
A Thousand-Year Clan, Beginning with King Wu's Campaign Against Zhou
千年世家从武王伐纣开始
- Status
- Ongoing
- Length
- 236k Words
- Genre
- Historical
- Subgenre
- Alternate History
- Updated
- 2mo ago
- Source
- Qidian
Synopsis
72Chapters
0Votes
439Recs
10Fans
More by this author
Readers also read
Dawn of Chongzhen 1627
When I Was in the Red Mansion, I Saw Lu Zhishen Uprooting a Weeping Willow Tree.
Traveling Through Cao Zhang: Beginning with Jie Hu Zhenmi and Seizing the Direct Descendants
I Was About to Rebel When Li Shimin Put on a Yellow Robe for Me
Infinite Terror: The Rise of an Ordinary Reincarnator
Do You Know: Rule the World?
A Century-Old Family from the Qing Dynasty to the Republic
If You Do Not Reject Me, My Lord, I’ll Take You as My Godmother
Back to 2003: Taking LeBron's Path
Please Call Me Your Majesty, the Tsar
Bold Official, Who Asked You to Change the Law?
Show Song Changge
Xuanzhen!
Reader comments 22
Translated by Google Translate
This kind of novel is okay in the early stage, but will collapse in the middle stage. History cannot be changed, and I can't deduce it. What can I write about it?
Why don't you refer to the source? The completion of the Western Zhou Dynasty chapter of that book is a masterpiece.
What the hell, monogamy in ancient times was not afraid of extermination 😒
And the Book of Songs does not need annotations. The literal meaning of the Book of Songs is this. For example, Guan Guan Jujiu, in the River Continent, this is the literal meaning, Guan Guan Jujiu, in the River Continent. The meaning of this sentence is actually the literal meaning. There is no need for annotation at all. Everyone needs to pay attention to it, just to cover up the hurt. My king and Zhou Gong all like priests, no matter what they do, they have priests. Essentially, it is to safeguard the interests of the old class, and it is not just a matter between states and merchants. Grassland is also involved, Chu State is also involved, and Bashu is also involved.
The author is playing the game stupidly, is it exactly the same? You might as well get a soldier who never tires of deceit and push him through.
When you see the equipment card, you know that you are ready to turn the tide again. I have commented on this type of article. Except for the late Ming Dynasty, which you saved, or add the late Southern Song Dynasty, you do not need to save other periods. What you want to write about is the survival of the family. You have set all kinds of tricks on the family. As a result, China's history cannot change much. There are too many changes for the author to write. In this case, why are you playing tricks? It is already a big deal if the protagonist can guide the family to take sides. During the war, the protagonist activates the golden finger to guide the family to take sides. In peacetime, he writes about the daily life of the family, the education of the clan members, and the growth of the younger generation. You can't write big words, you have to write small ones. What you want to write about is how the family survives and survives in various historical processes in China. What you want to save is not the various historical events, but how the family rose up after its continuous decline. The authors of this type of article usually operate as fiercely as tigers. The record is 250, how awesome the family is, and the history has not changed much. At most, the timeline is changed, and the protagonist's family replaces historical celebrities from various periods in history.
It's boring. This kind of book is just a betrayal of the country and a bet. It always stands from the perspective of the historical winner. Whoever wins is the master.
A thousand-year-old family? Don't you know how disgusting the aristocratic family is?
Sadly, the author started using AI. There is nothing wrong with using AI. The key is that you still don't understand how to use it...
Zhang Liang was killed too hastily, right?
As the title states, I actually don't quite understand why the Liang Kingdom was destroyed in the early Warring States Period. According to the inference in the article, the Liang State has Confucianism, political strategists, Legalism and even Taoism, and there is also a school of thought created by the king. This grand occasion of hundreds of schools of thought contending, coupled with the fact that Duke Wu died only a few decades ago, and there is no mention of how his successor collapsed (or maybe I didn't pay attention), gave me the impression that he was like a conservative king, and then was inexplicably destroyed by Qin, and Shang Yang's reform even borrowed the laws of Liang State. So I see that I don't particularly understand now.