At the Beginning, Emperor Yongle Was Revealed, and Zhu Di Panicked!

Why are they all written about Zhu Di's execution of the ten tribes of Fang Xiaoru? It's a clear unofficial history.

It doesn't matter whether the writing is good or not, but at least those people are not smart. Why did the First Emperor get so angry when he heard that he was dead? He immediately wanted to kill Zhao Gaolisi when he heard about the death of his second son. (In Zhang Liang's assassination, he didn't catch anyone, which shows how weak the Qin Dynasty's rule was. He would have died in a few more years.) When Zhu Yuanzhang heard that Queen Ma was dead, he was like sister, and when Zhu Biao died, he cried and cried as if he was dying. Why do you think you're going to kill Zhu Di as soon as you hear that he usurped the throne? He doesn't care about the cause and effect (although he is indeed this kind of person) There are too many novels with this kind of plot now, and they are completely stereotyped. And the most outrageous statement I have ever seen is that Zhu Biao rebelled. Zhu Yuanzhang smiled and put the dragon robe on Zhu Biao, and said that if the minister did not help, he was disloyal to Zhu Biao and would be killed. Let's not talk about why he rebelled, but he really wanted to rebel. The emperor and the East Palace shared the same team, and Zhu Biao didn't even have his own confidants.

Zhu Biao received an orthodox Neo-Confucian education. It was not that he disliked the throne, but he just liked to govern the country with benevolence. And Ming Dynasty did need to change from martial arts to literature, but he was too literary and his literature was too pure. Both Jianwen and Zhu Di are flaunting martial arts, but each of them is less pure than the other. Jianwen has never been trained, and he doesn't even know what kind of people he is using. If he uses a few Neo-Confucian scholars to preside over the overall situation, defeat is basically a foregone conclusion. This is also the reason why Zhu Xi was resurrected. The most outrageous thing is that while the war continues on the front line, he still has time to discuss things with Fang Xiaoru. Zhu Biao is pure in literature, Zhu Yunwen is in literature but not in martial arts, and Zhu Di is in civil and military skills. Regardless of who is the emperor, these three people definitely want to be the emperor, and using benevolent government does not mean that they can give up that position.

I thought that in later generations it was indeed rumored that the ten clans would be killed. This issue is discussed separately in the latest chapter. This book really doesn't look like a novel. Well, I actually just want water experience.

The above is the conversation between Zaiwo and Confucius

The author writes a book promotion post or book list to promote it.

A rare occasion

Fang La also used the Yongle reign name, right?

The more novels I read about the early Ming Dynasty, the more I feel that it would be better for Zhu Biao to die and give the throne to Zhu Di so that he can live his own life. Hongwu lost his wife in the eleventh year, his son and his mother in the fifteenth year of Hongwu, and Hongwu himself also died in the twenty-fifth year. The prince's career for these twenty-five years can be said to be high-pressure and accompanied by life experiences that were contrary to his own personality. Since he was a child, he has followed his mother in the rear to take care of his younger brothers and relatives of soldiers. His mother also taught him by words and deeds, and he also studied with the great Confucian scholars. His temperament was not as cruel as Zhu Yuanzhang's, but Zhu Yuanzhang always told him that he could not be so weak, and told him to be bloody with practical actions. No matter how much I change, I will never turn into a cruel and murderous temperament. The only mother who can vent my anger is gone, and I have endured it alone for ten years. Although I have grown up a little and often quarreled with my father, I can always return to the way I was before. The subordinate officials of the East Palace are highly overlapped with his father's team. Is this also a kind of constraint? He has no military power, no ability to run his own government, and cannot handle important national affairs alone. Everything needs to be carried out by his father's hands. Also, because the prime minister system has been abolished, he still needs to share some government affairs. His health is getting worse day by day. He was so bad that when he went out to inspect the capital relocation, he fell ill and died. After his death, he killed his younger brother because of the son he had taught. His younger brother rebelled and successfully seized the throne. His own heir was demoted to a commoner and imprisoned, which was almost equivalent to annihilating his own lineage. It feels like he has spent his whole life worrying about others and has almost no time for himself. Even after his death, he will be discredited

