Solovyov in Tsarist Russia 1796

After reading more than a dozen chapters, the translation of the text behind the French text really affected the reading experience. Occasionally, a few French sentences are enough in key places. Why is part of the chat content written entirely in French and then translated? What is the purpose? Is it to reduce the number of words or to highlight the literary and artistic flavor of the work? Another point is that in just ten chapters, a large number of characters appear. Shouldn't the names of people be gradually introduced through the unfolding of the story? It is difficult to remember foreign names. Twenty or thirty names appear in ten chapters, which leads to a lot of energy wasted in thinking and finding the relationships between the characters.

The writing is very good, and it feels like I was reading War and Peace just to show off when I was in college. I fell asleep after watching it for half an hour. The sleep effect is good, and it is true 👍.

The introduction of the book adds a few keywords, which shows that it is biased towards reality. Reading a book is originally a two-way choice between readers and authors. Readers who are reading a refreshing article should be informed in advance that this is not a refreshing article.

Looking at this old man's face, some people should think that Sir Humphrey is really colluding with Russia.

Another portrait of Empress Elizaveta Alexeyevna during the period of the Crown Princess

In the European continent during the First Industrial Revolution and the French Revolution, a time-traveler was reborn in a large European country and did such nonsense? This is like "Be honest but don't rebel." Go to a female channel. The title of the book can also be changed to something more literary. Realistically speaking, even if a time traveler is reborn, he cannot conquer the world. But can you tell me the rationality of reading novels and online articles? The protagonist's journey from Italy to Switzerland is boring. Is it outsourcing?

Many years later, when Wellington sat on the balcony of the manor and recalled his military career, he would always think of that hot, humid and bloody afternoon. When the Guards launched the charge, Wellington actually had an ominous premonition. Although the troops later filled the central gap, he did not relax. However, when he witnessed the collapse of Parker's Brigade in front of him, when he kept receiving news of the retreat of the lowland troops, he was more calm than the adjutants and secretaries around him. This just turned the hanging expectations in his heart into a real reality. Wellington was not someone he could not afford to lose. His six years in Iberia had long taught the marshal that he could not argue with the odds. However, when he received news one after another of the collapse of the British brigades on the front line, England's brightest general after the Duke of Marlborough also understood that there was nothing he could do about this battle. On this destined bloody day for the British Army, what I need to do at this moment is not to dream about how to overturn a battle that is bound to be lost, but to withdraw as much of the British army's effective forces from the battlefield as possible. "Gentlemen, use all means and tools at your disposal, notify all brigade commanders and battalion commanders you can contact, and withdraw with all your strength to Antwerp." When the marshal who once liberated the entire Iberia gave this order, he almost fell off his horse if it weren't for the support of someone around him. "William (Dernberg, commander of the 3rd Cavalry Brigade), I am just like the Czar ten years ago. I lost Europe." Although the marshal's tone was so calm that he just changed a car window, he seemed to have aged ten years in a moment, and then withdrew to Antwerp under the cover of the cavalry. On the French side, the generals around the emperor were elated. Soult initially summarized the battle situation, and then reported excitedly to the emperor: "Your Majesty, we defeated the coalition in less than four hours. The Dutch army has completely collapsed. The British and Prussian armies are retreating, and all the coalition forces are scrambling to escape from the battlefield. We have annihilated 12,000 British troops alone. Your Majesty's victory has surpassed Prince Saxe's great achievements at Fontenoy." The Emperor also. He was full of energy. It only took him three hours to prove to the whole of Europe that he was still an unparalleled military genius. While he was excited, he was also drafting a new order through Soult, "Notify Raye, Pires, Kellerman and Drouot, on the spot." Rest, clean the battlefield and place the wounded, and send people to find Grouchy and give him a reward. He came in time." "As you wish, Your Majesty." Soult was sighing while drafting the order. The former emperor was back.

The sentences are scattered, the plot is scattered, and the writing style is impossible to talk about. The worst reading experience ever. You should learn Chinese first before learning Russian.

I took a quick look and saw that the female characters described in this colorful description are all other people's wives, platonic love and true pure friendship. . . . But if you don't care about these, it still has a literary flavor.

Can you guys recommend any good novels about traveling through Western Europe? I haven't seen many that I can read in Starting Point. Yesterday I watched Rise of an Empire: Spain didn't want to read it after seeing the fourth chapter. The Austrian Empire controls the northern Venetian region. It can be written as the Austro-Hungarian Empire controls it. No one commented that it was wrong and speechless.

I felt like there was something wrong with Brother Suo Zi's battle example, but today I figured it out, isn't this Sima Yi? Against an opponent he could defeat with certainty, he showed off his speed, rushed thousands of miles to Liaodong, and stunned Gongsun. But for those who can't beat him, such as Zhuge Liang, even if his strength far exceeds that of the opponent, he must be as steady as an old dog and as motionless as a mountain.

