You're a Forensic Examiner, So How Are You Better Than the Cops?

The first case had too many bugs The author seems to have cited a bunch of books and theories to give people a very professional look, but the problem lies in the most basic logic. First of all, there are two methods of hanging upside down and hanging. The anatomical results are actually completely different. In addition, the marks of strangulation after death and before death are also easy to detect. At first, I thought it was strangulation first and then hanging, so I did not talk about the problem of strangulation marks after death. Of course, strangulation first and then hanging can also be detected. This will not be mentioned for now. The most terrible thing is, At the end, there was a sentence that the deceased might have scratched the murderer. This was too outrageous. There was no mention of whether there was any residue on the deceased's nails. The last sentence was that the deceased might have scratched the murderer. Check whether there were any scabs on the murderer's body. Even at the end of the interrogation, it was not a DNA test because the author still did not mention the nail residue. Instead, he said that the position of the scratch was unreasonable. I guess only the deceased could have caught this position. Then the murderer confessed. To be honest, the author might as well have put the background It is set in ancient times, or simply said that the parallel world does not have modern professional instruments and forensic knowledge, but as soon as I thought about it, it is not possible. It is still the same problem, fingernail residues. Even in the ancient setting, an autopsy found that there was flesh tissue in the nails of the deceased, and there were no wounds on the body of the deceased. It cannot be concluded that it was a suicide. Even patching it up and saying that the murderer trimmed the nails of the deceased may not work. There is still something wrong with the logic from the beginning. While talking about how professional Master Wu is and how powerful the protagonist is, it is biased. Both of them ignored the key part of the partial nail. I even felt that two dissections were redundant. There was no need to dissect and dissect twice. In short, it felt like someone saw a refrigerator open and there was no air conditioning. Then he took the manual and the principle of the refrigerator and analyzed it there, and finally dismantled the refrigerator. In fact, the refrigerator was not plugged in at the beginning. After disassembly, he reinstalled it and plugged in the wires. He found that the refrigerator could cool down normally, and thought he had repaired a broken refrigerator.

I just read it and have read several criminal investigation novels. I know that people who hang themselves will have Yoshikawa lines, which are scratches on the neck caused by subconsciously tearing the rope around the neck with fingers. At the same time, there will be blood stains in the fingernails. Then the 30-year-old detective in the article doesn't understand, nor does the forensic doctor, and it seems that the protagonist doesn't understand either. It's hard to say whether the author understands it - no one mentioned this. There was no Yoshikawa line on the neck, and there were bloodstains in the fingernails, but the forensic doctor ignored them. Before he died, the deceased left scratch marks on the legs of three prisoners at the same time... The police went to find the leader in charge to judge the superiority. It was okay to commit suicide. If it was a homicide like me, which was not guaranteed, the police would almost treat it as suicide. If the first two cases are not the protagonists, they are all unjust cases, and the other police officers are all fucking trash? The first one was originally planned by the police as a suicide, but the protagonist turned out to be a homicide. Just the case of the deceased was awarded third-class merit? ? The police will also rule the second case as suicide. The protagonist came out to deal with it again, but the result was another collective second-class merit? ? ? Would you like to take a look at what you are writing? ?

I couldn't stand the first case. The task force said it was suicide, but the protagonist objected and said it was homicide. The three doubts discovered by the protagonist do not require a forensic doctor. Any veteran detective with some experience can find out that this is a forced intelligence. Later it was said that the girl had scratched the murderer before she died. What about the skin flakes during the autopsy? Not to mention it can be dealt with cleanly. If it can be dealt with cleanly, then the murderer is a professional. And the processing process will also leave traces. There was also the interrogation of three people, a group of amateurs. With this interrogation method, I don't know whether the suspects can get in, but the interrogating police will definitely get in.

Whether it was suicide by hanging, not to mention the forensic examiner, even the veteran criminal police can tell. In the end, you are a fool.

In the first case, the pretense was too much, and it was not done yet. The three doubts you raised can only be counted as two, and the last one is just speculation. The first two are too simple. Any other forensic doctor can see it. You are simply rubbing the previous forensic doctor's IQ on the ground.

Let me just talk about the first case. Wouldn't the first autopsy examine the nails of the deceased? Author, you want to highlight the protagonist and not make others smarter.

You are so innocent throughout the whole process, one case after another. The security in Jiangcheng is too bad. I have read dozens of chapters and I haven't seen the male protagonist's family background. To be honest, with the frequency of crimes, the chance of sudden death among gays is several times higher than that of their counterparts 😂

Except for the protagonist, everyone is mentally retarded. The obvious loopholes in the first case were all revealed, but the police turned a blind eye? This is the first time I have seen such a mentally retarded novel.

Cases must be investigated and doubts must be investigated, it's not just talk. From your writing, I think you should know a little bit about hospitals, but you don't know anything about the responsibilities of the public security system. It is very common to suppress newcomers, but in the public security system, first of all, forensic reports are only for reference. Secondly, in the public security system, it is impossible for graduates from the capital to be picked up by the captain in person, so there is no such suppressive behavior in the public security system.

It can be seen from the first case that the author's professionalism is not very strong, resulting in people other than the deceased either abstracting or depressing. Instead of forcibly depressing him, it is better to send him to a place where he has already been depressed or where there is no modern forensic medicine 😥