History Anchor: All My Fans Are Emperors

It's okay to like Qin Shihuang, but don't think twice. Did Qin Shihuang bring down the Qin Dynasty with one sword and one shot? I can't even say this even if I have a little common sense. It's too licking. What the fuck, was I eaten by a dog in my sixth life? Has the coolest guy from the past been forgotten? Is the death of the second generation all someone else's problem? Would it be better to go slower? You first fulfill the promised military merit system and then talk about other things.

That guy who killed everyone in the court, I thought you were Xiang Yu or Constantine. It was so humorous to be killed by the Crooked Neck Tree alone.

Generally speaking, the writing is okay, but there are two problems. 1. The real life of the protagonist is not well written 2. The hero group in the early Han Dynasty is too beautified.

Do you really think that ancient emperors would be angry when they saw people from later dynasties being slaughtered? Anyway, I don't believe it.

It is thankless to include too many female protagonists in the emotional category. You are definitely not subscribing to this book because you want to see the protagonist fall in love in real life. It is so difficult to write about love. If you write it badly, it will ruin the whole article. If there are problems, many people will abandon the book. If you want to have a real relationship with the protagonist, there are other ways to write it. For example, after the emperor and famous generals know the protagonist's situation, they provide resources and strategies to help the protagonist become bigger and stronger, or the protagonist cooperates with society or national resources to provide ancient China with better development plans and even technology. These are definitely better than love interests.

What was written at the beginning of this book is okay, so why is there no traffic? Is the traffic at the starting point now so bad?

Is this book going to cover all the emperors of the Han Dynasty?

The First Emperor should at least let the court know what he wanted, and then let the court analyze the quality of doing it and decide whether to do it and how to do it. Finally, he would make a prototype to decide which plan. Not saying anything or communicating with the officials will make the court very passive. It takes time to do things and issue policies and rules, and it cannot be done with just one order. The people will not react immediately, and there is a high probability that they do not even know about it It will take at least a year and a half for Qin Shihuang to finish the corvee affairs 😐 The first emperor's normal operation is to watch the protagonist's discussion here and keep things in mind. Then take the matter out and discuss it with the officials, assign non-conflicting operations to one phase, and then make changes step by step.

The book is quite good, the viewpoints are okay, and there is no unofficial history. A few suggestions, that is, I think it is better to add settings with different time flow rates. Otherwise, the modern version will be updated after only a few days. The ancient government decree has not yet been issued, and the effect will be ineffective and then accept the new point of view. After all, it takes time for policies to show their effect.

The writing is good, but the content of the video made by the protagonist is too little. Those who know the history feel that it has skipped too much. Those who don't know the history can't see the reason. I hope it can be improved.

It has the same nature as the historical Tianmu text, and the progress is much slower than Tianmu, because the corresponding emperor was only released after posting a video about the emperor.

Qin's problems are too many and complicated. Issues left over from history: It is true that the second generation of the Qin Dynasty died, but the Qin State is an "old" country that has experienced the Spring and Autumn Period and the Warring States Period. Its internal contradictions have always existed. After the unification of the six countries, there is no external pressure, and internal contradictions will inevitably break out. The Qin Law Issue: The Qin Law, which has been criticized by people, bears the scapegoat that it should not bear, regarding the popularization of culture, transportation, and the central government's control of the grassroots in the pre-Qin era. There is a question mark on how much Qin Law is still being implemented and the intensity of its implementation. The most favorable evidence is the Chen Sheng and Wu Guang uprising. The latest archaeological research concluded that only fines and armors were imposed. This makes it seem like the Dazexiang uprising was a conspiracy. I don't think so. This is a vertical comparison of the Kuomintang's recruitment practices during the Anti-Japanese War and Liberation Period. They added layers of pressure, rampant bureaucracy, and cruel and bottomless exploitation of the people. I don't think that in this regard, the pre-Qin period The morality of officials is higher than that of the Republic of China The theory of five big tile-roofed houses The transition from the founding of a feudal state to a unified dynasty Unity of thought The treatment of old interest groups and the cultivation of new interest groups The disadvantages of classical militarism All these deep-seated problems were finally manifested in the various tyranny of the First Emperor. We are now discussing the issue of the Qin Dynasty. It is meaningless if we only focus on Qin Shihuang's violent conquests, spectacles that harmed the country, and tyranny. An article "On the Passage of Qin" has made it very clear and exhaustive in this depth; online articles have been around for so many years, and depth is also needed, especially historical ones. After all, there are so many works, and readers will not be interested in works without new ideas after reading too much. In the field of historical articles, depth and perspective are new ideas.

Is it serious to use 18-year-old Han Xin as your handsome man?

