Datang: Feed Gaoyang Blueberry Bread at the Beginning

Locusts cannot be eaten when they are in swarms, as they will secrete toxins

Changle, Sizi, have their claws finally reached Gao Yang?

Don't complain about Princess Gaoyang and Bian Ji. There are already many doubts about this matter. What's more, according to the style of the Tang Dynasty, there was no taboo about killing a brother to sleep with his sister-in-law, sleeping with his father's woman, and killing his son to snatch his daughter-in-law. A princess' affair with someone would not be hidden at all, and it would have been recorded everywhere. There is a book about someone who traveled through time and became the second son of a married woman. In order to avoid being cheated on, he actually married Wu Zetian. According to the private lives of Wu Zetian and Princess Taiping, it was not about being cheated on but becoming a member of the harem. According to historical records, Princess Gaoyang was still very favored before Li Shimin's death, and later became the "eldest princess" until she was rebelled against. She is a princess who wants soldiers but no soldiers, and wants territory but no territory. What kind of rebellion is she planning?

Why not call it "Feeding Gaoyang Technology and Hard Work at the Start" 😁

As for Princess Gaoyang's affair with monk Bianji, there is currently a big controversy in the historical circles. The main basis is as follows: Conflicts in historical records "New Book of Tang" clearly records that Princess Gaoyang had an affair with monk Bianji, but the earlier "Old Book of Tang" and "Zizhi Tongjian" did not mention this matter. In addition, "New Book of Tang" was written in the Song Dynasty, and may have been mixed with unofficial history or political stance factors. For example, the anti-Buddhist stance of Ouyang Xiu and others may have affected the compilation of history books. Restrictions on the Monk Management System As a disciple of Xuanzang, Bian Ji violated the strict monk management system of the Tang Dynasty by leaving the temple for a long time to meet the princess privately, and it was difficult to escape official accountability. In addition, Xu Jingzong mentioned Bian Ji when he wrote the preface to "Yogi Di Lun". If he had an affair with the princess, Xu Jingzong, as a close confidant of Emperor Taizong of the Tang Dynasty, should have known about it but did not record it, further weakening the credibility of the incident. Political background The final death of Princess Gaoyang was directly related to Fang Yiai's rebellion. Changsun Wuji took the opportunity to eliminate dissidents from the Li Tang clan, and the accusations of adultery may have been exaggerated or fabricated as an excuse for political purges. In addition, when Fang Yizhi accused the princess of "crimes and evil," Tang Gaozong personally visited the princess's mansion, which showed that the relationship between the two parties may not have broken down. Later Interpretation and Controversy Some scholars believe that it is possible that Princess Gaoyang sought emotional sustenance due to her unfortunate marriage, but there is no direct evidence of the specific affair with Bianji, and it is more of folklore or literary creation material. For example, there is no biography or death information, and its "disappearance" may be deliberately downplayed. Conclusion: The theory that Princess Gaoyang had an affair with the Bianji is mainly derived from the isolated evidence in the "New Book of Tang". There are multiple doubts such as contradictions in historical data, institutional loopholes and political motivations, and the historical authenticity is doubtful. It is more likely that this incident was processed and amplified by later generations of literature and art, and became a symbol of the secrets of the Tang Dynasty court.

After reading the introduction, I got diabetes.

The subject matter of this book is quite good, and it is generally reasonable. There are too many inner dramas in the book, the narrative is too cumbersome, the story progresses slowly, and there are not enough exciting points. The inner dramas of the characters take up too much space. Write about what this person is thinking and what that person is like. In some chapters, the inner drama exceeds half of the number of words in the chapter, which is not a minority. Narrative aspect three, the past events in Chapter 40 are not halfway through? (I tried to skip reading 5 chapters in the middle. After dozens of chapters, the story line is not even halfway through. Can you believe it?) Want to write a crowd portrait to highlight the protagonist? However, when combined into one story line, I only see "complexity and chaos". When I further see the sea, you can be lazy but you can't be so lazy. The cumbersome narrative leads to the slow advancement of events, which in turn leads to water in various senses. As a result, the story is not advanced enough, and there are not enough exciting points to attract readers, leaving readers behind As far as the current story line is concerned, if the number of words is reduced by half, it can be considered a masterpiece. Let's take a look at the follow-up

Why don't we feed blueberry bread instead of ham sausage?

