I Will Become a Notorious Urban Legend

What was written before is obviously very good, why do you want to turn it into a dark one? You can be anti-certain countries and anti-certain groups of people, but they are directly anti-human. . . We are all human beings, and there may not be one out of ten people who like to be anti-human. The audience is so small, is it really just for love?

Have you ever been a ghost story? Just write randomly and take it for granted🙂

The battle scenes are not very well written, and the protagonist's self-definition and self-perception are a bit indigenous. Modern people who have been infected by countless Internet articles will not be entangled in whether they are humans or monsters. This kind of meaningless racial distinction. Just like after time travel, it is possible to be reincarnated into a demon clan, become a ghost, become a zombie, even become a robot, become a stone, become a planet, become a black hole, it is all possible. It is pointless to dwell on whether you are a human being or not. In a word, whether you are a human being, a god, a ghost, or something else, I will take it for granted if you want to, and if you don't want to, then you won't.

How should I put it? I feel that the ghost story written by the author does not have the feeling of a ghost story at all. It is more like a monster with a special setting.

A good author should control the plot himself, rather than follow others' opinions and destroy the character himself. Some readers are like that giant baby. If they are slightly unsatisfied, they will grind through several chapters without caring about the subsequent development of your protagonist's character. Then this kind of person can call out ten people's voices alone, and he doesn't subscribe or reward. Some readers, if they don't like it, just change it to another one. If you choose one kind of readers and reject another, it is impossible for everyone to like you. Don't believe those who are reasonable. People are emotional animals. When you write a protagonist who kills people at will and is not good at communicating, you reject readers who like to read about love, peace, salvation, communication, and unity. About whether the director should be killed or not. I think you don't want to kill her. It's very simple for an author to kill a character. If you write her as a psychopath, a bitch, a crazy person, or even brainwashed and contaminated, you can kill her without any burden and earn a wave of moral reputation. After all, you are not writing a fan, and there is no original character. But you don't have any of these authors, as if the protagonist is a psycho. However, is the protagonist a psychopath? At least according to your description, the author, he still has the desires of a normal person. He also likes cats, Nako, and likes praise from others. These are all contradictory. If there are people who like the Great Love God and the Holy Mother Zheng Zha, then no one will like the coward who accepts threats. May you be a strong man and a shepherd, conquering and leading the flock.

That Director Chen rose to power at the age of 20 by killing monsters like crazy and became the second in command. He is arbitrary and does not conform to the national conditions. To kill monsters, only a few people are dispatched. There is no intelligence department to support at any time, no analysis team to analyze, and no psychological experts to evaluate. It relies on one person to kill indiscriminately, and relies on private rewards. In a huge country, there is a department that specializes in killing monsters, a department that often suffers casualties and attrition. With this kind of team configuration, is it not as good as the team that accepts bounties and dispatches more personnel? The author probably has watched too many American hero movies. The biggest thing wrong with reading this novel is here. Director Chen is so unscrupulous that there is no department to restrain him. The combatants are not arranged for psychological counseling. Moreover, he is young and has no background. He was promoted to deputy director in two years. Does this department only have team members, deputy bureaus, and directors?

It was quite cheerful at first, but then it started to get darker after reading the comments? 🙂🙂🙂🙂I thought it was nonsense, so I was disappointed.

Personally, I feel that the author originally wanted to write about the kind of weirdness that is harmless to humans but very powerful, but suddenly he started killing humans, and then completely reversed all the characters in the previous chapters. It felt very strange.

Real weapon: a familiar orange hat with a yellow patch on it Effect: The user will not die. After receiving a fatal attack, he will immediately fly into the air and play "I will definitely come back" Activation conditions: Never won a game Story: A hat found in an unknown castle. The director of the hat has disappeared, but judging from the patch on the hat, its owner must like this hat very much ——Blessing from the Loser

Because we are all ordinary people, as long as we have been tortured in society, we will have a physiological dislike for brainless leaders. "Why can such stupid people become leaders?!" This then leads to "I can't do anything to you in reality, but I have to be angry with you when reading novels!?" It is the helplessness of those who are in the corpse position and the anger of those who are not worthy of their morality. If Bureau Chen were smarter, more rational, and had the intention to communicate with the protagonist, readers would not be almost unanimous in wanting her to die. We don't necessarily hate evil people, but we definitely want idiots to die. If Director Chen is portrayed as a smiling tiger, communicating friendly on the surface, but guarding against investigation behind the scenes. It would probably be very charming to work with the protagonist but always be ready to backstab him. "Hello, Shen Mian, I am the director of the investigation bureau, can we talk?" "It doesn't matter if we were human before. Once it is a ghost story, it will always be a ghost story." "The ghost story should die. Do we expect the ghost story to understand human beings?" I would like to modify the professor's words to express my personal point of view: "I can't see fools, fools, idiots, idiots. I want them to die when I see them."