Hogwarts: Wizarding Revolution

If you fight head-on, the wizard will lose. Either provoke a world war, or use witchcraft to assist capital, become a big capitalist, and control the world

Many people overlook the fact that in the Harry Potter world, ordinary people can also learn to use magic indirectly (that is, making spell props and alchemy), but they cannot cast spells spontaneously. James Stewart, the second headmaster of Ilfamoni, was clearly stated by Rowling as a Muggle. He was willing to learn from his witch wife and was willing to teach, and he became a master of enchanted items. His works include the Pukechi Sorting Statue and the Snakewood Wand. Even Wikipedia described his wand-making skills as "extraordinary magic." In the end, he even took over his wife's position as principal, and has always been a professor (not a faculty member like Filch, but a professor). The scariest thing is that he even discovered a way for Muggles to make wands without any consequences. This shows that if you really want to take over the magic world, you will not be a match for the Muggle world. It is impossible for wizards to resist the Muggles' huge and complete scientific research system. If you rely on your blood to cast spells, can't I develop a plug-in magic system to assist you? What's even more frightening is that the relationship between wizards and goblins is so bad that the main body of goblins wants the wizard to die all the time. If the goblins turn to the Muggles to help them get through the initial period of time, and provide samples of magic items for reference. Later, when the technology matures, it will be simply killing indiscriminately, not to mention the problem of the Muggle wizards taking sides. So in this regard, the original wizard protection law was not the loophole-filled reason given by the Ministry of Magic at all, but to ensure that magic and the use of magic would not spread on a large scale. Later, it was probably that the wizard couldn't bear to lose face and recorded it in the history books, causing the original reason to be lost. This can also explain why Grindelwald insists on grabbing time, because the marginal effects are mutual. If the time given to the Muggles' huge scientific research system is used, the wizards have no chance of winning, so they must be fast, accurate and ruthless. The wizards' biggest advantage is being in the dark, defeating the Muggles before they can react.

Originally I thought I could have two thousand points to myself, until I saw the words "signed", my eyes darkened and I fainted on the ground.

I was confused when I read the introduction. The scary thing about wizards is not their destructive power, right? It's about mobility and weird and hard-to-detect magic, right? I really don't understand, how can humans win in front of wizards who have three things: Apparition, compound potions, and the Imperius Curse? Even if the wizards are all reckless, it would be difficult to win with the technological level of mankind at that time, right? Not to mention that the leader of the wizard side is the prophet Grindelwald. Not only does he have brains, but he also knows that human beings are terrible. He can take advantage of the world war to sneak into the capitals of many countries to control political figures, and then weaken the military power of various countries, and wait for humans to think of themselves, and finally come out to clean up the mess? Did I overlook something? But I really don't understand how the wizard lost? Is it possible to fight against various human weapons? Hope the boss can clear up the confusion

The conditions for the birth of wizards determine that in the event of a full-scale war, wizards will lose. Because wizards will definitely split, and in the end the war will inevitably end with a group of wizards fighting ordinary people + mixed-race wizards.

It is a very speechless novel that has great power but is restrained. This seems to be the same-sex version of the female novel. Strength is the reason to be king. I have such great power but I have always been submissive like a slave. I can see the cowardice in my heart from here.

Not sure which direction this book is going to take? The protagonist disagrees with wizards, and is completely in favor of Muggles. Like Dumbledore, he cooperates with Muggles. Like Grindelwald, he advocates wizards dominating Muggles. He is also a terrorist like Voldemort. The protagonist neither wants wizards nor Muggles to die. He is neither willing to listen to others nor has his own opinions. But in the terrifying environment the protagonist is in, how can it be possible for you to stop and look around? In all kinds of snobbish conflicts, how can there be a way out without overwhelming force with absolute strength. The Holy Mother is not to be desired.