Why are historical time-travel novels almost all about soul travel, and many protagonists still have systems or personal space? It is better to write that the protagonist can travel between modern and ancient times through time and space channels. After all, it is based on Einstein's theory of relativity. It is very interesting to write about the protagonist traveling between modern times and ancient times through time and space channels. This can show the direct collision between modern times and ancient times. There are already many stories about the protagonists rebelling in the early Qing Dynasty, including the Kangxi Dynasty and the Yongzheng Dynasty. It would be interesting to write a book in which the protagonist rebelled between Kublai Khan and Yuan Dynasty in the Yuan Dynasty or Zhu Yuanzhang and Hongwu Year in the Ming Dynasty.

It's okay Although the plot is old, the writing style is very new There are many flaws, but it's okay to use it as entertainment

The relationship between Gao Yang and Bian Ji Due to conflicting historical data, there is no record of Bian Ji's death. Although there are various problems in the New Tang Book, it is currently impossible to completely refute it. It can only be said that there are doubts and its authenticity is doubtful. ① The Old Tang Book did not record this incident. The Old Tang Book was compiled in the Later Jin Dynasty . Its historical materials come from the ministers and aristocratic families of the Tang Dynasty. Its authenticity is still guaranteed to a certain extent. The Tang Dynasty was destroyed, and there was no need to save the face of the Li and Tang royal families, but there was still no record of this incident. ②The "Taiping Yulan" of the Song Taizong period did not record this incident. Subjectively speaking, Ouyang Xiu was Tang Hei. Although Ouyang Xiu believed that the Old Tang Book was complex and complicated, the sources of historical materials for compiling the New Tang Book also absorbed most of the folklore. He believed that Princess Gaoyang was ranked 17th, but the archeological evidence of Princess Ruyang's stele proved wrong. Of course, it can be said that this is a minor problem. ③Xu Jingzong, the prime minister during the period of Emperor Gaozong of the Tang Dynasty, clearly mentioned the debate mechanism in the preface to "Yogi Di Lun", which was personally decided by Emperor Taizong of the Tang Dynasty. [The Thirty Volumes of "Photographing and Choosing Fen" were written by the Grand Chief Shaman Bianji under the orders of the monk]. If Bian Ji really did this, would Xu Jingzong find himself unhappy and go to Tang Taizong? Even if it happened after compilation, the cause of Bianji's death is unknown. For the sake of His Majesty's privacy, shouldn't it be deleted directly? Anyway, there is no shortage of this information. ④In the early Tang Dynasty, the order had not yet collapsed, and the management of monks was very strict. Bianji recorded in the New Book of Tang lived outside Chang'an City. Although he was a big figure in Buddhism in the Tang Dynasty, he could not leave the temple at will. He did not have this privilege. ⑤ Paper can never cover it up. The Fang family is also a Shandong family. The royal family was not even ranked first in the original clan aspiration. Even if Fang Jun is a coward, in the final analysis, it is the Fang family's face that is lost, and the family's face that is lost. How did he hide it? This news only came out after Princess Gaoyang fell out of favor. Was it to avoid embarrassment to Emperor Taizong of the Tang Dynasty? It's not necessary, because if this thing is true, it will still be embarrassing for Tang Taizong. Anyway, what if it is false? That would be the same as what was recorded in the old Tang books, there was no such thing at all. Of course, although there are various doubts, because Song Renzong did not record it before, and after the New Tang Book and Zizhi Tongjian, there is no other information to refute it. The current archeology can only prove that there are certain problems with the authenticity of the New Tang Book, but there is no guarantee that the Old Tang Book will be okay, because archeology always comes up with new things. Therefore, the current attitude of scholars is: Princess Gaoyang's affair is doubtful

There are too many jokes and it looks like a drama.

This Wei Shuyun or this Wei Shuyun