I Was a Plutocrat in World War I: Starting to Save France

"I was a chaebol in World War I: Saving France at the beginning" Steel Wing Cavalry ➠ Start reading© {"TopicId":"586286831142961152","TopicName":""}{"TopicId":" 995701360950116352","TopicName":"Amway Famous Scene"}{"TopicId":"909952577470070784", "TopicName":"One Sentence Short Comment Activity"} {"LinkId":"31796","LinkName":"The 2024 monthly ticket annual competition starts!","LinkUrl":"QDReader://ataru. Qidian. Com/noah/321180584"}

The grandson of the director of a tractor factory has a hand in strategy and tactics, and the direction of future weapon research and development in one hand, and he is involved in the business world + battlefield + officialdom owo The author is very good at breaking up chapters and interweaving plots. He just wants to turn to the next chapter, but not to the extent of scratching his head and having blades crawling all over his body. Recommended to read~ In terms of military warfare and weapons and equipment, I am not a military fan, and the accompanying book is very clear with pictures and texts. Good review/w\ I heard that the book I am following has an introduction, please add a comment~

The author's writing is good, but the plot development has problems. After reading more than 200 chapters, the protagonist in the author's novel has to have ropes tied all over his body to restrict his hands and feet while fighting Germany and France. Except for winning the battle with the idiot-like German soldier, the author suppressed the protagonist throughout the whole process. A common problem among most authors is that the protagonist is passively beaten and suppressed all the time, which is considered an abuse of the protagonist. At the beginning of the chapter, I had sex with my own grandfather, and I was disgusted for a long time. Then through dozens of chapters, I poached some people from my grandfather, drained the tractor output, and ended up making some money. Grandpa also connected with big capitalists. Then the protagonist fell in love with other capitalists, and was constantly disgusted and plotted against, without any means of counterattack. It was so easy to reach a cooperation with an established capitalist, but in the end it was essentially a processing factory, and this alliance was useless. According to the way the author writes it, France is nothing but a waste, fighting within itself.

After reading this book, I feel aggrieved and the protagonist is always under pressure! I was angry, why not just write a book? Let's advertise here Name of the new book: I was a chaebol in World War I: Saving Germany at the beginning Author, I want to beat you up! The outline is being compiled! The new book will be released around mid-January, and I hope all brothers and sisters will come and support it!

You are not patriotic. If you can save France, why don't you save 40 million compatriots? You are really good 🙂

This book is very strange. It is obviously well written, and it has a cool writing style. It is all about science and technology, military, and the prophetic crushing style. It is obviously like Napoleon and mustache. Why do I feel so aggrieved? I subscribed for ten chapters. I have been winning obviously, but I feel very aggrieved when I read it. I have a very uncomfortable feeling. I don't know why.

France is too small in Europe and should go to the colonies to start anew. Both are colonial powers, and French has become a minor language. It should be that the French-speaking and English-speaking regions are just starting to develop. Looking at several large countries, they are all English-speaking areas. We just got up with the United States, let's see if it dares to sanction your company!

I feel that the author wrote a lot about the facts of corruption in French politics and business, as well as the actual incompetence of the military, but did not touch on the fundamentals of "why the Third Republic was so corrupt and incompetent." Of course, this is not the focus of this book, but it is actually recommended that the author learn a little about the Dreyfus case in France and the subsequent "Belle Epoque" atmosphere, so as to have a deeper understanding of French society at that time. After the retrial of the Dreyfus case, the entire French conservative camp was actually in a state of incompetence, the general staff was completely purged, and the military was even forcibly injected with a certain pacifist culture. From top to bottom, it was basically in a decadent and absurd consumerist cultural atmosphere. Politics basically belongs to the supremacy of the parliament, and it is almost impossible for the military to disobey the instructions of the protest. This is reflected very well in the book (乐). At this time, the liberals basically controlled French politics with the help of the Dreyfus case retrial. However, after the army originally controlled by conservatives was purged, it was in a state of complete political leadership. Joffre was actually the most capable commander under the influence of those political commanders at that time. On the contrary, the efficiency of French civil servants at that time was slightly restored under Clemenceau's tough purge. The parliament was indeed defeated, but that cabinet happened to be a group of very capable people. Therefore, France on the eve of World War I was indeed lucky to encounter the toughest cabinet in several years. Otherwise, with the social culture just after the Dreyfus case was retried, I am afraid that the defeat would be worse than World War II.

The opponent can always use similar methods to disgust the protagonist over and over again. The protagonist can only take the attack to neutralize the opponent's offensive. It is difficult to cause effective damage to the opponent. It can be said that the protagonist has been beaten. The opponent feels full of blows This will not be justified if he does not become the emperor later and confiscates all the enemies' homes, executes them and brutally kills them.

Fast forward to when; Char: My power as president is unlimited Soldiers: It's cold, Sir Charles, please put on this hat (crown)

I have a question after reading the introduction. France was the victor in World War I, right? Why do we need saving?

With the fighting power of the French, even if Napoleon is resurrected, are you better than Napoleon?

