It Is Difficult to Take Stock of History, Starting from Guo Jia at the End of Han Dynasty

Too rubbish😰

I would say that this is mainly because the author's system is too big. The three eras of the late Eastern Han Dynasty and more than 80 years cannot be summarized, and the five thousand years of China have lasted. You want to say, in the late Eastern Han Dynasty, there were only one or two people? Compared with the entire five thousand years of Yingjie? No way! Entire history: how many emperors? How many generals? How many civil servants? How many aristocratic families (families) are there? How many princes? How many! A lot of! This is incomparable. It would be easy to deal with it in the last years of the Eastern Han Dynasty. In the last years, civil servants, military generals, and princes should all be arranged and come and go as they please, but this system is too big. There are also novels that are enough to read, but novels, unofficial histories, and history? Not to mention, even the "Tai Shi Gong Shu" may have deviations, unless technology develops to a certain extent and travels back to ancient times for recording, and then the real history will be obtained at a certain time in the future. Come back, this is just a novel. No matter what you read, it doesn't fit your three views. There are also time travel by scum, primary school students, criminals, and even stars. After all, you have traveled through time, do you still care about morality? In the beginning, human beings are inherently good. Good shit! If you really want to be kind, that boy can die, but you can let the third baby be killed? Let's just say that after time travel, no one can restrain you. Online joke: Who do you want to be if you gain superhuman strength? On day one, I want to protect the world. The next day, why did I do this? On the third day, I want to protect my earth. Therefore, no one can control his desires, unless your life is in danger, and... Your will is very strong!

The Ten Philosophers of the Net Temple, right? They are also worthy of being called Yi Nan Ping in history? He was addicted to drugs, alcohol, and indulgence. He deserved to die. He deserved to die. This word is simply insulting.

History is hard to come by. Guo Jia's death is nothing...

Unofficial history is too wild. The whereabouts of Emperor Jianwen have not been resolved to this day. You directly put the story of the Ming Dynasty and Zhu Di in the Ming Dynasty. During Zhu Di's rebellion, Zhu Yunqi did have credit for Zhu Yunwen's words "Don't let me have the reputation of killing my uncle." But in this, Zhu Di's own ability was completely said to be the result of civil and military officials deliberately trying to harm Emperor Jianwen? There is also the later Zhu Gaochi. Zhu Gaochi was in poor health. Zhu Gaochi's poor health has always been described in official history. We don't know about Zhu Zhanji's short life. However, the civil servants of the Ming Dynasty only came to power after the Tumu Fort Incident. Before, civil servants were not qualified to fight with the emperor.

Another important reason for the discord between the emperor and his ministers in the Ming Dynasty was double standards. Be strict with yourself and be lenient with others. Why don't you talk about Zhu Chongba's descendants who are worse than beasts? Officials who embezzled sixty taels would be skinned and washed away, and the descendants of the old Zhu family committed murder and arson in the fiefdom. No shit. The emperor doesn't care, but local officials can't. Only the common people suffer. Many of the generals who resisted the Qing Dynasty in the late Ming Dynasty were anti-Ming, but they only joined after the Qing Dynasty became worse. The Zong clan of Li Tang and Zhao Song, who you have always belittled, dare not do this. I used to like Zhu Ming very much, but after working with my boss for several years, he arranged for his brother-in-law, who knew nothing, to be my boss. He also made me take the blame for the trouble his brother-in-law caused. I hate him very much. Just like Emperor Wanli treated Zhang Juzheng. Why did Wanli treat Zhang Juzheng like this? One of them is that Zhang Juzheng asked Wanli to be pure in desire and avoid sexual intercourse with women. As a result, he had many wives and concubines. Wanli was asked to be diligent and frugal, but ended up being extravagant and wasteful. Wanli is required to be fair and strict. But he formed a clique for personal gain. Wanli died after Zhang Juzheng died. Knowing everything will lead to such crazy revenge. The same thing happens when an official looks at Lao Zhu's clan and looks at the whole family that he can't even support with his normal salary. How can you be happy

I have read too many novels. Is it difficult for a person who is addicted to pornography, gambling, drugs, and alcohol to drink too much? How can we compare it to Zhuge Prime Minister Zhou Yu, Jiang Wei and the like?

It's so shitty, and there is a collusion between civil and military forces to trick Jianwen! Can the author tell me which country did you learn history from?

