Crusade Against the Pope

There is one thing that the author didn't make very clear, but he had that intention. First of all, what is mentioned in the book actually has little to do with materialist dialectics, and it is impossible to promote atheism. There is a high probability that it is idealist dialectical philosophy, or a turn to deism. The focus is naturally not on getting rid of religion, but on getting rid of superstition. Most readers can't tell the difference between these philosophies... Secondly, what is superstition? The author's definition should be: ignorance but firm belief. The herbalist at the beginning of the book used belladonna to harm people without realizing it was superstitious. The village chief's son doesn't know anything and slanders the method of treating diseases as witchcraft. This is superstitious. On the one hand, they are ignorant, and on the other hand, they use their ignorance to encourage others, taking advantage of other people's ignorance to draw chestnuts from the fire for their own benefit. This is something the protagonist cannot bear. That is why the protagonist wants to get rid of superstition. On the other hand, the protagonist's view of good religion should be to encourage believers' interest in seeking knowledge. The protagonist said that God created elves (microorganisms) when he created the world, and then the elves have an impact on human health. This is to reduce the dimensions of the known knowledge to the level that medieval people can easily understand, so that medieval people can remember how to prevent diseases. Naturally, it is not superstition. Abdullah, the Arab doctor behind, was a devout believer in God, but he studied medicine under the theological requirements of religious knowledge. Although it is said that understanding the world created by Allah actually promotes the progress of medicine. This is certainly not superstition. This is also the reason why the protagonist repeatedly emphasizes that he is not trying to make others kneel down (no use, lol). What he hopes is that others will explore the world created by "God" with him, rather than simply believe in the existence of God. The latter is meaningless, but the former is very meaningful and is actually the teachings of quite a few modern religions.

The great glory of our time and nation and this book that analyzes all things natural. Behold the layout of the sky, the balance of divine matter Behold the calculation of the movement of the world, and the rules of the Creator He established them at the creation of all things Not even He will violate them, this is the basis of His work The deepest secrets of the sky and the earth are revealed The force that rotates the outermost celestial sphere is no longer hidden The sun sits Commanding all things from the throne Land to Him, but the celestial bodies do not run in a straight line As they passed through the endless void The sun urged them to circle in a motionless orbit with Him as the center It is now known that the passing comets took a curved path The celestial phenomena of the broom star are no longer surprising From this book we finally know that the bright Moon God The reason for advancing at unequal steps And Why has he not bowed his head to any astronomer so far Why does the node retreat and why does the apex move forward We also know how much force the great Poseidon uses to push the tide to recede, leaving the tired ocean behind Leaving seaweed, sailors look at the tide in confusion The shore of the tide The high waves beat the shore in turn All of this troubled the ancient wise men The endless quarrels of scholars We see that the natural action of analyzing all things disperses the clouds and fog Errors and doubts no longer entangle us Because by borrowing the wings of the prophet, we can enter the room of God and peek into the wisdom of all things! , Observe the mystery of the movement of heaven and earth! And rise high into the sky O common man, rise up! Throw away the common thoughts! Understand this God-given power! It keeps us away from the life of the herd The man abstained from murder with the commandments written on stone tablets The sins of theft, fornication and perjury Teach the rich, the lowly, the powerful, the weak, the ordinary to think about all things. It was he, the gift of the Grain Goddess that saved the people from famine. He presses grapes to make people happy And shows how to unite the reeds of the Nile Write symbols for sounds before your eyes The improvement of human destiny is as little care as their miserable life But now we are allowed to enter the paradise of the gods. Being able to peep into the mysteries of life, we also have the key to unlocking the will of the sky and the earth Knowing the unchanging order of all things And the food that was incomprehensible in the past You, ah! He who drinks the wine of the gods Come and sing his name with me He has opened the treasure house of hidden truth Gerys, son of God, selfless savior Dwelling in his pure heart, he is full of divine power Closer to God than any mortal man

The problem with the title of the book, in short, is not that I want to change it, and the reason is not suitable to be mentioned here... Since I am not willing to change it, everyone should know the reason, ε=(´ο｀*))) alas Then, I would like to emphasize again that I am a staunch materialist. I submit my application for joining the party every year, and I am also the secretary of the Communist Youth League of the university. Studying religion is just an interest in the ideology of religion. It is based on critical thinking and thinking about its significance in the historical process. I do not believe in any religion, and this book does not attempt to carry out any missionary behavior. By the way, a large number of interpretations of religious doctrines in this book are purely the author's own nonsense. The teachings of the protagonist's religious order, as well as many prayers and some quotations from "scriptures" that appear in the text, a considerable part of which are made up by me myself and have nothing to do with actual religion. I don't need any excuses for this post. Thank you very much for your support.