I didn't see the so-called IQ field control in the introduction. I feel that it all depends on the protagonist's skill. Once I have the technology, construction will be super accelerated, raw materials will be automatically generated, equipment will mysteriously disappear, and the opponent will be one step behind me. Didn't the author really play a game and then write a book based on the battle report? What about the payment process? Any battle of wits? Or does your wish come true and everyone else follows suit?

This book is about the protagonist constantly wandering around in the cesspit of France.

I don't know how to describe it. I see every victory of the protagonist, and then the French people cheer for him. It is difficult for me not to think that the French will not compare him with Napoleon? In the same way, the weak defeats the strong and continues to win! Was it difficult to call Charles a little Napoleon? Although they have become a republic, Shire must have become a famous general.

The author writes very steadily, to what extent? Everything that I don't understand well will be mentioned in one go. All the equipment that appears in the book appeared in the history of World War I. The author only changed the time and place of appearance. The advantage is that if you write it like this, you can't control him. The disadvantage is that there is no kind of imagination that only suits the characteristics of the moment, and I always feel that something is missing. After all, discussing this kind of imagination is more important than the novel for some readers.

Yihui is always holding back, either trying to trick the protagonist or trying to kill him. The protagonist keeps filling in the pits for them and winning wars, and they keep trapping the protagonist and plotting to kill him. What's the point of this? How much does such a great reputation mean? Instead, I was kidnapped and restrained by that reputation.

No way, md. It seems that Fa San is the same as the History of Nanming. It makes my blood pressure high. How can we do politics well with these insects?

I have read more than 100 chapters. Is the protagonist incapable of doing anything else but putting out fires? Every time you put out fires, you are not given an appreciation. So far, you haven't even gotten a general. Foch and Pétain both can't get you. Do you plan to wait for 1,000 chapters to rise to prominence? What's cool about it?

It feels like many chapters have passed and I am still arguing with the parliamentary Chongzhi. The protagonist has an idea - Chongzhi objects - Chongzhi comes to the meeting - Chongzhi sends it - the protagonist shows off his power. I've read similar passages several times. That's not to say you can't write about political struggles, but you can't make any progress at all. Brothers, they want to watch Kim Jae-gyu use his blunderbuss to control insects, and Sibi Sibi Kudengta. Who wants to watch the entomologists' intrigues under Park Chung-hee's military government for 10 episodes?

Chapter 500 is still surrounding the parliament, I think you might as well surrender to Germany😅

Three tanks designed according to the possible requirements in the book, although there is only a sketch of one, in fact I did consider the internal structure The two above use the same body, which is a light tank equipped with a 37mm L/55 gun and a three-person turret (ultimately compressed crew) (hereinafter referred to as the A-type tank, the abbreviation has nothing to do with the content of the book, the same below) and an assault gun equipped with a 75mm gun (hereinafter referred to as the B-type tank). The one below is a heavy assault tank (hereinafter referred to as C-type tank) that may be needed according to demand. The body is equipped with a 75mm gun, and the turret is also a 37mm gun, but it is changed to a two-person turret. Type A: Length of the vehicle: 4.60M Width of the vehicle (not shown in the picture, the same below): 2.30M Height of the vehicle: 1.65M (body) 2.50M (to the top of the commander's tower) Total weight: about 15 tons Crew: 4 people (commander, gunner, driver, loader) Armance: 37mm L/55 tank gun × 1 Medium-caliber machine gun (coaxial) × 1 Power: Use whatever Shire has Armor thickness: 30/20/15 (body) 40/30/20 (turret) General layout: fighting room in front, power cabin in the rear, transmission in the rear (directly copied from SU122) Suspension: balanced leaf spring suspension (refer to 38(t)) Picture below, people Crowded three-person turret A light tank that can be said to be well-designed for World War I. Because of the groundbreaking three-person turret, the combat effectiveness is extremely high. However, due to the small caliber of the main gun, it can only perform anti-armor and anti-infantry missions using only machine guns. However, because it copied many advanced design concepts, theoretically there will be no problems in using it until the 1930s. Type B: Car body length: 4.60M Car body width (not shown in the picture, the same below): 2.30M Car height: 1.80M (to the roof of the fighting room) Total weight: about 18 tons Crew: 3 people (car commander and gunner, driver, loader) Armance: 75mm L/36 field gun × 1 Medium-caliber machine gun (parallel with periscope, not shown, refer to Stalker) × 1 Power: Use whatever Shire has available Armor thickness: 45/30/15 Overall layout: turret in front, power cabin in rear, transmission in rear (directly copied from t34) Suspension: balanced leaf spring suspension (reference 38 (t)) The assault gun designed on the basis of the A-type tank focuses on strengthening the side and front armor and upgrading the firepower. Mixing it with the light tank unit can solve the problem of poor attack ability of the light tank to a certain extent. It can also be used as a self-propelled artillery when necessary (refer to the Soviets, who use the SU85 as a self-propelled artillery). The problem is that the offensive capabilities against permanent fortifications and well-designed semi-permanent trenches are indeed insufficient. Type C: Car body length: 6.20M Car body width (not shown in the picture, the same below): 2.80M Car body height: 1.90M (car body) 2.50M (to the turret top) Total weight: about 3 5 tons (this protection is actually about the level of t34/76, but t34/85 is only 32 tons) Crew: 6 people (car commander and turret gunner, gunner, driver, body heading machine gunner, loader) Armance: 37mm L/55 tank gun × 1 75mm L/36 field gun × 1 medium caliber machine gun (coaxial) × 1 Medium-caliber machine gun (direction) × 1 Power: Use whatever Charles has available Armor thickness: 45/35/15 (hull) 50/40/20 (turret) General layout: turret in the center, power cabin rear, transmission rear Suspension: Balanced leaf spring suspension (refer to 38(t)) Note: The picture shows another suspension idea, which is actually a balanced suspension. It was first designed by Dr. Porsche and used on the Tiger P heavy tank, Jagdtiger destroyer and Maus super-heavy tank. Although it looks like staggered road wheels, it is not. A heavy assault tank designed to break through trenches. It has powerful firepower. Its long length is also conducive to crossing trenches. It also has the top protection and anti-tank firepower in World War I. However, the space inside the car is also very small and relatively bulky.