I have been a bookworm for almost 20 years and have never read any novels. Now my eyes are opened. You are an awesome author. You are so awesome. If I hadn't been Chinese, I wouldn't have been able to tell that what you were writing was Chinese history. You can't even pretend to be like this. Compared with you, The Legend of Zhen Huan is already in its 25th history. It's so real! ! ! ! !

Just by looking at the title of the book, you can tell that it is an Internet historian. The next step is to regret the death of Yang Guang during the Sui Dynasty.

That's nonsense! The writing is too poor, there are too many ambiguities, and the butt is not straight.

Poison me to death, Cao Cao slaughtered so many people. Liu Bei became the same person as Cao Cao. So poisonous

It's hard to calm down with false emotions: the innocent moans of emperors and generals It's hard to calm down with real emotions: "Your suffering is his regret"

I just gave up when I saw the word "Martial Saint" was added to Guan Yu. In the Three Kingdoms, you said that there is nothing wrong with "Martial Saint". Although it is an exaggeration to flood the seven armies, there is indeed an incident in history where Guan Yu shocked China. But he is facing China for five thousand years.

The title of the novel has been changed! Change to: Brainless history! Biography of Unofficial History This way no one will criticize you for official history, and you can write whatever you want.

Is it hard to calm down Guo Jia's anger? Can I read this book?

The author wrote about the Three Kingdoms by copying various conspiracy theories from the New Three Kingdoms. He even copied uneducated lines such as Duke of Zhou winning Lu Wang and King of Han winning Zhang Liang. It made me laugh to death.

All private goods? Are you really just making it up without telling any history? You sent it to the wrong place, send it next door.

Taking stock of Zhu Biao, I wrote a lot about Zhu Yuanzhang. Taking stock of Wang Zhen, how many of them have been written since Zhu Yunwen and have not yet reached the Yingzong Dynasty. Why don't you start taking stock from the beginning of the world?

The author brags that he has written more than two million words of historical data and memory into this thing 😥😥😒😒 This author just converts videos into texts, TV series, Zhihu, Douyin, unofficial history, and uses private information to enhance his own knowledge 😥😥😅😅

What the hell have I been writing about? What you wrote is not as good as Tomato. Is it completely a third-rate novel?

What's wrong with Guo Jia? He's a pervert, a drunkard, or a demon who helped to massacre the city. Let me tell you, Guo Jia, Xun Yu, Xun You, Xi Zhicai, Chen Qun and other Yingchuan people are all good people. Who would regard a man who massacred the city, robbed people's wives, made dry food from the people, and forcibly distributed living wives as a wise king and holy master? Between Cao Cao and these aristocratic families, the people were no different from livestock and crops. They were personal property that could be distributed and disposed of at will. At the end of the Eastern Han Dynasty, Liu Bei was the only one who still regarded people as human beings.

