All Heavens: I Am King Arthur

It's too out of the ordinary. As I read it, I suddenly started to describe something about the Mosquito Heaven Emperor. It would be better to write it normally, and something about the Xuanwu Sect fighting against each other. It's very funny.

It's a bunch of bad jokes, and the plot is confusing and messy.

After reading a few pictures, I didn't understand who the protagonist was. I couldn't tell who the protagonist was. A novel cannot clearly tell who the protagonist is within a few chapters. So this novel can be said to be a failure.

When I see the familiar Arthur text, I know whose new account you are. Your inexplicable obsession with Arthur has become the author's inner demon. The first book I remember was the Sword of Dragons and Fairy Tale World Class. The book that impressed me the most was Uncle King Arthur's Gawain, the Sun King. Steel bars are pulled out of cement to serve as holy swords. I ordered more than half of that book at that time. It was quite enjoyable to read. However, the author turned out to be an eunuch. Several books in a row were all eunuchs, and none of them survived. This one is by a familiar author, but I no longer have the desire to read it. I will read it after finishing the book.

There is no comparison. The two Arthurs are like the difference between a bug and a dragon. Excuse me.

Read the book first and then read the reviews to make sure that most people have the same opinion as me, this book is too confusing. At first I thought the author's idea was a good one, a group portrait story of two Arthurs swapping places, and I was looking forward to the two lines running in parallel. Later I discovered that the plot was all focused on the male Arthur, and I realized that this was the protagonist. After that, it was a mess, with a bunch of ancient texts, and the Xuanwu Sect and the Mosquito Heaven Emperor. Do these have anything to do with the author's story? This is not a time-travel historical novel. Overall evaluation, the story is not well written, and it is a bunch of bad jokes. I can only say that it is too self-indulgent.

Although I can understand what is being said, it is too wordy. The reading experience would be much better if it were changed.

Sorry, what is your main plot? I'm so confused.

The original world seems to be Disney Arthur, and then the moon-shaped Arthur. I can't understand the third one. It seems to be the Holy Sword User Arthur, but somehow it jumped to Siegfried and I fainted.

The two Merlins who were exchanged also had original bodies. Why did the protagonist change his body?

There is some text in the bad memes.

This beginning is so broken! The author wants to write two lines, but also intersperses them. But have you ever thought that you are interspersed too densely, writing a little something in each line, and then changing to another line to write something new! Anyone would be confused by this way of writing. You should at least make each line have a beginning and an end, and don't rush to write another line as soon as you hit the head.

Is it over again? Alas, it's still the same, the author just wants to write about King Arthur, but the protagonist of modern online novels can be King Arthur, but King Arthur cannot be the protagonist, so what exactly does the author want to write about? The title says I am King Arthur, and then it is Merlin. Does it mean that the protagonist wants to write a modern Merlin to assist King Arthur? You've already talked about the heavens, but you haven't penetrated a few worlds in the end. You might as well have worn them from the beginning. From the beginning, the author wanted to be like the knights of the Middle Ages, but you have already written about the heavens. If you continue to write like this, few people are destined to read it.

It's quite interesting that you write a kind of exchange plot that dislocates time and space.

The writing is too confusing and the worldview is not clearly explained.

The plot continuity is too poor and the chapters jump too much.

A very good book, but it also has shortcomings. Say it first. 1. The author's writing is first-rate, and he is very knowledgeable about history, mythology, literature, and settings. It will be good if you read it patiently. 2. You can imagine, different Arthur, different Merlin, different King of Swords, this is a story of Arthur's growth. 3. There is no eunuch, the writing is smooth and smooth, and the emotions are on point. It is very good. Let's talk about the shortcomings. 1. Concentrated content, which is both an advantage and a disadvantage. If you have the patience to look at it carefully, it will be very comfortable, but once your mind wanders, it will be a bit difficult. You can dilute it appropriately, of course, it depends on the author. 2. The author is easily shaken and always doubts what he is doing? You don't have money, so you can't be liked by everyone. Reading novels is just to select readers. Your subject matter is not a good one, so there are so many things that can be done in one step. 3. The turning point is too fast. When I went to Norse Mythology, the turning point was too fast. In fact, this is also what I mentioned before. The content is too concentrated. If you say a word, other authors can say half of it.

Can you write well? I've never seen you finish a book 😰

It's so confusing, I can understand it, but what's the point that attracts me? Absolutely not. The setting is actually okay, but the protagonist is not good. The protagonist is not powerful enough. It is absolutely taboo to follow the trend of online novels. Readers are brought into the protagonist when reading novels. As a result, your writing for the protagonist is terrible. My suggestion is to restart it. The protagonist should have a golden finger, and then change it. Either it will be mainstream or just unlimited. You can write it with your own writing skills. If you can't control it, you can start by looking for King Arthur from an unpopular movie (there are many such movies in the West), and then integrate some time-travelers, and then consider writing step by step, so that readers feel comfortable being brought in, and you have to give readers a goal that can attract them. You, the author, have none. This is the fundamental problem. Readers can't be brought in, and there is no goal that can retain readers. Poor performance is normal.

The ending of My Uncle King Arthur was too sloppy, I preferred the wandering dragon, but it was a pity the eunuch

The latest chapter was swallowed and I tested it. The author is more subtle 😍

Look at other people's fairy tale worlds where you are the overlord, and then look at you

Little sister Luo, now a cat, a cat wizard

I have read several books written by the author in the past. The style is in the same vein, but it is a pity that they are all tj. A lot of the content could not be well integrated in the end, and they all collapsed in the end. If it were not for historical myths, philosophical beliefs, games, anime, light novels, etc., It would be difficult to understand and read. The biggest problem of the author is that there is no clear main line, there is too much exaggeration of the social identity and cultural significance of the protagonist, too many multiple identities are projected, and the description is too complicated. In order to reflect the cultural heritage, he writes too much, but it affects the progress and plot of the story, and fails to advance the main story well. It's very similar to the previous books, so you don't have to always focus on it. What you wrote is a novel, not a cultural change. I hope the author can improve it, and I look forward to your completion.

Damn that picture without Spider-Man