Game of Thrones: Lords of the Trident

One of the best-looking Game of Thrones novels, it can be regarded as the first among Western novels with the background of feudalism. The protagonist is a Machiavellian monarch, with a low moral bottom line, extremely wary of others, a high level of strategy, strong military command, pragmatism, and utilitarianism. Advantages of this article: 1. The plot is ups and downs. It was originally an attempt to be loyal to Robert, grant rights through the king, and rule the river from top to bottom. On the way, he was coerced by the sect's armed forces and people with good intentions, raised the flag of rebellion, and was forced to become the center of the storm. 2. Allow the protagonist to fail. The troops in the Riverlands were defeated by the West River Alliance. Dorne in the Reach did not join the protagonist at the beginning, leaving him to fight alone. Even if the protagonist is upset internally, he can still be very calm on the surface and comfort his subordinates. Disadvantages of this article: 1. The cheating is obviously abrupt. The battlefield perspective is used to help the protagonist achieve the miraculous victory in the Battle of the River. The battlefield perspective only appears in this battle and does not exist in the original work. It does not exist before or after this article. There are many miraculous battle victories in the thousands-year history of Western China, and copying them is far more appropriate than cheating. 2. The protagonist was forced to be the center of the storm and fell into a strategic disadvantage. His behavior was not reasonable. Why didn't he explain to Robert and why he didn't directly disintegrate the rebels in the East River?

Did the author delete his previous comment? I think that compared to a protagonist who is too upright and majestic, the protagonist can take a more cunning path like Littlefinger and maintain a certain bottom line. After all, being aboveboard belongs to the established nobles. If you want to pursue such a high position, it will not be the turn of the protagonist for hundreds of years, which is equivalent to being a noble without noble status.

Personally, I feel it's better than that of someone else's wife who is so awesome! Keep up the good work, author!

The starting point is so low, and the main character is so obsessed with it, and the rhythm is obviously not grasped well. I haven't even finished watching it for free and I don't know what will happen next. Is Shen Nong not there

Known world map, Westeros continent, Westeros continent sphere of influence, Essos continent Free Trade City-State, Essos continent Slaver's Bay, Essos continent Skeleton Mountains, Yidi surroundings, Sothoros continent, Summer Islands,

The protagonist's personal force value must be increased to an inhuman level. Having no force value is too frustrating, especially in the Game of Thrones.

When did Suleiman's personal troops capture the castle?

I only pre-ordered a few chapters, so I can't comment on whether the writing is good or not, but is it really good to violate guest rights and kill people? ? ? Why do some people always mistake betrayal for wisdom? The legend of the "Rat Chef" is most likely true in Westeros! What happened to the Frey family who violated their guest rights in the original novel? What happens to Euron? What happened to the Volantis slavers? What happened to the Immortals of Qarth? Including the horse king who broke the contract and James who broke the oath... In the world of ice and fire, breaking an oath will really lead to being cursed, and there is a god in the sky. Without credibility and family background, can we just rely on the so-called love of the common people to conquer Westeros? Aegon the Conqueror, who has three dragons, must respect the faith and traditions of Westeros and convert to the anointed one. During the Dance of Dragons, neither Daemon nor Rhaenyra would kill anyone during a banquet. It seems that the protagonist is smart and knows how to throw a Hongmen Banquet, right? I'm from Suqian, but I don't know what happened to Xiang Yu?

The protagonist is not an ancient person, but a modern person. In modern times, a small boss can keep several mistresses. If the protagonist has the world, he should marry more women to enjoy himself.

There are such clever politicians in Westeros. Anyone who has read the book will know that they are all noobs and idiots, which is why it is so abrupt. The level of the enemies of the protagonist you wrote has reached the level of ancient Eastern politicians per capita. Are there any wonderful performances in the original work of Black Fish? Besides running away or running away!

The title of your book is really bad, Sir Stinky Castle. Just these four words can make many readers run away. Don't think that the name is not important. If the protagonist's name is Shabi, do you think it will have no impact on reading?

To be honest, it is a ten thousand-year tradition of Westeros. A powerful earl like White Harbor Tower would be unreasonable if he wanted to be a king, and a butler who has been born for three centuries cannot win vassals. It's outrageous for a little lord to be the king

No, writing about ice and fire and also about the protagonist Wei Guangzheng? Is it fun to distribute food to people? Does the author have a bit of a misunderstanding about the quality of the feudal lords in Westeros who are ready to harm their people?

The plot arrangement is difficult to describe in a word. I have written almost 500,000 words, but there is no trace of the main plot at all. Brother, you are just a little nobleman. If the world is not in chaos, how can you get up? Do we still need to continue farming? The plot can be advanced and some farming aspects can be omitted. It seems that the author plans to write a masterpiece with millions or even tens of millions of words.

