
Nanming, My Destiny Is Too Abstract
南明,朕的天命太抽象
- Status
- Ongoing
- Length
- 374k Words
- Genre
- Historical
- Audience
- Male
- Subgenre
- Song-Yuan-Ming Dynasties
- Updated
- 1y ago
- Source
- Qidian
Stats
0Monthly votes
6.5kRecommends
22.8kFans
133Chapters
Tags
Synopsis
Reader comments
Readers also read
Red Mansion: Start Escaping and Farming from the Equipment Bar
Northern Qi, Sage Khan
Gou Served as Sima Under Dong Zhuo
After Lying in Bed for Three Years, He Was Forced to Help the Han Dynasty
Siheyuan: Start by Picking up Attributes
I Am Loyal to the Qing Dynasty
Destroy the Qing Dynasty
Immortal Who Seizes the Body
Devouring the Starry Sky: Infinite Opportunities to Hoard Treasures at the Beginning
Liu Song Is Not Doing Well
1853: Mein Kampf
New Han Dynasty 1834
Understand? Add! ! !
Understand? Add! ! !
Reading your introduction, I was reminded of a well-written eunuch book.
Regarding those negative fates later, the author thinks you have subscribed too much, right? The investment in drawing purple is not proportional to the return. Are you laughing at me who subscribed? You think you are a great god and can express your desire for expression freely regardless of readers, right? Even Cuttlefish Suhuan can't stand it, you think you are awesome 👏
The idea should be like this: In 1960, we began to seize Myanmar, opened up the sea, built strong ships and artillery divisions, and developed Western skills to seize the sea. On the one hand, we contacted Zheng Chenggong at sea to cross the sea to attack Guangzhou and seize Jiaozhi. On the other hand, we used the dangers of mountains and rivers to resist the enemy on land and wait for changes. In the next ten years, the land and sea moved forward and divided the river to rule. In another three years, the world will be established. The process of cheating depends on how big the cheating is.
I'm super, are you crazy for a prince to kill the emperor in public?
The author thought that continuous negative destiny could attract readers, but do you know how many people stopped reading the book?
Suppress it, your protagonist will be crushed to death by you sooner or later. It's okay to do it, but it's not okay to do it to people who are continuously disgusting.
Those tattered fates are useless and have a lot of negative effects. Do you think this thing is interesting? This will be a bad thing, just like 💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩, can't you delete it quickly? And why do you suppress the protagonist? After the Qing Dynasty is over, there will be a lot more to do. After the war is over, you still have to govern the world. After that, you still have to expand the territory. That's enough for you to write. Is it fun to keep suppressing the protagonist?
What's going on? That one was about the celestial eunuch, is this one going to be in the palace too?
Almost eunuch
There are no updates on the 16th, 17th, 19th, 23rd, and 24th. The author is going to run away.
Suppressing the protagonist will destroy the book, right? The audience for your book is abstract and cool writing, but as a result, after writing several destiny points that cost a lot of destiny points, they are all useless. Who will read this? It's a waste of my monthly pass.
My blood pressure is high when I see negative destiny being drawn all the time.
There is no system. Do you know how to write it?
No reply at all. It seems to be a eunuch.
It's obviously pretty good-looking, but it's just broken like this?
Why does the author always write about negative destiny? Recently, I saw that the two destiny of the Quasi-Christian Emperor and the Earthly Theocracy are purely negative. The introduction only mentions the words "decline" and "unable". We can't let the destiny judgment system judge the independent variable as negative.
Ran away
Oh, what a pity, it looks so cool
What a pity, it turned out to be a eunuch. I even set this book as food.
It's really baffling, why should Zheng Chenggong be included in the Zhu family tree? He also told everyone that he had the right to inherit, and if the protagonist died, he could take over. It was really outrageous.
I don't even know what kind of airplane the protagonist is flying. Why should we collect all that garbage? There are some negative fates that go against the will of heaven. The pressure is too harsh and inexplicable. The system is not mandatory. What is the protagonist so anxious about? It's okay to have one or two occasionally. You have to have a series of negative ones, and then there are few updates, and it seems to be a sudden death material.
If this novel can be made into a TV series after it is completed, it will definitely become a hit across the country and become a hit IP.
I just started reading this novel and have read the first dozens of chapters. I feel it is quite good. The pictures are lifelike and give people a strong visual impact. The war scenes are particularly well written. I really feel that this novel is particularly suitable for being made into a TV series. There has never been a film or television drama about time travel in the late Ming Dynasty in China. None of the domestic time travel novels about the late Ming Dynasty has been remade into a film or television drama. So the current domestic film and television drama market is seriously lacking in such film and television dramas with time-travel themes in the late Ming Dynasty. Even the historical dramas in the late Ming Dynasty are now lacking. There has been no historical drama with the theme of the late Ming Dynasty in China for many years If the quality of this novel can be maintained after the completion, the remake into a film and television drama will definitely become a big IP
Author, you need to think about some punctuation marks before using them. It is not necessary to use question marks as long as there are words like "how" and "what" in the sentence. It also depends on the sentence structure and tone. If it is a declarative sentence or declarative tone, you cannot use question marks but should use periods. For example, in this sentence, "The next thing is to see whether Hou Mangbai of Toungoo follows the course of history." You used question marks in this paragraph, but it is obviously a declarative sentence, neither It is a question (who was asked? No), nor is it a rhetorical question (what was asked? No), then it should end with a period. Another example is the sentence "I always know what you loyal ministers can do." You also used a question mark, but this sentence is also obviously a declarative sentence. It should either use a comma to show that it is related to the subsequent content, or use a period to show its declarative tone. Question marks cannot be used. To be honest, these are elementary Chinese language knowledge. It stands to reason that you, the author, should not have mastered them. Was it accidental?