Hong Kong Entertainment 84: Rise from Midnight Show Director

An absolute classic movie now! It was a bad movie that failed at the box office back then! If Tian Ruoqing has just recovered the cost! The big story is that Journey to the West failed! Eternal Dragon Sword is also a failure! Now we see average or even bad movies that were huge box office hits back then.

Previously, the protagonist went to work with Leslie Cheung without making an appointment. He wore tacky clothes and flip-flops (original words) and broke into a nightclub. He was beaten up by the security guard. Did you mean to use the protagonist's beating to show that the security guard was ignorant? Or is it difficult to film? Didn't you do this yourself? Now the protagonist takes a group of actors to dinner, but because everyone is dressed in tacky clothes, the waiter blocks the door and makes things difficult. What era is this cliché plot? What's more, it was still fabricated. Who among the young people in Hong Kong didn't care about their image at that time? What's more, actors who eat outside their appearance? And then the protagonist has made hundreds of millions. The protagonist is not rich, right, and is he still wearing tacky clothes? If you look at the photos of actors from that time, which one is not fashionable? I heard that Zheng Shaoqiu and Luo Wen even changed their own clothes just to look good. How come you wear tacky clothes every day and then randomly go out and slap the waiter and security guard in the face? Li Saifeng, Wang Zuxian, Leslie Cheung and Stephen Chow are all as idle as the author? Wear tacky clothes every day, and randomly show off to low-level people?

I don't understand why you have to be aloof. Isn't it normal to cooperate with a root cause? If you think you are great, you can do nothing to cure the root cause. It's crazy. Ask Zhang Yimou why he made a garbage movie like The Great Wall. You have no choice in front of the root cause.

I just want to ask the author, where did you get the camera? It was also very expensive to rent at that time, unlike the digital ones in 2000.

After I got good grades, I rushed to lick Jiahe and Jackie Chan. After I finished, I was looked down upon by all kinds of people. It smelled like a slap in the face, so I quit. This protagonist has been a loser from the beginning to the end.

It's right to be afraid. After seeing Jackie Chan and Police Story, I didn't want to watch it anymore. I didn't have any sense of being a time traveler. To be a hero, you have to ask for Leslie Cheung, and to cooperate with Jiahe, you have to ask for Jackie Chan. If someone doesn't want to, he still has to pull him in. You must be poisonous. There are so many subjects that I have to cover.

If you don't have money, you'll shoot low-budget movies first. Do you have to emphasize the true character of a hero? It's disturbing to watch. Someone will shoot a true character of a hero.

If you go to those original people after being reborn, won't you praise your own people? What are you afraid of when you are reincarnated?

The character plot is okay, but the author needs to understand the basic social common sense first, and stop being stupid.

The author, are you a good number or do you really like to be abused? The main plot is tortolala. Can you jump out of Hong Kong and come back with the general trend after success abroad to crush them? They will line up to lick your ass and the problem will be solved. It always revolves around a few old Hong Kong movies. These actors haven't grown up yet, so it's a bit fantasy to write like this now. There are so many Korean movies and Hollywood classics that make me anxious to watch them.

From the first chapter, I felt that the protagonist was strange, liked to point fingers at others, and was particularly capable of moral kidnapping. He was a bit player on the set, yelling "ka", pausing other people's filming, and giving various pointers. He said that he was not used to his identity after time travel, so he couldn't hold it back? Is it so difficult to keep your mouth shut? The other director told him to get out. He said that even breathing is a crime for a second-hand actor now, and he couldn't even just suggest it. What kind of identity are you suggesting? A good one, putting aside the facts

After seeing 217, I was about to give up. The previous one was just okay. At least the movies I chose were acceptable to me. Other aspects were average and I could watch it. I saw the latest chapter of 217. As far as the current setting is concerned, the company has reached the level of hundreds of millions, and it is still managed like a small workshop. I can't accept it. I invested in the mainland film industry in the 1980s and wanted to make money. I have a big head, so I can't accept it.

The protagonist takes it too much for granted, is he still a little kid? When Hong Kong movies were great in the 1980s, you had no background and wanted to make movies by yourself, so you had to eat by yourself. Just traveled through the past and died a long time ago.

It's hard to imagine that there is still such a useless protagonist who breaks into a nightclub and is punished by the security guard.

The author's writing skills are too strong. There is obviously no need for foreshadowing in the plot, but the NPC must be made anxious and confused about what the main actor is filming, and the readers are also very angry. In one sentence, the plot should be advanced quickly. I have to drag out an entire chapter to lay the groundwork. In Chapter 6, the bottom is revealed directly, and there is a ghost record, no script required. Bye-Bye. It is more promising for the author to go home and move bricks.

Author, sugar glass is easy to make and very realistic. Real glass is dangerous, the protagonist was a filmmaker in his previous life, the props are clear, and sugar glass is very simple.

In 1984, as a director on Hong Kong Island, you had to join a society and read the manifesto, and then you had to be pressured by bad guys to make bad movies. If you lost money, you would have to sink into the sea. At that time, the best solution was to engage in smuggling, or pretend to be rich and go to the mainland to borrow money to start a business, or recruit smugglers to start a society, etc. In those days, you were either ruthless or rich.

The protagonist of this book comes from a lower-class background and is very different from other grassroots protagonists. When others have their first pot of gold, they go to stocks, such as Kowloon Jia Ning Real Estate, etc., And turn themselves into capital, and they have the confidence to be on an equal footing with the big guys. This book has been relying on filming to accumulate funds, so the plot of harassment from some societies and suppression by big bosses seems aggrieved. This is very valuable. If you are worth hundreds of millions in less than thirty chapters, then what is the meaning of being from a lower class background? It is better to write about the second generation of rich entrepreneurs.

The author wrote the protagonist so well that he was pissed

This book is definitely a flop and has no innovation. When making a movie, you can't copy the script and plot. You even copy and paste the actors. Every time you encounter the actors of the original drama, you don't film it, and you behave in a low-spirited manner. You, a director, are manipulated by the actors. Do you know the red sofa in the entertainment industry?

The ghost recording must have been taken with a digital camera, otherwise there wouldn't be enough film.

Can anyone tell me what's wrong with this book? I feel like there's nothing outstanding among similar works, but I don't know what to say.

Don't you eat female celebrities? Have you been filming?

What are these chapters about? A little watery

How to solve the problem of blockbusters being released in the United States and Japan?

Liu didn't want to read the weird records in the catalogue. There wasn't even digital photography in the 1980s, it was all film.

What is this written about? Is it really about Hong Kong Island in 1984? Do you know the exclusive clauses between Shaw Brothers and Golden Harvest? It feels like the current environment is adapted to the environment of Hong Kong Island in 1984...

Is this Hong Kong entertainment a harem stud again?

It feels like 1984 was a bit late for the novel. Are there any other novels that were published earlier?