I will be here to help with the new Game of Thrones book

Don't overestimate the power of so-called hatred. Hatred can be eliminated in two generations. Brother Naide, his father was killed by the mad king. Naide's children only have an idea of the murder of their grandfather and uncle. For blood relatives they have never had contact with, they only know that there is such a person. How can there be any empathy and hatred? The hatred ended after Naide died. Some people say that the two families in the original Hejing Land had a blood feud for hundreds of years. Come on, the two families have territorial disputes. Every generation is fighting. Of course, the hatred will never end. The Starks are far away in the north and the Lannister is in the West Mirror. There is no hatred that two generations of death cannot solve. So there is no blood feud with Lannister. When Tywin dies, it is basically over, and no one cares about his brother.

It can only be said that the entire Game of Thrones combined is not as normal as any of us ordinary people. In a word, only domestic animals pay attention to bloodlines. The protagonist is an enhanced version of Huang Chao + the head of state.

The early chapters are excellent works that I can't stop reading. The plot of being forced to rebel in the later period continued to kill my desire to read. The later plot arrangements seemed to me full of absurdity. And the tone in the early stage is very separate from the tone in the later stage. Maybe it's because of the uncertainty that all existing plans will be overturned by future emergencies. But as an online novel, many readers are looking for a fantasy. To offset the mundanity of reality. This will always lose some readers emotionally. In addition, this does not mean that difficult situations that force the protagonist to raise troops and become passive will not happen in the later stage. There is a realistic logic. Regardless of reality or fiction, it's great that the protagonist can come back despite all the hardships. But author, do you really have the writing skills to handle these grand situations? Can you let the protagonist in your novel solve these problems one by one with logical strategies and create a great cause that no one has achieved in real history? Did your plot design for your later comeback against the odds rely on mechanical deity, or was it your astonishing power and strategic vision? If it were a deus ex machina, wouldn't the protagonist's astounding wisdom and foresight be a joke? If you rely on cunning and strategic vision, plus a little reasonable luck. So back to the previous question, author, do you have the writing style to control it? Moreover, the protagonist's start means that the existing team has no ability to control such an overall situation. One of the psychological reasons why the protagonist has to enter the game is to think about retreating to Essos in the worst case. There's gold and people taken from Westeros, maybe even Daenerys. With these capital and confidence in themselves, they can establish a force in Essos and counterattack Westeros in the future. But can it really happen? Who will you rely on in Essos? The protagonist's path is just to have the power of the Sultan, not the system that the Sultan's power ruled - slavery. Then we must stand on the opposite side of the majority of slave owners in Essos to unite the slaves. In that situation, there will be enemies on all sides. There is also the uncertainty of reality, which may also appear in the plan to leave Westeros. The gold he carried was embezzled by his subordinates, and the actual amount taken away would not be the expected amount. Other forces on the way to evacuate the remnant troops were watching, and they were unable to retreat safely and completely. Daenerys was not captured either, and was still in the hands of the eight-clawed spider. All these plans may be implemented one by one in the future just like the plans before the army was launched. After reading this book, it is really difficult for me as a reader to pursue reading with the same enthusiasm as in the early stage. The emotional fragmentation caused by the plot and my disbelief in the author's writing skills made it difficult for me to predict the future of this book. My current evaluation of this book is that it is tasteless and a pity to discard. It is rare to find a novel that suits my appetite in terms of background, early plot and protagonist's character over the years. The author may want to write about the vicissitudes and grandeur of past human history in the novel. Your own works cannot be mindless and cool writing by novices. This was also my passion for reading before. But now I find it difficult to watch. Personal humble opinion, not asking for approval, just writing based on my feelings. I would like to leave my thoughts on this period of reading. If I am interested and have time, I will read this book again. I want to know how the follow-up story will be, and I look forward to the author's writing skills.

The early part of this book is very good, the war strategy is well written, and it has a feeling of impact on the old system of Westeros. However, when the author faced the decline in data during farming, he chose to drink poison to quench his thirst, directly engage in waves, force religious wars, and fight for war. All the original plans were overthrown. I can only say that the data may look a lot better at the moment, but I assert that this book will end hastily.

There's something wrong with the way you write it. The protagonist's confidence is wildfire, and the secrecy of wildfire can ensure the protagonist's victory in the decisive battle. So what are the frustrating chapters in between? Just to give readers a sense of urgency? Why not write the protagonist's thoughts and let readers know that the protagonist actually has a way to break the situation and win surely? What he has to consider is how to obtain the maximum benefit. There will be no sense of dissonance in jumping from the chapter about raising an army to the chapter about hello and Elis. That is, the ten or twenty chapters in the middle are not necessary at all except to make readers feel frustrated.

