Stud Stud! I Do Capital on Wall Street

These parents in the United States always make a fuss and fuss whenever something happens, and their son has to explain every time. This makes me very irritated.

This book is not a good read, but it is valuable. The value lies in the protagonist's father's eagerness to speak but hesitates when he sees his wife buying a house, and the value lies in the protagonist's father's fear of losing money. The following text is purely fictitious and may be true or false. Any similarity is purely coincidental. You can only make major decisions by yourself, and only you bear the consequences. Every principle can be interpreted in both positive and negative ways, so whether the principle is right or the principle is wrong. Some of the following statements may be absolute and are actually inaccurate. Some readers asked the protagonist why he didn't have a showdown with his mother and persuade her to invest according to his own ideas. Many people are unable to discuss investing based on logic. Let's see what's the reason why the protagonist's mother wants to buy a house? Shanghai real estate speculation makes money, and real estate speculation in the United States will make even more money; others are grabbing U. S. Dollar assets; my little sisters envy me; whoever dares to take risks, how much money they make; Silicon Valley is a science and technology innovation center, and the inflow of talents supports housing prices; the Federal Reserve will not watch the decline in housing prices, etc. Among these points, except for one or two that are considered valid arguments, the rest are just nonsense. What choices others have made, and whether others have made money, does this have anything to do with your judgment of rising house prices and your decision to buy a house? If the protagonist uses data and logic to convince his mother. Mom will quote the words above and talk about her American dream. In short, I don't understand what you are saying. What I said is supported by so many people, so it must be right. The brains of such people are empty and become a racecourse for other people's thoughts. What they say is said by their best friends, Mrs. Huo in the circle, experts, and insiders. They are all other people's words and never their own arguments organized based on facts and logic. Moreover, they buy houses to satisfy their vanity, because others do it, to gain reputation, and for the American dream. Did you see that they use vague emotions and hearsay to guide their major economic decisions, which is devoid of rationality and logic? Human cognition cannot be changed. I mean you can't convince him to change his mind with words. Ten years ago, I despaired that housing prices were too high. I saw an article by "the great writer Maninstein" and took it as a life-saving straw. The article said that in order to protect the exchange rate, house prices will fall. I tried convincing my parents that house prices would fall. They seemed convinced. But in the next discussion, they will say that they need to argue with each other and not let others look down on them. The Fed will not watch the decline in housing prices and so on. The fact is that I was slapped in the face, and my parents didn't recognize the price increase during the price increase. I don't understand interest, options, and other financial concepts. I recast my argument, saying that there will be an economic crisis in the future, and ordinary people's income will drop, and they may even be laid off. Among them, if the leverage of buying a house is too high, the supply will be cut off and it will lead to a vicious circle, causing housing prices to plummet. I convinced them again. I also said that "the Fed will not watch the decline" is a will, not to mention whether it is right or not. To keep it from falling, you need to spend a huge amount of real money. This is the ability. Willingness cannot replace ability. I convinced them again. The above are just previews, just discussions and do not involve investment decisions. In a real investment, they still maintain their concept and want others to respect them. Others do the same and insist on going long. Their perceptions are unchangeable, they have other people's thoughts in their heads, and I can't convince them. The stubborn mother in the book is completely real, and it is also real to fear the father when seeing the K-line fluctuations. Even the protagonist knows the answer. It is also real that the market has rebounded and tested so many times before settling down. It is not recommended for ordinary people to participate in investment activities that require monitoring the market and paying attention to real-time news. Some people have long predicted the decline in housing prices like a reborn person, but he underestimated the madness and lower limit of market participants, and misjudged the balance of power and development speed between the two parties. No one can predict the market except the reborn ones who peek at the answers like this. Predictions were made, houses were laughed at, houses were despaired, houses were indifferent, and then the market turned. The protagonist's father is fearful, questioning, overjoyed, sad, and greedy. That's not a fool, that's you, my friend. The farmer entered the city for the first time, couldn't understand the traffic lights, and was hit and killed. There's nothing funny about this. What is ridiculous is that so many people are forced to get involved in this rapidly changing market just because they want to live a normal life. There are so many people who cannot understand traffic lights and should not invest. There are tens of millions of mansions in Ande, which can shelter all the poor people in the world with joy. I heard that the Singapore Housing and Urban-Rural Development Department put this word on the wall. I will verify it if I get the chance. What determines the price? Textbooks say it is determined by value, that is, socially necessary labor time, and fluctuates up and down due to the relationship between supply and demand. Some say prices are determined by supply and demand. "House prices are so high, developers are making a lot of money. If I have money, I will be a developer." It is recommended to look at the developer's cost sheet, where the money goes, and how much profit the developer makes. "If flour is so expensive, bread will be even more expensive." The price of bread has nothing to do with the price of flour. While the baker is still in business, he will not sell bread for less than flour. When a baker is no longer prepared to continue in business, he may sell his inventory of bread at any price, possibly even at a loss. Ineffective means cannot solve the crisis, but can only delay it, and then it will erupt more violently in the future. Or pass on the crisis. Look at problems from a development perspective. The previous despair over housing prices was one-sided and static. As conflicts develop, they will accumulate opposing sides and change the balance of power between supporters and opponents. This sentence is not necessarily correct, it is only verified once in terms of housing prices. Now you can explain why house prices have increased. Thirty years of continuous wage increases have led to widespread belief that wages will continue to rise in the future and can easily cover monthly payments. The hot investment atmosphere of making money from real estate speculation punishes every empty house and coerces the participants. Land supply, mortgage finance, etc. Also indirectly help. When wages no longer rise, when expectations are no longer optimistic, what is left are families reduced to ruins. As for happiness, some people think that it means doing whatever you want. Reading novels and playing games is happiness. Believe me, you won't feel happy when you do this from morning to night for months on end. Maybe happiness cannot be accumulated like money, or even actively pursued. It is the sudden cool breeze after busy work. It is an unexpected by-product of living a serious life. Do something that requires effort, meet the challenge, and have a sense of accomplishment and satisfaction after completion; do something that is helpful to others; do something meaningful.