When Muggles and wizards go to war, all Muggle wizards are naturally traitors in reserve. Either guard the concentration camp and kill all the more aggressive ones. In the end, wouldn't it be the purebloods fighting against the purebloods and the mixed-bloods sitting on the fence? The Muggle-born Muggles with conversion syndrome fought harder against the Muggle-born purebreds who also suffered from the disease. Real-life example: Japanese Americans in World War II. Chinese Americans on the Korean battlefield. There are Chinese traitors, Japanese traitors, beautiful traitors, legal traitors, moral traitors in the world... But in most cases they are described as "anti-war people" 😜😜😜😜

Author, do you have an outline? When will the revolution begin?

Not bad, not many good books are recommended by this heroine, and this happens to be the best one.

In recent years, HP articles have become more and more in-depth.

What are you doing? Why are there so many female protagonists in male videos recently? Isn't it a question of whether the writing is good or not? Don't you think it's a different issue? What does classification do? Just to display it somewhere? Isn't it just to search for whatever novels you like in whichever category, so that it's easier to read!

It's obviously good writing, but why isn't it popular?

Note that the original Harry Potter books mentioned that wizards were massacred in the Middle Ages. In other words, humans in the Harry Potter world have ways to control or even kill wizards. And these methods can even allow humans in the middle world to kill wizards without thermal weapons, and Us has no stage progress at all compared to the Middle Ages. In other words, the fate of selflessness is worse than that of the Middle Ages. The ending is obvious, a crushing massacre.

In fact, in the Harry Potter book, the first war was between the conservative faction represented by Dumbledore and the revolutionary faction represented by Grindelwald, and the second battle was between Voldemort's pure-blood aristocrat faction and Dumbledore's civilian mixed-blood faction. From this we can see that Dumbledore is not just at all, nor is he a good person in the traditional sense. He just represents the majority of people every time. The author's book introduces a larger pattern, that is, the struggle between wizards as a minority and the majority of ordinary Muggles. The Muggles are definitely not monolithic. There may be doves who advocate peaceful coexistence with wizards, eagles who are not my race. Among the wizards there must be the doves represented by Dumbledore who live in peace with mankind, the eagles who rule mankind by Grindelwald, and a few factions who want to integrate into mankind. There are multiple endings depending on which route the protagonist wants to take. If you take the eagle route, either humans will be ruled or wizards will become extinct. If you take the dove route, everything will go back to the past and wizards will disappear into the background again. If you take the minority route, humans and wizards will begin to merge, and from then on, ideology and culture will begin to unify.

The writing is quite interesting. Lao Deng's temper can only be like this in the context of failure. However, the defeat of wizards is a bit far-fetched. Logically speaking, apart from screening out Muggle wizards, it is really difficult for ordinary people to say what kind of impact it will have on wizards, as long as the wizards avoid fighting.

This must be someone's vest. It's rare for newcomers to be able to support such a magically modified if-line worldview. It feels better than the one without the savior. But I feel like it's hard to tell later, so I'll just observe it first.

Countries should know the identity of Muggle wizards. Just like in the UK, owls deliver messages, and twelve or thirteen-year-old children disappear for a period of time every year and do not attend any school. With so many characteristics, it is easy to identify the Muggle wizards. Once a war breaks out, these Muggle wizards are weapons against the wizarding world.

With the Time-Turner, the wizarding world can never lose

I see that in the comment area, everyone has been discussing who is more powerful, wizards or Muggles, but very little has been said about the book itself, so I would like to ask everyone, such as: 1: Is the plot development smooth? Is there any plot to reduce intelligence? 2: Is the story rhythm smooth? Too fast or too slow? 3: Does the character's behavior conform to the logic of the character? 4: Is the writing up to standard? Too wordy or too rough? Actually, these comments may be more useful to me, otherwise I don't know how to improve in the future. Of course, if you have any other opinions or suggestions for the follow-up plot, you can also mention them here. I can't guarantee that you will follow them completely, but I will seriously consider them. Thanks~~

😭No updates for two days! Didn't you say you only need one day off? Could it be that the bottom is gone?