Red Alert in Hand: I Am Building an Empire in Libya

It has not developed much military power for 8 years. That red alert base is just a decoration. The author fails to understand one thing, all political negotiations must be based on your military power. Negotiating everywhere and getting so many benefits without any effort. Why would people let you do that? It feels a bit funny.

Is this a red alert? Why can't I see the existence of Red Alert after reading more than ten chapters? After the gorgeous hypocrisy, there is no more red alert. I think too much.

I don't understand. There is a red police base and they don't want to rush troops first. They start playing politics first.

From 1961 to 1980, the Red Alert Base was in control for 19 years and it was in power in Libya for 11 years. It was not seen that it did anything serious. He does nothing that a serious political power should do, and leads a team of four people every day to counter espionage.

After reading four chapters, the ineffective Gulu talks too much, and I feel very tired. Especially the fourth chapter. Why are the eyes so interesting? Each time the three people have a long paragraph describing the eyes and the environment. If it is polished by AI, it is recommended to modify or streamline it. In the early stage of the Red Alert article, you don't want to be invincible, at least highlight the military industry. It really doesn't matter what happens in the Middle East.

The entire article has 148 chapters. There is no military modernization process, no national people's livelihood, all the words focus on describing information leakage and reverse infiltration. You should write about espionage wars, and you should not write about red alert systems at all. Even if Libya has nuclear weapons, it is only feared, and it will not lose nuclear weapons. Ground wars. The United States is crushing any country at this time. The writing is meaningless.

boom

This kind of writing style is indeed rare and makes it extremely difficult to read.

Let me talk about 2 questions 1. The title of the work contains Red Alert, but the appearance rate of the Red Alert unit is very low. Among the heroes that come with the game at the beginning, only the Engineer has a sense of presence, and mine carts, conscripts, dogs, tanks, etc. Have not appeared. Especially in the latest chapter, the protagonist is assassinated, and the dog is the best unit to deal with spies, but the result has not been released; 2. Reading the entire work, it is bland and has no ups and downs, the perspective is narrow, and it feels like reading a diary or an outline.

Red Alert Explosive Soldiers was written as a Red Alert political article, and Goldfinger was blinded in vain! !

This is not a novel, it is clearly an interview memoir.

After reading two chapters, I feel really uncomfortable. It's not that the content and subject matter are bad, but that the author's writing skills are a bit problematic. The wording and sentence making are barely interesting. Anyway, it's uncomfortable to watch.

It feels like something written by a Libyan, it's too confusing to understand

I read a total of 22 chapters, and I couldn't stand it anymore, so I gave up for the time being. I would like to share some thoughts with the author. 1. The most basic punctuation issue. Instead of using "" in the quotation, use "", which seems extremely uncomfortable. I don't know if it is the author's habit or deliberate. Although Internet slang has broken down many writing standards, especially the use of punctuation marks, it is still better to behave in a serious way when writing. I didn't understand what it was at first, but it took me a few chapters to realize that it was a quotation. This completely challenges readers' reading habits. 2. The narrative rhythm is very slow and fragmented. It feels a bit like a hammer in one place and a stick in the other. The conflict is weak and the whole story is uninteresting. I only watched it because of the subject matter, but the story didn't work well. 3. The dialogue between the characters is too pretentious and looks tiring. I have recently read a lot of articles on Qidian and Tomato. Either the language is vulgar, and the whole article is written in vernacular and colloquial terms. It seems that this is down to earth. Or the language has an inexplicable "forced style", every word and every action is intended to show deep meaning, and the characters' dialogues are like being arrogant. What does it mean? There is also a political point of view. I actually do not agree with the political views and behaviors of the protagonist in the book, but it does not seem worth discussing in fictional novels. After all, it is a fantasy. There is no need to criticize it, as long as the story is well written.

It looks like writing a battle report, which does not reflect the superiority of Red Alert Technology at all. All engineers are recruited to use technology to build assembly line artificial intelligence. It will take a year to build a Star Destroyer and a space carrier, right?

The base was leaked in Chapter 5, and it was said that it was not from this era. The dialogue did not use "" but "", which looked awkward and had a deliberately literary feel. The Red Alert Base was also pitifully weak. It took many days to build a building. If there was a barracks, there was no need to detonate the troops first. It had to build a war factory.

I persisted until Chapter 24 and couldn't stand it anymore. The whole article is written in a mysterious way, with fragmented and scattered content, and seems to be condescending (the nickname of the country, the nickname of the event, etc., The reader is not a historian, and does not know the details of foreign affairs in the first place, so I don't know where the sense of superiority comes from).

I wrote a lot of nonsense. I thought it was a scam and there was strong military pressure. It's not pleasant to watch at all.

The author, like Li Dazhao, has taken the wrong path. They all advocate giving up the gun barrel to get the pen barrel, and seeking peace through war. This is obvious. You have been in the country for more than two thousand years of rituals and uprisings, and you have not made a revolution just by talking about it. The author certainly used his mouth to talk about a country in that barbaric land in Africa. I would like to be called the king of strong words I don't dare to use it if I have it, I have to suppress it 😅

Some paragraphs are inconsistent, and some plots and characters appear repeatedly. It is deliberately written to be profound but has no meaning. I try hard to make the protagonist's character taller, but it is very inexplicable, including car bombs, including Laila, including Yom Kippur, and the number of water characters. It is mysterious and a bit pretentious, especially since there is a base that does nothing but arrange engineers and infantry. It is very strange.

The whole story is about The Riddler, who wants to be a fan of internet literature but can't change his literary youth syndrome. I've never read this kind of book without reading it. Those who read internet articles will stop reading if they feel tired.

Those who self-destruct themselves as cheats will always receive the highest level of evaluation.

The writing is good and very thoughtful. It is not a cool article. It is a bit dark and difficult to understand, and the pace is too slow. It is difficult for a new author to get ahead without a fan base.

It is recommended not to write a red alert system. If you don't know how to use a powerful plug-in, it is better not to use it. It's like giving the protagonist superpowers, but still working on the assembly line every day, and scheming with the little supervisor. The audience won't like to watch it, they will just be confused. This writing style is not very suitable for systematic writing.

A good subject matter, but the AI ​​traces are too serious

You haven't put it on the shelves yet, and the update is too slow. The framework content will be based on your outline. Don't listen to the advice of those people who don't know anything. Just write the content as it is. If you want to feel good, go and watch Xiuxian. In fact, having a red alert does not mean you are invincible. Those people will treat it as Red Alert 3. In Red 2, the Iron Curtain and Chrono Teleportation are just a bit supermodel. The Soviet nuclear weapons are normal technologies. In fact, the Allied weather weapons are not as exaggerated as in the game. Don't talk about it, just be organized. I hope to see 82 Squid take the initiative to start a war. Libya, controlled by the protagonist, can launch intermediate missiles and reach the heights of Nasser before, not only in terms of reputation, but also in reality.

Is this style of writing an online novel? Or a red alert guy? Look at this dialogue, A: The tea is cold, protagonist: Well, it's cold, A: Change to a cup. A: The road has been repaired. You should go take a look. Protagonist: Well, it has been repaired. What did you write about it? For more than ten years, articles about Libya have described a few people who have been infiltrating information, and then they are still the Riddler. People who don't understand history have no idea what you are writing about.

The writing is too scattered, and most chapters are separate plots that are incoherent. Finally, I don't mention the topic. The content of the novel has nothing to do with the red alert.

So far this book has been written, only chapters 155 to 163 can be read. It will not affect you if you don't read the other chapters.

This writing is so off-putting, what does Claude have to do with you?