If Hong Xiuquan is considered the younger brother of Jesus, then Jesus is not only a younger brother of Hong Xiuquan, but also a second younger brother, a third younger brother, a fourth younger brother, a fifth younger brother, and a sixth younger brother in the Taiping Heavenly Kingdom.

He who sacrifices a poor man's property is like a man who kills his son before his father. Food for the poor is the life of the poor; whoever takes away their food is a criminal who sheds human blood. He who robs others of their food earned with their blood and sweat is a murderous executioner. He who deprives a servant of his labor is a murderer of blood. (Moral Training Chapter 34:24~27)

I actually have a question. Once Garris gives birth to a child, there will be a big problem with the inheritance rights. Because he is the true Holy Son and everyone has seen him. Even if he can control his son and grandson, after he returns to the embrace of his heavenly father, his bloodline will be supported by those who are willing to do so.

My Father Jehovah (powerful! Powerful tone!) The Crusade of Heavenly King and Brother (plain but powerful!) Launching a Crusade against the Pope (what is the name of a light novel)

Reposted from Bizhan, a song commemorating Münzer (deleted) Ah Today is another grand banquet where distinguished guests gather together The laughter and screams intertwined with each other are intoxicating The Lord's gospel has another good harvest this year and the tax has doubled Listen to the clinking of glasses Recite In the scorching hot days, I worked hard on the land until I was exhausted The little income I earned was a huge gap compared to the exploitation The legacy of a lifetime of hard work was actually chopped up several times in the name of God Causing hunger and death all over the fields I traveled when I first started studying The streets It is as if purgatory has reappeared in the slums The old order is slowly disintegrating in my heart How can the filthy world be changed with penance Posting the thesis and burning indulgences in front of the door Loyalty style He threw himself into the ranks of Luther Using his tongue as a spear to pierce the truth into the ferocious faces of the papists How could he expect that his old friends would quietly change Seeking fame and fortune and seeking peace to defend oppression The former pioneers were reduced to trying to recruit Amius Words The followers of the self-established sect adhere to the crown of Hussite Rationality breaks through the net and promotes the return of the kingdom of heaven to the world Form an alliance and compile a brief summary Use the shock to smash the exploitation Wengjian Everyone is from ignorance Open your eyes The Swabian peasants raise their poles and ignite the war Crush the bones into knives and use their anger to start the fire and burn the food, and those who profit are wiped out in ashes There are beacon smoke in all directions The book "Twelve Articles" breaks the chains Vows to change the old world Luther spoke grandly in the fortress Using that cynicism to persuade me not to overdo it The priests and nobles in the palace defiled me as a murderous devil Such a violation of rules and inciting rebellion must be a traitor to the enemy Party The arrogant emperor issued an ultimatum telling me not to be arrogant Trampling on the empire to overtake one's agents, be careful to settle accounts in the future But if there are only shackles left in this world, why should we fear death Facing countless faces yearning for happiness and freedom It's okay to be a monster It's okay to be a monster The city council is formed to equalize the rich and the poor, the first glimpse of the paradise But the soldiers are weak, and the dream finally comes to nothing The old demon confessed the heinous sins I committed on the execution ground I have never regretted or confessed Let me turn into a nightmare that is difficult to shake off The head fell to the ground and I saw it in a trance Old things happen again in the future world Some people resist and some choose to follow the trend During the sinking, please don't forget my resolute face facing the executioner Even if the kingdom of heaven is torn down and rebuilt Don't hesitate Carry the torch Don't stop even if you become a "monster" in others' mouth The body will die It will disappear But my thoughts will be rooted in my heart for hundreds of years Please believe that the kingdom of heaven on earth will eventually be realized

