with non-stop output, and the protagonist is like a puppet on a string.

Author, the subject matter you write is quite good, but you can't write the novel as an essay and an inner monologue. It doesn't make people feel involved at all, and it's all here and there. It's boring. Abandon the book, bye

In 2002, there might still be a market for novels in those years, but movies would definitely collapse. The main consumers of youth movies were still in school. Not to mention that youth before the 80s and after the 80s are different.

Your writing method is not suitable for writing online articles You are suitable for writing traditional first-person novels. It's not that your writing skills are bad, but... It really makes people's heads hurt when they look at it.

It's pretty good. I'm not looking at things in the past from the perspective of now. I'm so disappointed.

How great can Chinese movies be if you give all the best-selling movies to pigs' feet?

Inexplicably, I was writing the plot and reading comprehension at the same time, and the author's and the reader's work were done together!

Very good to complain about

How to put it? I mean, I wanted to write the protagonist as cold and aloof, but I still wrote it as a licking dog.

The writing is a bit deep. If you write an entertaining and enjoyable article in a Machiavellian and conspiracy direction, that's not right. Give up the good and pursue the bad.

There is something! Quite like it. Stick to the style, those who like it will still like it, and those who don't like it will still dislike it if they change the style. There is nothing that everyone can like.

I feel like this subject matter is very good, keep up the good work! Stop being a eunuch!

I really don't understand. Which person is it expressed in? Do those people who say they look good have faces?

I just saw someone clarifying what I wanted to say, and there was too much drama in my heart.

I'm a dissatisfied fan of Liu. I read the comment section and read the comments, so I went to watch it. Halfway through, I felt something was wrong. There is no telling about her dark history at all, and she is still a director with a plug-in, arranging films normally. See too much. This novel feels like it has no characteristics to me. It's just plain and simple. Very boring.