I read Chapter 10. To be honest, I didn't understand what the author was writing or what the protagonist wanted to do.

The author himself said that the age at which young General Esso truly led an army was estimated to be that after the Napoleonic Wars, the golden age for generals and marshals was from thirty to sixty, which was roughly the period from 1820 to 1850, which happened to be the reign of Nicholas I. During this period, Tsarist Russia, as a European military police, mostly suppressed various uprisings. In other words, his resume as an army commander may be as follows: suppressing the Decembrist Uprising in 1825, suppressing the Polish Uprising in 1830, and suppressing the Hungarian Uprising in 1848. . . . On the contrary, when the really important Crimean War broke out, he was already 72 years old, the same age as Suvorov when he went to Italy. From this perspective, Xiaosuo's reputation in future history may not be very good. In a certain period, he may even be a symbol of that kind of executioner.

I would call this book a Slavic prison - the historical details and atmosphere are okay, but it just doesn't feel good! The writing style is verbose and the narrative fails to grasp the key points.

Favorite character: Paul (even if he was killed in the plot, it would be a pity to leave) Let me give you some expectations for the following plots (not making demands, respecting the author's opinion) 1. I hope that good brothers such as Eight Hot Sauce, Kutasov and Andrei will survive br>2. Recover Constantinople and achieve unparalleled achievements 3. Successfully complete the serf reform and make the Decembrists invisible 4. I hope that the protagonist will become Nicholas' Prime Minister Zhuge, from beginning to end 5. Go south to India and interrupt the British movement.

1. The name is too long. Chinese names are usually short. The author really wants to write out everyone's full name? A few people are interested in memorizing it, which obviously affects reading. 2. Does the author want to show the superiority of his foreign language? Come and translate a paragraph? Waste of time.

After watching The Sixth Antifa, I couldn't help but want to complain. The protagonist's role has been ridiculously few since 1812, and there are too many supporting roles. There are also various restorations of history. If your friends have not traveled through time, you have to restore how the characters died on the battlefield. Everyone who was close to the protagonist died, and the rest are all insects. I really feel a little uncomfortable watching it.

Self-righteousness. There is no shortage of readers for any type of novel. Is it a reader problem if people leave after just reading a few chapters?

In the latest chapter of WOC, is the protagonist actually kneeling down to take care of her? From the introduction, it seems that the protagonist is also the one who conquered the emperor. Is Jiaqing worthy? At that time, Macartney had already taken off Dai Qing's underwear. The author wouldn't write that the protagonist was downgraded to give Dai Qing warmth, hoping that Dai Qing would take the path of gentle reform, right?

........ I don't know why I spent so much time writing about a friend who ended up marrying someone else. There is basically no plot about the relationship. I feel that the protagonist is too rational and has no emotion at all. He is not a normal person at all. Those with mysophobia should stop reading. Anyway, I feel the smell of beef is very strong

It's a rubbish book, I can't read it at all.

The beginning is really too confusing. One part is imitating Russian literature, another part is a Chinese Internet meme, and another part is a copy and invention of a time-travel novel... There must be a priority.

Listen to Sulla's writings about reborn foreigners "The Prison of America", "Slightly Spicy France", etc. I can tell who is who without using my brain, but the more I listen, the more refreshing I become, oh! But Li Sailiu's writing is so classic Every time I have insomnia, just click on the first chapter to play I will fall asleep quickly, okay!