Looks good share share

Putting aside the concept of this book, let's just talk about the ships currently mothballed by the United States: 10 aircraft carriers, 4 battleships, 48 ​​cruisers, 90 destroyers and frigates, a large number of oil tankers, amphibious assault ships, supply ships, and the recently mothballed littoral combat ship. Looking at the above data, you can see that the modern United States, which dominates the world with its sea and air, has not given up the idea of ​​​​battleships. This shows that battleships have their own needs, not to mention that battleships have just emerged to fight. Battleships indeed have shortcomings such as slow speed and poor maneuverability, but it does not mean that there are not enough advantages. First of all, the power of artillery. The main guns of battleships are above 300 mm, which are powerful enough to crush most coastal defenses and ships. It was not until modern missiles and rocket launchers gradually caught up. In terms of damage, its secondary guns are mostly 100mm or above artillery for both high and low-level purposes, which is also a fatal threat to medium-sized light ships and slow high-altitude bomber transport aircraft. Secondly, the thick horizontal waterline armor protects it from fire damage other than torpedoes, mines, heavy bombs and 300mm or above artillery. Battleships are indispensable in World War I and World War II. You can build them less, but you can't do without them. Just like tanks, they are not as fast as armored vehicles, their firepower is not as good as self-propelled artillery, and their armor is not as good as assault guns, but you just need them to stand in the front row to block the enemy's sight. There are many things that can destroy tanks, but you can't do without them, because you lack a fulcrum and need to spend more effort to make up for the loopholes. Just like modern obsolete battleships, it is necessary to develop more advanced missiles to replace their artillery power, and develop more advanced guided missile destroyers to cooperate with the missile power.

It's so beautiful, eunuchs are absolutely not allowed to send blades to them 😡

The so-called sequestration in the United States cannot be dismantled, right? The aircraft cemetery and the tank cemetery are all the same. Do some people really think that the mothballed things can be used immediately? The Americans have no space to maintain the active aircraft carriers on their own shipyards. Where can they repair these mothballed warships? I'm not sure whether I can find repair parts.

Enthusiastic readers are welcome to help catch bugs and correct errors. The method is as shown in the figure below: 1. Select the typo area and click the "Correction" button (limited by the starting point function, only two words can be selected at a time) 2. Enter the content to be modified and click "Submit" to directly feedback to the author's backend, and modify it after verification. Thank you for your support!

I haven't finished reading the free chapter yet, but I feel that the protagonist's IQ fluctuates and the character is unstable. Sometimes you are as wise as a demon, scheming and well-planned. Sometimes he is worse than a primary school student, innocent and stupid, and has to count money for others after being sold. Some of the free characters are swinging like this. Can we really watch them later? Can anyone tell me...

As title

The plot to complain about is in Chapter 51: The black-hearted capitalist quoted 6,000 francs per tank to the military. Then he was shocked when he learned that the male protagonist only quoted 550 francs for a three-wheeler. He immediately called the negotiator to lower the price to 5,000 francs and signed the contract immediately. He explained to the friend who asked him that he did this because if a tank was worth ten three-wheelers, the military would choose a three-wheeler instead of a tank. Tucao: There is no logic at all. We don't talk about price, only cost. Who said that the cost of a tank cannot be higher than ten three-wheeled tanks? Not to mention there are many more factors that can push it up or down, from cost to price. The understanding of the black-hearted capitalists in the book is first of all inconsistent with the actual historical development, and secondly it lacks a logical basis. What is even more ridiculous is that it has no reason at all. It is simply that the author wants to promote the development of the plot, and then arranges for this tool man to propose an idea, which feels particularly abrupt. My feeling is: to suddenly add a wisdom-destroying curse to a supporting character, and yet the book also describes it as the villain's supporting character's scheming and highlight moment, is completely inconsistent! Conclusion: A glimpse of one spot reveals the whole leopard. This book belongs to the category of short stories.