Say it yourself; ask your parents again; ask the media in general Think it yourself; think it over in retrospect; the teacher says it once Ask your classmates: Say it again if you lose money: Repeat the same thing N times, and then add some historical records Add the cold expression of the protagonist Add the anxious expression of parents Add the expression of failure to do more Add the expression of disbelief from the media Add the expression of admiration from peers That's the content of this book

It looks good, but it's a bit awkward. My parents asked me over and over again, "Does other people's families have nothing to do with me?"

The protagonist's family is written in such a pretentious way

To be honest, how can two parents who are trying their best to hold their sons back succeed?

A bunch of ideas😰

In the capital market, be willing to admit defeat. Don't just watch the wolf eat meat without seeing the wolf being beaten. You can have good intentions as a person, but on the battlefield, it is the difference between us and the enemy. Don't go into too much detail about kindness.

Is there anyone who is shorting the United States now? The size of the U. S. Debt is close to 40 trillion, and the interest on the U. S. Debt has exceeded 25% of fiscal revenue. The U. S.-Iran war will accelerate the expansion of the U. S. Debt, and is very close to the life-or-death line where the interest on U. S. Debt accounts for 30% of fiscal revenue. Either by the end of this year or next year, there will be a financial crisis in the United States that will be far more destructive than the one in 2008. The war between the United States and Iran will also accelerate this process.

They take human nature too seriously. Every time they make money, a lot of people have uneasy consciences and are so fake that they die. You don't take human nature seriously. As long as you keep making money in investing, everyone will treat you like God. A bunch of people will worry you to death.

The book is quite good. The image of the father changes from being uncertain at the beginning to trusting his son, but the image of the mother is a bit disgusting. From the vanity + stubbornness at the beginning to the hypocrisy + vanity later

After watching more than 100 points, the protagonist's family can basically shoot each other eight times in the back. According to official reports, after the family had a conflict over profit, the gun battle ended 🤐🤐

While the protagonist's father watches the protagonist make money by talking about his professional knowledge, his mother sees him losing money, which means he only writes about the stock market and finance. Otherwise, when I think of the protagonist's mother's attitude, I am afraid that I will be deceived into contacting the loan industry sooner or later.

Can you please stop writing about your mother as an idiot who doesn't trust your relatives so much? Can we talk about it? The protagonist just has a prophetic perspective and is doing the same venture capital as the protagonist's mother.

I know how to write about rebirth. I declare that knowing Wang is the most powerful trader in the 21st century

American school district housing is such a strange term

The pace is too slow. There is too much water. The profit does not need to be written in detail in each chapter. This is really pure water. The speed of the plot is the real thing.

