Japanese Literary Giants Usher in a New Era of Japanese Literature

The decline of Japanese naturalistic literature happened during the Great Rebellion. The heyday of natural literature was also the period when anti-natural literature emerged. Not to mention the popularity of Tolstoy, since we all have a literary spring, we directly copied the New Thoughts school, even their ancestor Soseki. As a result, the author skipped these people and copied the New Sensation school, and finally copied the crappy "Snow Country". Is this novel really new? Kawabata's representative work of the New Sensation School is "Asakusa Red Ball", which also involves the Great Kanto Earthquake that influenced the founding of the New Sensation School. The follow-up "The Setting Sun" and "The Chrysanthemum and the Sword" are even more difficult and bad. Dazai Osamu's works belong only to Dazai Osamu. Every character is a clone of Dazai Osamu, and the ideas represented can be found in Dazai Osamu's life's works. As for "Snow Country" and "Setting Sun", if there is any coherence between these two works, it may be because the author is not good at writing long stories (lack of grasp of structure), and Okuno Takeo can't stand it. It can even be said that "Snow Country" is so popular and has become a classic masterpiece by chance. I really like Atsushi Otanino's arbitrary but interesting words. Kawabata was already thirty-five years old at the time, and it was time for the literary world to pursue him. Let's talk about "The Chrysanthemum and the Sword". This book has only academic historical significance at best. However, in the final analysis, it is written for American foreign guests. It has a priori methodology and racist conclusions. How can a "Japanese" copy this kind of thing? In 1920, even if the name of Xiaoxiong Eiji's newspaper was changed, wouldn't it be better than this bad book?

The whole text has no main plot or character structure, and it doesn't look like a novel. Moreover, it's too outrageous for you to write about a Japanese person writing about Chrysanthemum and Knife. The person who wrote Chrysanthemum and Knife has never been to Japan. There are so many loopholes in the book. I don't even know how Chrysanthemum and Knife became popular. I suggest the author to establish a good outline of the novel. This is not like a novel at all. You just want to express your own opinions in a literary parity.

My literary level is not very high, I am just talking about my personal feelings here. The first one is that the protagonist just copied it now, which seems to have nothing to do with the work itself. For a work like "Snow Country", the main idea is just scratched the surface; "Setting Sun" has no sense of existence at all. It is hard to imagine what difference it will make if it is replaced by "Analytical Mathematics". Anyway, everyone is shocked and discusses it, and does not write anything else. (I think you can bring the story of a certain novel into it and go through it. It will not only be happy but also have some plot, and the protagonist's image will be more three-dimensional.) Secondly, the author seems to intend to kill the literary giants of the original world. After all, judging from the cat, the author has written about Natsume Soseki. There is also Ryunosuke Akutagawa. The original world of "Bungai Spring" was founded by his friend Hiroshi Kikuchi. The protagonist is a contracted writer. I don't believe it if you say that the two of them have never met. The third thing is this history. Since it is not written, then the author does not post the setting in the book circle. Where can I see it? Finally, it will be difficult for the yandere sister to end the story without getting married.

Don't always write side stories and epilogues

As a Japanese, just don't be disgusted by this.

Why didn't we talk about it in the future? Isn't that interesting? It feels like reading a biography. Mark the relevant parts and put them at the end. If you don't want to read them, you can skip them. Everyone will be happy.

Well written It just feels like the author is a history major, not a literature major It has a lot of capacity but not very readable

I just think, Tokyo is hot.

After reading ten chapters, six of them ended with interviews, interviews, and reports. Does the author like this way of writing?

Someone actually writes about traveling to Japan to become a Japanese prisoner

I really want to write about someone who opens a dance hall, maid shop, and bubble bath in Japan. Which website can write about this kind of article?

You write exactly where you think, and the rhythm is weird. You write like you are reading a two-dimensional novel. And the emotional scenes are a bit awkward, as they are always the younger sister's and older brother's. Not much content. The information density is not high enough. There must be a main line, branches and so on. This is like the book I read when I was a kid, the plot is a bit simple. For example, some environments can be described, and the protagonist needs to be foreshadowed when writing a book. It has always been said that the male protagonist has a literary temperament, but how long is the protagonist's hair, how tall is he, and how does he behave. After I finished reading, I only saw a few literary terms that were quite interesting, but I didn't have any other ideas.

What do you all want to see me write?

This author wants to write about Japanese literature, but he knows too little about Japanese literature. I just read a few popular Japanese books in China, and maybe some related comments on natural literature, so I started writing the book. I didn't have much in mind, and I didn't like to look up information or didn't know how to look up information. I didn't have much ability to look up information. As I continue to write, I feel so overwhelmed that I can no longer write. The most speechless thing is that you are a literary giant, but you ended up copying the academic article "The Chrysanthemum and the Knife"? You only know that this book is famous, but you have never read it, right? Even Baidu doesn't bother to look at it, right? "The Chrysanthemum and the Knife" is an academic monograph written by the Americans after the victory of World War II in order to facilitate the management of Japan and study the Japanese national character, so as to "prescribe the right medicine". Moreover, many things written are not appropriate. To make it easier for Americans to understand, the full text deconstructs Japan from an American perspective. One of them is a very inappropriate comparison between my country and Japan. The author of "The Chrysanthemum and the Sword" does not understand China, and uses ordinary Americans' stereotypes of China and East Asia to make analogies to help Americans understand Japan. You dressed as a Japanese and ended up helping Japanese people understand Japan from an American perspective? Don't be ridiculous, that's not what Japanese traitors and Japanese public intellectuals do, right? To summarize, I have too little stuff in my stomach, not enough accumulation, the writing is a little better, and the plot structure is just a mess. As the future goes on, I will find more and more loopholes that are increasingly impossible to fix, so I cut it. If you don't know anything about Japan, you can still watch the fun, but if you don't know anything about Japan, not many people will click in to watch it, right? If the author writes a book again in the future, he should accumulate it before writing. The author's writing skills are still good.

If you cut it, it would be a good thing to finish it as soon as possible and let everyone share some coins.