The Prodigal Son of the Era

I have three poisonous points: 1. Going to the countryside has turned into a love brain 2. The timeline is unclear, and the writing is very similar to the time when the policy of sending to the countryside was first introduced, and it is not very understandable for an only child to go to the countryside. 3. Farm work in rural areas can use manpower but not money. You buy white vinegar to make pesticides, spend your money, and give you work points, so you are taking advantage of yourself! It's impossible to spend the village's money.

It makes sense to rush into the street! He had to get beaten up before he was sent in. What's the use of sending him in? You two have a good relationship and you both know that you don't want to spend some money separately to get a large team. Who can say anything? When we get to the brigade, haha, the death of an educated youth is like the death of an ant.

Only children should not have to go to the countryside.

Your introduction makes me confused. In that turbulent and turbulent era, you buy this way, buy that way. How ignorant do you have to be to write like this?

I can't read it. The logic is very poor and the content is not true. It feels like it's copied mechanically and I didn't bother to check the information. The period novel takes more effort to write than ordinary novels. The writing is too poor and it's not easy to follow.

It's so bad, I don't understand anything, I just write nonsense! ! Poisonous

It's not in line with the era, and the style of female videos is too obvious. Sure enough, it makes sense for the platform to divide male and female channels. You really can't watch each other.

Is going to the countryside just to pick up girls? The author is a diaosi

It's so disgustingly written, and it's so frustrating to have no logic at all.

I don't understand what's written here, why am I still reborn?

Write ✍What kind of stuff? It doesn't fit the situation at that time!

It's so well written, don't write a chronicle next time!

The subject matter is very good and the innovative ideas are good. The writing style is average. He often deals with problems tactfully and always deals with things with loyalty. I feel that the author is young and has weak social experience. Try to modify in this area, otherwise you will be attacked almost everywhere. A piece of advice for you: Saying 100 nice words may not necessarily make you a good friend, but one sentence can easily offend someone. This is human kindness. What you say and do is often easy to lose face. It took just a few words to screw with someone. The reason why I say the subject matter is good is that in those days, ability still reflected a person's value. At this time, ability tested comprehensive ability. Taking the initiative to go to the countryside, making money in disguise, scientific and technological value, and realizing personality charm. These are all in line with mainstream values. More revisions and more training.

You are still so high-profile after going to the countryside. You are not stupid.

I haven't read it yet, so I read the comments first and found that all the book friends said that the bad point is that only children do not need to go to the countryside as educated youths. I checked it out and found that this rule existed. However, one thing you may not have noticed is that the educated youths at that time also included some children of intellectuals who needed to be re-reformed through labor. These people were unable to do the re-reform through labor and were not suitable to stay in the city, so they were sent to the countryside. They were also educated youths. These people did not distinguish between only children and non-only children.

The author hastened to add one more heroine: Zhu Lin (who played the role of the king of the daughter country)

The author hastened to add one more heroine: Zhu Lin (who played the role of the king of the daughter country)

"The corner of the mouth is raised" appears at least 5 times in a chapter