After the Demise of the Merchants and the Founding of the Country, a Family with Three Thousand Years of History

Family planning not only reduces population growth, but also affects the thinking of generations. Even this kind of novel about a thousand-year-old family turns out to be a single seedling... Starting from other genres of novels, it is barely acceptable to have an only child. In a historical novel, you write that the protagonist is an only child? I just want to ask: In ancient times, people went to bed early, had no entertainment at night and only did bed work, and there were no good contraceptive methods. Moreover, in ancient times, they were proud of having many children and being blessed... Does "only child" follow the basic logic?

Three thousand years of single fax cowhide. In ancient times, if this could be passed down for two generations, the ancestral grave would be blown up 🤭

Don't imitate his book. His book was too abstract in the end and treated all the previous extras as a joke.

Even in the Ming Dynasty, the number of people who died in infancy was high. If you go to see Song Renzong, you can't save his sons. In the period of Emperor Zhou, more people died. That's why if you have three wives and four concubines, your popularity will not be cut off. For example, if you go to see Ming Jingtai, you have to His son is here, but his brother can't fight back at all. The main reason is that his son is dead and there is no heir. The ghost is loyal to you.,,,. During the reign of Emperor Zhou, having more sons was never a bad thing. If you could keep 5 out of 10, you would be awesome.

For those of you who write about family, I have a question. Do you have to have the eldest son, eldest grandson, great-grandson, and descendants of your eldest son to be considered a family? Are your other direct bloodlines not counted as your family? Doesn't the family that is separated from the direct descendants of your second son count as a family? It's your direct bloodline.

Pay tribute to the legendary King of Sowing, who has been passed down by a single line for three thousand years, and who was castrated after giving birth to a son! The most legendary protagonist!

After reading the comments, is it the only Miaomiao family? The author wants to follow Luo's trend but also wants to write something new, right? But you can't even make up the most basic logic, and the rationality and reality of the basic settings are not guaranteed. Just reading the comments from book friends makes you have no sense of expectations for the content. If you want to build a family that has been handed down for three thousand years, you have to rely on passing it down from generation to generation? I wanted to write something new, but it was self-defeating.

Is the author's protagonist always a single person? What kind of aristocratic family is this? It's right to have more heirs. The more the better, otherwise they will kill one of you and wipe out the family and return it to the aristocratic family. Author, please look at other books like yours, Bai, Luo, Chen, they are not like you. They have so few heirs. Your writing like this doesn't count as an aristocratic family. Hurry up and change it, otherwise it's really too poisonous.

There is still a gap between the level and that book, and it does not convey the depth of history.

This sentence is pure nonsense. That is to say, I live in Xinjiang. If I risk being punished by kneeling down at home, I will also invite the family tree to be taken out, take a photo, upload it and slap the author in the face.

After reading four chapters, I feel that this book will not last long. The central idea is still similar to those about family. It follows the historical context, and then the family dominates the world in a certain period, and finally gets crazy and collapses, or it writes about the family inheritance honestly. Every generation of the family's elites go to serve as officials in the dynasty, and then take out the institutions of later generations. When the dynasty is about to be destroyed, the family runs away or invests in new dynasties. Generation after generation, taking book friends to read history.

Return loyalty after surrendering? Is the bottom line so low? We must not go on the road together to be loyal?

Not rigorous, too many loopholes. Even if you try to figure out the loopholes yourself, it's too exaggerated. The author's historical knowledge is more like he got it from Baidu. He knows one thing but not the other. And the chat on the other side was really like boiled water

Many sentences do not read well, or in other words, are faulty sentences, "which is why Ji Li was so good to the Shang Dynasty." There are several similar situations in the previous chapters. Although your writing style is similar to the sentence structure translated from classical Chinese, you can't be so crazy, especially in the beginning chapter. . .

Is the author a newbie? If you are a newbie, I won't tell you.

Again, writing about aristocratic families can be passed down for a thousand or two thousand years. They are all wise masters and wise people. Then go ahead and copy those. Anyway, these are all a routine. Or let Li Guo rule the world for four to five hundred years. Destroy the country and then dominate one side. Every now and then a savior comes along.

What about the protagonist's family name? Nobles in this era had surnames, and having a surname and a surname was the hallmark of nobility. The surname represents the origin of the clan, while the family name represents nobility.