Mainly talk about three points: First, explain the listing situation to Qidian readers. Second, talk about the author's current thoughts. Three, bibliography. First point, I believe many readers of Qidian have also discovered that this book cannot be invested in. The reason is that I first launched the Chuangshi Chinese website, which is QReading. Generally speaking, it takes 50,000 words to be put on the shelves. This book is delayed relatively late. I also ask Qidian readers to forgive me. The second point is that I, the author of this book, originally wanted to write a popular science research article. The reason was because I felt that our roommates in the dormitory were quite awesome. So I wanted to write daily life into a novel. That is this book. Lu Qingyu is me, and Luo Ji is indeed a person. There are six people in our dormitory. In addition to me, a loser, there are top students from the history department, top students from Mazhe, top students from Zhongzhe, top students from Degu, and a guy who majors in history but plans to take the science and engineering major. This book is very stressful for me. Although it is adapted from daily conversations, the subject matter is very homogeneous. So I want to write more professionally. The consequence of professionalism is the need to consult a large amount of literature. It is inevitable that there will be some negligence, so please forgive me. But it really takes a lot of time to look up information and translate documents. I can only guarantee an update of four thousand words every day. Out of respect for the author of the original text, I will put the bibliography in the author's words from time to time. Another point is that it seems that some readers do not understand what I want to express in the book. The marquee is not right. After all, the prototype is a short video. The quality of the short video is really hard to describe. The comment is not correct, for the same reason. The ancient people's comments about their predecessors that appear in it are not necessarily correct. Most of the comments are based on the fact that these ancient people have relevant works handed down, but it is very likely that these people have no access to the real history. It is even more impossible for Luo Ji to be right. After all, he is just an undergraduate, no matter how powerful he is, he cannot represent the world of history. The main reason is that the historians themselves cannot unite into one voice. Finally, the reference books (I will not list the original ancient works): Fang Beichen's "Translation and Annotation of the Three Kingdoms" Wang Jueren's "The Romance of the Three Kingdoms" Zhang Xiangrong's "Auspicious: Wang Mang and His Era" Feng Li'ao "The heroes compete for the throne, twenty years between the Qin and Han Dynasties" Song Jie "Research on the strategic positions and offensive and defensive strategies of the Three Kingdoms (later funded project of the National Social Science Fund)" Li Xiaojie "Chinese history on the map" Yu Chaoyang "The fall of Qin and the rise of Han: the system of Qin "The Dilemma of the Chinese System to the Transcendence of the Han System" br> Chen Suzhen's "From Wuyang Palace to Luoyang Palace: An Examination of the Palace Prohibition System in the Han, Wei, and Jin Dynasties" Chen Wutong and Peng Yong's "Ten Lectures on the History of the Ming Dynasty" Fan Shuzhi's "Lectures on the History of the Ming Dynasty (University Book)" Business biography "The Great Biography of Chengzu of the Ming Dynasty" Xu Weimin and Liu Youzhen's "Research on the Palaces and Gardens of Qin Capital" Wang Chongwu's "Historical Textual Research on the Ming Dynasty" Zhou Long's "The Biography of Zhu Yuanzhang" Zhu Dongrun's "The Biography of Zhang Juzheng" Zhou Yue Yue's "The Biography of Wang Yangming" "Chinese Archeology" by the Institute of Archeology, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences Feng Youlan "A Brief History of Chinese Philosophy" Li Guyue "The Narrative Evolution of Fang Xiaoru's Martyrdom and the Theory of "Executing the Ten Tribes"" Zou Fudu, Kong Dechao "Zhi" Re-examination of the causes of Qin's death from the perspective of degree changes" Jiang Dengfeng's "The Death of Qin—An Exploration of the Unbearable Responsibility of Legalism" Lu Zongli, Zhang Zhengxang's "Dictionary of Chinese Regulation in the Past Dynasties" Qian Mu's "The Biography of Confucius" Lu Xun's "Collected Works of Lu Xun" Zhang Taiyan's "Introduction to Chinese Studies" Anonymous "Records of Taizu and the Li Dynasty" "Records of King Gongjing Dingzong of the Li Dynasty" Finally, thank you all readers for your great support, thank you to the editor for your great support, thank you...

Quite interesting

I just want to ask if this canopy can be seen across the country? You can still see the location of the selected historical figure.

I feel like I haven't read it in. Is there something wrong with the writing, or is there something wrong with it?

Is there a famous scene of Han's life and death in the founding of a country but its destruction? Liu Yuan, will Genghis Khan appear on the set of Da Han?