1. It was the wrist rather than the palm of Jesus' body that was crucified on the cross 2. The theory of the Trinity did not exist at the beginning. It was established by Christianity using parliament due to sectarian struggles after Jesus left. However, Christianity does not completely agree with this view. Jesus never said that the Father, Son, and Spirit are a trinity of God, and the disciples never preached this. Nor did the first-century Christians believe in this. The first-century Christians did not have the concept of the Trinity because they did not use philosophical terms such as essence and person to discuss God. Christians in the first century did respect Jesus and worship God the Father, and they were baptized in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. Christian theology was accomplished in the hands of Paul and other disciples. It supplemented the worship of the Savior Jesus. The main idea is that Jesus is not only a prophet, but also indeed God. He died for our sins, and he used his own suffering to save mankind. Later, the doctrine of the Trinity was developed. The first person to use the philosophical term Trinity was the Latin Father Tertullian (125 AD - 230 AD). As early as the 1st century AD, questions about the nature of the Son gave rise to the opposing heresies of the Ebionites and the Gnostics. By the end of the century, both heresies were refuted by St. John, the author of the Fourth Gospel, who interpreted Plato's cosmology from a Christian perspective: Jesus Christ, he explained, was what Plato called the Logos, or incarnation of reason, which is inherent in God. The "Edict of Milan" in AD 313 restored peace and tranquility to Christianity. Afterwards, the controversy over the Trinity began again, and the flames of religious strife quickly spread from academia to clergy, to the people, and to the provinces of the Roman Empire (including Palestine and Egypt). After years of debate, the doctrine of the consubstantiality of the Father and the Son was confirmed at the Council of Nicaea with the highest authority. Later, Greek, Latin, Eastern and Protestant churches all agreed that it was the fundamental creed of Christianity. A passage from a bishop in Poitiers at that time recorded this controversy: "One thing that is equally sad and equally dangerous is that there are as many dogmas as there are opinions in the world, as many religious doctrines as there are ideological tendencies, and as many errors as there are errors. Godly reasons; because we all formulate creeds at will and interpret them at will. The question of identity was rejected at one meeting, accepted at the next meeting, and canceled at the next meeting. Here the question of the partial or full resemblance of the Father and the Son has become a subject of debate. Every year, nay, every month, I formulate new creeds to describe those unseen mysteries. We repent of what we have done, and we defend those who repent. And we curse those whom we defend. We either denounce the doctrine of others as it appears among us, or our doctrine as it appears in others; and thus, tearing each other to pieces, we become each other's source of destruction." A historian, Ammianus, recorded: "Christianity itself was very simple, but he (Constantius) confused it with foolish superstition. Instead of using his authority to reconcile the parties, he instead used verbal arguments to widen the differences provoked by his idle curiosity. Yamato spread everywhere. All day long the highways were filled with cavalcades of bishops who came from all directions to attend what they called synods; and while they endeavored to unite the whole sect to their particular views, the whole facility of the public post-houses was almost destroyed by their hasty and frequent rush." The French Encyclopedia Larousse, written in the 19th century, wrote about Monitarianism and the Trinity: "The creed of the Trinity does not exist in the Old Testament, the New Testament, the Acts of the Apostles, and the disciples of these apostles, but it is regarded as a dogmatic creed by the Catholic Church and traditional Christian sects. Both sects claim that the Trinity has always been accepted by all Christians, but the historical evidence in our hands shows how this creed emerged, developed, and finally became the doctrine of the Christian church." Larousse Encyclopedia also wrote: "At that time, belief in the humanity of Jesus was the mainstream belief of the Jews who converted to Christianity in the early church for a long time. The Christians in the city of Nazareth and all Christian sects composed of Jews believed that Jesus was only a person supported by the Holy Spirit. No one among them accused others of promoting heresy and atheism. After that, with the conversion of those idolaters to Christianity, some Christian doctrines that did not exist before appeared. The Catholic Encyclopedia, which is recognized by Christianity, also admits that early Christians did not know the doctrine of the Trinity. This principle was only added to Christian doctrine in the fourth century AD. This large encyclopedia writes: "In the late twentieth century, it is undoubtedly difficult for us to clearly and objectively explain the origin, historical evolution and periodic theological explanation of the Holy Trinity. Discussing the Trinity is like learning to discuss the shadow of uncertainty, and this is true for the Roman Catholic Church and other Christian churches. " In another chapter, this Catholic encyclopedia also writes: "Before the end of the fourth century AD, this statement, which was later named the principle of the Trinity, never appeared in Christian life and religious rituals, and we cannot find any thoughts or concepts similar to the Trinity among the disciples of Jesus. "

Now that I see it, I feel that the protagonist of this book has a mind that is very similar to that of the protagonist who conquered the kingdom of heaven in an early medieval-themed online novel. Even the setting is very similar, the same is the Son who came back from the dead. The protagonist of that book is also committed to pushing the wheel of history and letting the dawn of civilization shine ahead of schedule in the dark Middle Ages. He also relied on the religious order to build up his power, and then moved to Dongluo, and through a series of war victories, he aspired to Augustus. But then things took a turn for the worse, and they began to launch various progressive reforms, only to be betrayed in the end. Even the most loyal knights of the Order betrayed them one after another because they could not accept sharing the same pot with the peasants. The ending is that the protagonist sets himself on fire and dies. The Son of God sent to the world is once again betrayed and dies in order to redeem mankind's sins. Although readers of this book generally cannot accept such an ending and think that the young man is too illiterate, I think that such an ending just answers the question of what a time traveler should do. He could completely be his Augustus, as long as he didn't try to touch the interests of the old order, but he was unwilling to do so. The soul of modern people made it impossible for him to sit back and watch this twisted and dark world, so he did it knowingly that he couldn't do it. Are the time travelers just content to make great achievements by taking advantage of their foresight and modern knowledge, or are they actually doing something for the common people of this era? There has never been a shortage of princes and generals in history, but Bethune and Che Guevara were missing. Although I don't know what the author plans to write next, it is obvious that the author wants to create an atypical starting point for the protagonist of the online novel, who is not only decisive in killing, but also has compassion for the world.