The Romance of the Three Kingdoms respects Liu and demotes Cao, but many of them are fictional. Zhuge Liang's quarrel with the Confucians was fake, but the real historical quarrel with the Confucians was Zhou Yu, who led the fight against Cao Cao. Zhuge Liang's straw boat borrowed fake arrows. The real protagonist of Straw Boat Borrowing Arrows is Sun Quan. This story originally took place in the Battle of Ruxukou between Cao Cao and Sun Quan, not the Battle of Chibi. During this battle, in order to observe Cao's camp, Sun Quan personally led his troops to approach Cao's camp in a light boat. When Cao Cao saw that the Soochow fleet was in full formation, he ordered his men to shoot arrows to drive back the enemy. As a result, Sun Quan's ship was shot into a "hedgehog" shape. The center of gravity of the ship changed and it almost capsized. Sun Quan immediately ordered his men to turn the bow of the ship and face Cao Ying with the side without arrows. After a while, this side was filled with arrows, and the ship regained its balance. Sun Quan then led the Soochow soldiers back to the camp. It was later written as Zhuge Liang's Straw Boat Borrowing Arrows in The Romance of the Three Kingdoms. Borrowing the East Wind is also fictional. The leader of the Battle of Chibi was Zhou Yu, and Zhou Yu participated in the strategy. The main force in the battle was also Soochow, and Liu Bei's army only played a supporting role. Sanqi Zhou Yu also discredited Zhou Yu, who was of noble character and magnanimity. Yu is a magnanimous and magnanimous person. Zhuge Liang's empty city strategy was fake. Zhao Yun used the empty city strategy in the official history and it was not Zhuge Liang. Zhao Yunchangbanpo's seven entries and seven exits are fictional, while the official history's seven entries and seven exits are literary works. In 255 AD, Wen Yang joined his father Wen Qin in raising an army against the Sima Division in Shouchun. During the battle, he entered and exited the enemy's formation many times and performed outstandingly. History books record that he "entered thousands of horsemen with his horse, often killing and wounding more than a hundred people before he came out. No one dared to force him to do so." In "The Romance of the Three Kingdoms", Zhuge Liang "burned Bowang Slope", "burned Xinye" and "burned Shangfang Valley"‌. These achievements are not recorded in historical documents, but are fictional plots created by Luo Guanzhong, the author of "The Romance of the Three Kingdoms", in order to highlight Zhuge Liang's wisdom and talents. ‌Burning Bowang Slope‌: In "The Romance of the Three Kingdoms", Burning Bowang Slope was Zhuge Liang's first battle as a fledgling, showing his resourcefulness and military ability. However, historical records show that this battle was actually commanded by Liu Bei himself. Liu Bei set up an ambush and set fire to contain Cao's army, and finally defeated Cao's army. The burning of Bowangpo was not Zhuge Liang's fault, but Liu Bei's military strategy. ‌Burning Xinye‌: In "The Romance of the Three Kingdoms", Zhuge Liang designed to burn Xinye in order to protect the people in Xinye City. However, neither "Three Kingdoms" nor "Zi Zhi Tong Jian" contains records of this incident. The burning of new fields is also a fictitious plot used to highlight Zhuge Liang's wisdom and military ability. ‌Burning Shangfang Valley‌: According to legend, Zhuge Liang designed the burning of Shangfang Valley, almost killing Sima Yi and his son. However, there is no record of this event in historical documents and it is also fictional. Warming wine and beheading Hua Xiong is fictional. Historically, Hua Xiong was killed by Sun Jian, not Guan Yu. ‌Three Heroes Fighting Lu Bu‌: There was no plot in history where Zhang Fei, Guan Yu, and Liu Bei fought against Lu Bu together. Liu Guanzhang did not participate in the discussion against Dong. ‌Guan Yu Beihai beheaded Guan Hai‌ Fake, Liu Bei did rescue Beihai in history, but Guan Hai's ending is unknown‌. Guan Yu captured the city and killed the chariot: Historically, the chariot was killed by Liu Bei, not Guan Yu. Guan Yu "passed five passes and killed six generals" is fictional. Historically, when Guan Yu left, Cao Cao directly let him go without any checkpoints. Hualong Road let Cao Cao fabricate it, and Cao Cao did not meet Guan Yu on Hualong Road. ‌Guan Yu went to the meeting alone‌ Fake, historically it was Lu Su who met Guan Yu alone, not Guan Yu who went to the meeting alone. Guan Yu scraped bones to cure poison. Historically, Guan Yu did scrape bones to cure poison, but he did not do it while eating or drinking. It was done by ordinary military doctors. The flooding of the Seventh Army was a natural disaster. Guan Yu took advantage of the natural disaster to flood the Seventh Army of Cao Wei and won the Battle of Xiangfan. However, the flooding of the Seventh Army had nothing to do with Guan Yu. It was a natural disaster and not Guan Yu's strategy. Guan Yu's killing of Wen Chou was fake. In the fifth year of Jian'an, when Yuan Shao sent Wen Chou and Liu Bei with five to six thousand cavalry to pursue Cao Cao, Cao Cao lured the enemy with supplies. Cao Cao defeated Wen Chou's army with less than 600 troops, and Wen Chou died in the chaos.

The author of this novel has too much subjective consciousness. He makes all kinds of boasts about the characters he likes, and makes all kinds of negative comments about those he doesn't like. It's too unobjective, and many of them are embarrassing and nonsense, which does not conform to the public's impression of historical figures.

It's nonsense, it's true and false, Spring and Autumn's brushwork is mixed with private goods

This book is a bit invincible. There are too many flaws in the setting logic. I really don't know how to deal with it. Can all timelines see the future? That's invincible

The first 190 or so chapters can still be read, but I have to add a modern person at the end.