As long as the eunuch can write 800 chapters

From the Qin Dynasty to the Ming Dynasty, they directly treated the Qing Dynasty as separatists.

It seems that there is something wrong with the writing of your collection data. The subject matter is good, but your writing is not very good. 1. Describing the deeds of those emperors is not fun, just like translating history books into vernacular. For example, the recent appearance of Liu Xiu gave me the feeling that this person is Liu Xiu, and his arrival is like a running account. This won't attract readers. After all, you want to see history, so why not watch the up owner's video? There are also screen barrages, isn't it better than this? 2. The protagonist in the book is a video blogger. Why is there no barrage in the video? There were no comments, just a few emperors talking back and forth, which was a bit dry. If you want to write well, I suggest you study this book He has the same subject matter as you, but his writing is better than yours. You will know it by looking at the data. However, it does not have a group of emperors. If you want to differentiate, you can add more communication between the groups of emperors.

What I wrote above is okay, and there are no overly surprising points. There are many starting points for this kind of books, but your start is already ahead of many of your colleagues who have updated hundreds of thousands or more than one hundred thousand. I sincerely recommend that you read the book Spoiler of the Three Kingdoms. If the author hadn't been seriously ill and stopped reading, it wouldn't be off the list. Even so, it's conceivable that there are more copies than similar books. Don't rush to create new pictures, pay more attention to character description and changes with the times. Don't be like other books that end up being written as machine tools, and don't open too many dynasties. Only by being more valuable can people take over. A misunderstanding of this kind of book is that it can be opened too many times. Although it makes a few people happy, it is fatal to the overall structure and subsequent development of the book. If you want to cater to this kind of people, the book will not be long and it will not be written well. Finally, I once again recommend that you read the book Spoiler of the Three Kingdoms, which will inspire you, and you will understand what I mean after reading it.

All of them are boastful, but all kinds of unofficial history and self-media are also deceptive. The author should add various comparisons of ordinary people from different generations, as well as culture and other things. It is best to write about foreign countries at the same time. It's just that you can't grasp it when you write it like this. Just write about China, but also write it as a self-titled article

It's a pity that there is no talk about it from abroad. Domestically speaking, this is already the case. Microscopically, it is doomed and the way forward is cut off. We have not kept up with the changes in the world on a macro level.

Interestingly, Qin Shi Huang and Liu Bang were at loggerheads, and Ying Zheng beat Hu Hai violently every day.

The lecture was very good. I feel that if our history teacher could have taught it in such an interesting way, I might have done better in the history exam. But the problem is, I read novels mainly for entertainment. You always tell me about history, which always feels a bit monotonous. If you are interested in history, they can check it out on their own. There is no need to spend money to see it. Those who are not interested in history will not be able to read it. When talking about the First Emperor of Qin and Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty, these two periods are special and can make people excited, so that's okay. But after all, these are a minority, and the vast majority of them are not that passionate. It will make people feel like taking a history class, and the experience will begin to deteriorate, and the sense of entertainment will begin to diminish, turning into pure science. As I said just now, if you simply want to popularize history, you can find a lot of them online, including videos, so why read novels? So I personally suggest that the author think of ways to raise expectations in other aspects. For example, let several emperors interact more frequently. I think the previous work was good on this point. Qin Shihuang was struggling, Qin Shihuang was helpless, Qin Shihuang went to inquire about the future, Qin Shihuang changed his approach, and Qin Shihuang began to examine himself little by little. These are all very interesting to watch. But then something became more and more wrong. The interactions between the emperors began to decrease. After the emperor knew what was going to happen in the future, he did less and less to say. Instead, most of the space is devoted to history. I personally think that with this type of subject matter, what everyone mainly wants to see is the interaction between emperors. What they want to see is how the emperor will make changes after knowing the future. What they want to know is how the emperor will react after knowing the future. Rather than watching how you talk about history, we are not ancients and we know history. Talking about history should not be the main line. Talking about history is to let the emperors know the development of history and let the emperors make various reactions, so that we can find it interesting to watch. In other words, talking about history is not the point. The point is to let the emperors know the history and everyone wants to see what changes will happen. If you just want to see history. Everyone has had enough history classes. So I personally think that the author should focus on the reactions of the emperors, their interactions and how to change it. Originally, there is already history or it is really not possible. An industrial revolution is better than purely talking about history. Anyway, I felt that the part about Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty was quite enjoyable, but today I felt drowsy after watching these three pictures. Because you told us all these things we know, and you took us to review history. I finally left the campus, and you had to give me a history class again. It was so painful.

Why did the emperor who said he would not come in suddenly also come in? 🙂 It feels a bit bad. The author is probably not because of the negative reviews of the previous plot.