This is not my webmaster, this is my adoptive father!

How about writing a side story where the protagonist wears FGO 😌

Why do everyone like to talk about their fan base? The only thing to read when watching the genuine version is the comments. If there are no comments, what are you reading?

God now has no name. As the only God, he is GOD. When Moses led the Jews to escape from Egypt, despite all the bragging about God's greatness in the Old Testament, God arranged natural and man-made disasters for Egypt. Not only did the Egyptians not surrender, but they also wanted to kill all the Jews, so the Jews still had to escape. God is so weak in front of Egypt. The Jews cannot deny the Egyptian gods. God also has his own name: Yahweh. In the Old Testament, the fleeing Jews received help from the local indigenous people in Garan, which is the area around Jerusalem. In order to thank the indigenous people, the Jews took over their land and established a Thanksgiving Day, uh, Purim Festival, a carnival to thank God for giving them the land to live on. The Jews were victorious in Calan, and God also received a new title: Lord of Hosts. The different ethnic pronunciations of Jehovah, Jesus, John and Ivan, the original pronunciation is Johna, the son of a carpenter. The Old Testament mainly tells the story of Moses and the Jews, while the New Testament mainly tells the story of the missionary work of Jesus and the Twelve Apostles. The Jews do not recognize the New Testament, while Christianity recognizes the Old Testament but deliberately confuses the deeds of Jesus and Yahweh. As it spread to our country, Jesus' father must also have the surname Ye. Therefore, it is obvious that Jesus and Jehovah are both transliterations of John, but they have become the names of the father and son of God and Jesus...

Some people say that the protagonist is too strong, but I think the protagonist is too weak, and the influence of personal force is too rubbish. I don't see extraordinary charisma, leadership, and political ability. Maybe it's because force is easy to write about, but charm and leadership are hard to write about. It's just a fool's errand, and it lacks courage. Where did people like Liu Bang or Liu Xiu go? They not only wanted to establish a system that transcended productivity, but also wanted to build a unified country. They also wanted to liberate people's minds. They didn't know how to do it step by step. The consequences of taking shortcuts were long detours. You have power but don't know how to use it, you have ideas but you lack courage, you have ideas but you don't know how to adapt to local conditions, you have vision but you are still limited by ignorance. Everything is a little bit off.

The protagonist's approach and the theory of knowledge given may really make future generations think that there is a god. Historian: Why is this official history more wild than unofficial history? One person beats up dozens or hundreds of people, this is not a romance novel. Biologist: Damn it, how did you find out the definition of microorganisms with your conditions? Isn't this a time traveler? . . . . . .

Trump is planning to run for the Pope. He understands that the king has learned something and understands the unity of politics and religion. I remember that the last person who combined politics and religion was King Hong Tian, ​​the second brother of Jesus and the legitimate second son of God.

It's okay to be a veteran, it's not for newcomers.

The protagonist is compared to his brother, but his power is too small! ! Superman mode can only be opened for two or three breaths!

Rt, the Pope sent a congratulatory message, the fifty-first floor, the first hundred floors!

Is the cover showing Jesus hugging Joan of Arc? Does this have any special meaning? Is it implying that the author is really a girl🤭?

The early part is very satisfying. Personally, I like to watch the main character's sermons and appearances before others. But the further the explanations become, the more dry the explanations become. I can't help but skip to the end. Finally, I turn to the end. The biggest suspense in the early part, the Great Flood (Mongolia), ends without even writing it. I have nothing to say. The early part is about food and the later part is about hay.

Recently, the old and beautiful woman called the church to ask for milk powder. It was so realistic and magical. Hahahahaha, a 70-year-old pastor in a small and shabby church in Appalachia turned out to be the last righteous person in Sodom. He said it was 😒 so magical.

Extra, my extra! People who make promises can easily break them

The protagonist is too powerful, which is a major failure in the setting. In fact, if you want to give the protagonist a miracle, just give him the ability to heal injuries quickly.

What about the extra 🙂🙂🙂

Where are the new books? Where are the new books?

The writing is quite interesting, but the post-production was too rushed.

What happened to the new book? Can I go back to the starting point and write?

Alas, there is another missing book to read every day.