To General Carl von Clausewitz, and to the sages of European intellectual circles: General, gentlemen: After reading your comments on my theory, especially the comparison between you, General, and Mr. Hegel of my thoughts with "absolute spirit" and "pure strategic logic", I am deeply honored, but also feel like a thorn in my back. I must clarify a fundamental misunderstanding here: I am not trying to strip away the "mystery" of the East to cater to the West's thirst for "absolute truth." On the contrary, what I am trying to reveal to you is the "water of chaos" that cannot be stripped away, cannot be solidified, and cannot be fully rationalized. General, your exploration of the "absolute form" of war in "On War" is undoubtedly the most noble endeavor of reason. But let me point out that war itself is precisely the eternal rebellion against this absolute reason. On "Water of Chaos": The Boundary of Rationality and the Flash of Genius You try to use the formulas of physics to frame war, which is like trying to put flowing water into a solid cup. Water will adapt to the shape of the cup, but the nature of water is to flow. Sun Tzu's words, "Soldiers have no constant power, and water has no constant shape." This is not rhetoric, but the ultimate description of the nature of war. Human rationality has limits and boundaries. The essence of war is to repeatedly jump across the boundaries of rationality. What you call "friction" and what I call "fog" are just the surface of this sea of ​​chaos. The real core is that war is a dynamic process in which the will and wisdom of the enemy and ourselves collide and shape each other. You are changing, and so are your enemies. Any attempt to summarize the "eternal laws" will fail the moment the enemy changes. So, where does victory come from? Victory does not lie in mastering certain laws, but in seizing the fleeting "fighting opportunity" in the ever-changing chaos. This is the "light of wisdom of geniuses" that Clausewitz praised. In an era when science was not yet developed, the existence of military art is the best proof. Those great commanders—Hannibal, Caesar, Napoleon—they didn't win by formula. Through courage, intuition and a philosopher's brain, they captured the flash of light in the fog of chaos. They retained this flash as experience and wrote it in books. This is "The Art of War". It is not a "book of certainty", but an artistic guide on how to "intervene with uncertainty." It teaches future generations how to recognize the shining signs in the sea of ​​chaos. Reason is neither the slave nor its master of the will. They are companions who coexist in the same world. The laws of the material world may not necessarily work in the spiritual world. War is the eternal flow and transformation between science and non-science. You can only be sure of what you can be sure of (forces, terrain, logistics), and those elements that cannot be determined (morale, hostility, chance) can never be completely determined. But just because you're not sure doesn't mean you can't intervene. Geniuses themselves are cases of successful intervention. They used their will and wisdom to carve out a path to victory in the chaos. This is the principle of "chaotic water": although water is invisible, a skilled helmsman can use the current and wind direction to control the ship. ️ On the "double ocean theory": the strange and positive universe For this reason, I proposed the "double ocean theory". War is not a single ocean, but consists of two intertwined oceans: 1. Determinable ocean (positive): This is the domain of science. It contains all elements that can be calculated, quantified, and regularized: mathematics, geography, logistics, and weapon performance. This is the "right" of war, a strong hull, and the fundamental law of navigation. Without this ocean, any action would be blind. 2. The Undeterminable Ocean (odd): This is the realm of art. It includes all elements that cannot be calculated and are full of chance and friction: morale, the commander's will, the enemy's tricks, and the fog on the battlefield. This is the "wonder" of war, the changing wind direction and ocean currents, and the fleeting opportunity. The combination of oddity and rightness creates endless changes. In this double ocean, the commander's "genius" is strange, and the determinable laws of war he relies on are right. Both are indispensable. With only "positive", the commander will become a rigid pedant, and his ship, although solid, will get lost in the changing ocean currents. With only "qi", the commander will become a reckless gambler. His ship may be able to catch the wind direction for a while, but it will eventually sink due to a weak hull. The essence of Napoleon's failure was not that he had lost the "wonder" of his genius, but that the "righteousness" of his empire had become rotten. His hull (logistics, manpower, domestic politics) is riddled with holes. Even if he had the genius to discern fighter planes, he could not prevent the broken ship from being swamped by the huge waves of the double ocean. He longed to conquer the world, but was finally conquered by this ocean composed of "righteousness" and "oddness" that he could not truly understand. To the Thinkers: Universal Wisdom Beyond the Military Gentlemen, this theory is by no means limited to the military. * To Mr. Hegel: History is not a linear expansion of the "absolute spirit", it is also a double ocean. Economic and social laws are "righteous", while the will and the spark of thought of great men are "odd". The process of history is the result of the mutual stimulation between the two. * To Mr. Schopenhauer: The "will" you speak of is exactly the most powerful current in the uncertain ocean. But it needs a "right" hull to sail to its destination instead of destroying itself in blind impulse. * To Mr. Comte: Positivism can describe the "determinable ocean", but it can never exhaust all the mysteries of the "undeterminable ocean". The progress of human society requires the joint navigation of science and art. War is the most intense and naked form of this sea of ​​chaos. But the wisdom of navigating the "double ocean" is the common law for all creative activities. The commander steers his ship in this chaotic sea full of reefs, storms and uncertainties, seizes the flash of light and overturns the enemy's ship. This is the whole art of war and the whole wisdom of life. Sincerely, Solovyov in St. Petersburg

There are more than ten chapters, and the writing style and narrative structure are okay, but the foreign language interspersed from time to time is a failure. The biggest failure is that I don't know whether the author wrote the novel to show off his foreign language skills, to make money, or for fun. People who read so many foreign languages ​​​​on a novel platform feel uncomfortable. After reading dozens of chapters, there is still such a naughty operation, so I have withdrawn it.

Military strategist, strategist, reformer, founder of modern Russian bureaucracy and educational system, Orientalist, inventor, there is no escaping them. By the way, the protagonist can be called the "crusher of three empires". Napoleon's French Empire, Ottoman Empire, and Persian Empire were all defeated in his hands.

Engage in a revolutionary rebellion. Most of Chinese history is about rebels and becoming emperors. How come foreign histories are all about succession or plutocrats? No matter how rich you are, you can have an emperor and become rich, the whole world will be yours.

Hardcover reply. I want to imitate Russian literature but the writing is a mess. The writing is too verbose and messy to find the point, just like a haphazardly spread sesame pancake. The characters are just superficial and lack depth, and the plot is too grindy and messy to appreciate.

When did you start doing perfect attendance?

Is he the author who wrote about the north and south of the Tianshan Mountains and the Red Star in X soil?😄