No dragon? There is no dragon to write about your grandma's Game of Thrones. There are a lot of mid-world novels that you can't read and read as Game of Thrones fans. You don't even know the key points. It's a hammer to write.

It's much better than Stardew Valley. The author was exposed. The following is an all-female video.

If the old order was inherently evil, why do we still follow its rules? If trampling on the "guest rights" between nobles allows thousands of peasants to have the right to make their own decisions, is this betrayal or greater justice? In the old order, farmers will always be farmers, knights will always be knights, and nobles will always be nobles - no matter how hard you try, you can't change your origin. But the protagonist gives ordinary people a way to rise: as long as you can fight, farm, and contribute to the territory, you can become a knight and own land. These little knights who rose from the ranks of peasants, their interests are completely bound to the protagonist - if the old aristocracy is restored, they will be beaten back to their original form, or even beheaded. Therefore, they will defend the protagonist's regime to the death, which is ten thousand times more reliable than the fragile "covenant" and "credibility" between the old nobles. Tywin was the mastermind of the Red Wedding. He violated guest rights more severely than Frey, and ended up being the Prime Minister for more than ten years. James broke his oath and killed the Mad King. Not only did he not die, he also became the captain of the Kingsguard and survived to the finale The original party just felt that those who violated the rights of guests would eventually die. Then I can only say that those people did not have the support of a real core interest group network. To put it simply, he could not control the people below and there were no people who were really willing to follow him thoroughly Utilize what Jet Li said:The fist is not fast enough, nor hard enough. When a new order is established, the old order will fall apart, just like when the protagonist falls into a dream in the plot. When he is entangled by the dead ghosts, countless soldiers will appear behind him to fight for him and eliminate all these dead ghosts. How many knights does the Seven Gods have?

Rabbits can give birth, don't our ancestors know? Why have not many people raised rabbits in China for five thousand years? It's not because rabbits have very little fat and no nutrients! Far less cost-effective than raising chickens, ducks, geese, pigs, cattle and sheep. If the protagonist wants to make a fortune by breeding rabbits, that is wishful thinking and a bit unrealistic!

This Game of Thrones book can be said to be ranked among the top three Game of Thrones fanfics. I didn't think much of it at first, but the more I read it, the more I liked it. I've basically ordered it all. The author's writing style is really good.

It's not unbelievable that people who travel to another world and immediately feel empathy and sympathy for slaves and serfs. Our main consciousness is not of the same race as yours, unless you are a very moral person on Earth. You can be a hypocrite and appear to be friendly to the people, but you must hold on to your power

Although since the protagonist later became angry and decided not to play within the rules chessboard, the whole world immediately fell into chaos. I don't know if the author did it intentionally or if he just gave up on himself. Anyway, it is quite interesting and fulfills a fantasy I once had. At that time, I was wondering if there was a plot in which a person, after cultivating and becoming an immortal, would sit high in the immortal throne and control a part of the immortal world. Once someone rebelled under his rule, he would directly slap him and smash the place together with the void. In this decisive way, if it was a person, then he would destroy that person, including his place of origin, and annihilate him forever. If it is a group of people, then the group of people, including the entire space, will be annihilated! It was quite refreshing to think about it at that time, because normal people would never have such thoughts. At most, if you disobey me, I will kill you. But destroying it together with the space, if the world rebels, annihilating it together with the world is a bit extreme. But I still can't help but feel that this plot is very interesting. It's like making a fuss out of a molehill, just like using a Star Destroyer Cannon to kill mosquitoes. Behind the protagonist is killing, killing, killing, and those who don't agree will be killed. I feel that I have begun to lean towards cool writing, but my IQ is on the line. It can only be said that the author's skills are too good. The author cannot go against his own will and write things he doesn't like. For example, the author may deep down think that the characters should not be so stupid. Even if the author gives up on himself, he does not write the characters as stupid.

Westeros engages in nationalism and unites the bottom? Free people? The long winter is a dead end. Otherwise, why do you think the system in Westeros can remain unchanged for thousands of years? 🙂 Or is it that you wrote the rest of it with AI? I really didn't consider logic at all and just wrote whatever came to my mind.

I didn't grasp the rhythm well. After fighting the iron type, I was inexplicably fighting the church war, and then directly rebelled. No, don't you need to digest the things you eat? How many years has it been now?

I recommend a historical farming article, If you are interested, you can read it—— Medieval Times: I built a manor in the mountains