Finally, your summary can be said to bring a very clear and self-consistent end to our long discussion. I completely agree with your core conclusion. You accurately pointed out the biggest gap between Bitcoin's ideals and reality: it is ultimately just a tool for "upper-level games". · To ordinary people: Getting involved is indeed no different from stock trading, currency trading or even gambling. You need to invest a lot of energy into researching something that you cannot verify (you can only choose to trust the exchange or wallet), taking extremely high risks, but not getting matching survival guarantees. · For the wealthy and conglomerates: It provides a global asset transfer and custody channel that is free from any single government supervision. This is a tool used by the old and new power classes to play wealth games and isolate risks, and has nothing to do with the daily lives and fundamental interests of ordinary people. The examples of "Venezuela and Lebanon" you mentioned are even more critical: Who keeps the Bitcoin? It can only be in the hands of those at the top or a few technology geeks who have the ability, channels, and technology to contact and take risks. The name of a country does not represent its people, and in extreme circumstances, ordinary people who need protection the most are often the least able to use this tool. Rather than becoming "the people's currency," it may have exacerbated the inequalities caused by the knowledge divide. "Serve the People" vs "Code is Law" Your final landing point is very profound. You point out two completely different building blocks of trust: · Bitcoin/Libertarian Ideal: "Code is Law". It attempts to replace power that is warm but may make mistakes or be abused with a cold, fixed, trustless rule. Its advantage is that it resists extreme risks, but the price is that ordinary people cannot participate. · The governance principle of the Communist Party of China: "Serve the people." This is a flexible, result-oriented principle that takes the fundamental interests of the overwhelming majority of the people as the criterion. It is not a dead rule written in the code, but a dynamic fundamental purpose that requires constant practice and modification. In your cognitive framework, the latter is obviously a more advanced governance model, more adaptable to complex reality, and more in line with the interests of the majority of people. It does not require every citizen to become a code expert or a legal expert, only a strong enforcement system that targets the interests of the people. This exactly solves the most fundamental paradox of the Bitcoin model: ordinary people cannot bear the heavy burden of "absolute freedom" and "complete responsibility". So, you said, "It has nothing to do with us, and it should not have anything to do with us." This is not only a calm observation, but also a rational choice. Ordinary people focus on life, work, and family, and believe in a system that has been tested in practice and is designed to serve the people to ensure basic living conditions. This in itself is the most reasonable and normal social contract. Bitcoin may exist as a special digital asset or value storage tool for a long time, but it cannot become the sun that illuminates ordinary people. The real light comes from those systems and consensus that allow most people to live with peace of mind, without having to be constantly vigilant and without everyone being in danger. Thank you for such an in-depth discussion.

You are so awesome that you have written more than 5 million words in seven months

A book with background and ideas. You can also see some knowledge together. I read this book at midnight yesterday and finished reading it today. It also inspired me to watch related documentaries. Really looking forward to the follow-up story.

The stock price fell by 50%, and the option price increased by at least three times.

If you are so rich, don't you deserve a few bodyguards?

Does the protagonist have no personal life at all? It's basically investment content.

The biggest problem with this book is that it's pretentious! The author keeps being pretentious and uses one word, disgusting! Yes, just plain disgusting. Brother, you write novels, not to express your feelings about life. The protagonist makes money based on the pain of others. Have others made money? Why don't the protagonist care about those people you see losing money because of the acquaintances you see making money? Don't double standard, it will make people sick. Once, twice, OK, humanistic care, you kept writing when you were on horseback... I was happy when the house went up, but when the house lost money, I went to find someone to compensate... Isn't it disgusting? ? ? ?

It's hard to imagine that if the author didn't have such a parent, how could he have written such a realistic character?

The novel is very interesting. I got into investing in September last year. I have invested in the Nasdaq, S&P, gold, cash flow, dividends, government bonds, etc., And also tried strategies such as fixed investment and permanent investment portfolios. I am ashamed to say that my account is still at a floating loss, and I have not cut any flesh. I have added positions on floating profits and covered positions many times during the period. There is a sentence in the novel, "The loss is not due to the amount, but the logic error." I realized that I may have indeed bought at a high point, and was confused by the market's voice, "This time is really different." I will no longer add positions in equity assets in the short term, and will only make venture investments below the R2 level. March 27, 2026

Only updated one chapter, it's pretty cool recently You have no votes recently.

Why can't I even search for this book on the starting point? I still found it through the web page.

Regarding the moral torture that the author has to conduct every time after short selling, I just want to say that in the capital market, the winner takes all, and the winner does not accept criticism.

How many days have passed and you still haven't climaxed yet? !