Super Academic Master

About why I hate the heroine Because I feel she has no quality The first feeling she gave me was pride In the paragraph p1, the heroine became curious about the hero, but her reaction was not to get to know the hero herself, but to call the hero over? "Call him out and show me" is a command, very Frivolous reaction Such a sentence pattern is not suitable for use between male and female protagonists. It is more like talking to a pet. I would think this is outrageous. Does she really like geniuses with high IQs as described in Pudding? Then on p2 the heroine naturally ignored the two roommates who helped her ? Difficult to comment p3 The female protagonist was relatively aware of the male protagonist's talent, and then she directly launched an attack. Huh? Mixed feelings Human beings naturally feel awe when facing rough waves. When the heroine faced the talent of the hero, she did not think, fear, or even imagine much, and then launched the pursuit Huh? ? ? These make me feel that the heroine neither respects people (she despises the two roommates who helped him) nor respects love (she doesn't even think about it at all) It is even difficult to say that she respects talent (when the two roommates introduced the talent of the hero to him, I even felt like watching a monkey) Illusion "This monkey is very good at turning over flower ropes" "Okay, please bring the monkey over and let me see it") She has neither quality nor brains. The only positive description of her is that she is good-looking, which indeed highlights her good-looking appearance. But this makes me hate her even more, this is it? The heroine? If she changes her gender, she is completely a greasy man. It's like a horror story, I don't feel any pleasure at all. I just feel that the male protagonist is like a monkey being watched by his roommates and the female protagonist , coupled with the abrupt appearance, and all kinds of foils to the female protagonist's beauty I feel like the author is pressing my head and forcing me to eat candy Huh? Ridiculous. Then add this name... Don't be so rude when you rush to the street It's outrageous that you put such a good name like Su Mucheng on a heroine who has nothing but beauty, big breasts, no brains and self-righteousness Shuangwen also writes the male protagonist like a monkey, is it because he doesn't want to make money? Was Pudding's brain suddenly cut off? Curiosity

The advantages of this book are few and can be ignored, but there are still many shortcomings. I will not talk about the design of the female protagonist. The meaning of the male protagonist's pendant should not be too obvious. You can just write her as a plug-in. If you can't write the emotional line, just give up. These are minor problems. The biggest problem is that the writing is sparse. I am surprised. Starting from the rejection of the paper, you have to prepare for a slap in the face, right? Why do you intersperse so many other plots? One cool point hasn't exploded yet, and I've begun to lay the groundwork for a new cool point. I wrote a bunch of bits and pieces, but when the first cool point was about to pop up, I was already bored. The most taboo thing about Internet writing is that there is a problem with rhythm control. There is a bullet in the gun. Everyone is waiting for you to shoot, but where do you put the bullet?

It was so fun to watch before it was released, but it gradually became watery after it was released, especially the story of Doudou's second attempt to steal U. S. Dollars from the ugly country! ! I feel that many chapters can be summarized in one sentence, and it also uses thousands of words of popular science + compiled concepts + various explanations! Every time I read it, I always feel like: What is this 5,000-word chapter? The plot doesn't advance at all? ? ? The book is okay, but it's too watery! ! !

I saw the latest chapter one day. I remember it was a top-notch essay. I write too much in my daily life. I always feel like I am writing poorly but I have no proof. Writing for free is not as good as writing for free. The more I write, the better I am...

The previous writing is really good, but Chapter 29 feels very inconsistent with the previous environment.

The pretense is natural, and the reading is smooth. It is a very good work.

Um, why have I just finished reading it? . .

I found that some people are stupid and have to develop the people's view of history in any field. What is the basis of the people's view of history? The foundation of all human beings is equal. Ten people can transform the world more than one person. The people represent advanced productive forces. Is the scientific research field in question? Not to mention ten people, just one million ordinary people. Can your productivity in the field of scientific research be comparable to that of a Newton Einstein? Scientific research is a naturally heroic field of history, because here there is no relationship between large numbers of people and great power. The advancement and promotion of technology may require the efforts of many people, but the theoretical aspects of scientific research are completely driven by a few people, and the remaining people can only serve them. As for some people who say that genius relies on others to discover this, they completely fail to understand the difference between the people's view of history and the heroic view of history. Let's assume a situation like this. If geniuses are not discovered and only ordinary people engage in scientific research, can that promote the development of science? If you follow the people's view of history, it is okay, because the people are the driving force for the advancement of human society. If there is one missing genius, then if ten hundred ordinary people are on top, development can always be achieved. But is the reality like this? Maybe you want to say that there would be Marton without Newton, but the problem is that both Newton and Marton can only be geniuses. Does it have anything to do with ordinary people? The gap in IQ is very obvious. This threshold does not depend on human will. In the field of scientific research, if you do not have an IQ, you are not qualified to do it. If you cannot even reach the forefront of science, how can you develop science? To put it bluntly, under the people's view of history, everyone can do effective work, just like building a city, some people move bricks and others build walls, and the goal can be achieved little by little. The problem in the field of scientific research is completely opposite. The effect of the efforts of the vast majority of people in the field of scientific research is 0, and only a very small number of people can produce effective results. No matter how many 0 there are, they add up to 0. The final palace of personal heroism is by no means a wasted reputation.

I can't stand it after reading more than a hundred chapters. I must praise a teacher who has no achievements or talent as an academician. Isn't this fraud? Of course, for more people, don't take it too seriously and just watch it for fun.

Alas, it is a pity that this book could at least reach the point of being read by a great master. However, it became more and more unreadable from a certain point of view. No matter how good a certain company is, it is just a commercial company. It is supposed to make good products, but it has to go to a higher level. The more you look at it, the weirder it becomes, especially the emotional line. It is really a pity.

I really don't know where this heroine is smart? A normal undergraduate, someone who can't even get into Tsinghua University and Peking University, is at best an academic master who does research. This kind of person can only be a middle-class person. According to the IQ of the protagonist, this kind of person is stupid, and he is just trying to lower his intelligence for forced CP. For the protagonist now, a full-time scientific research professor is not stupid. Do you think her ability and knowledge can match that of a full-time professor? Her highest peak was probably at the full professor level, not even an academician. How to keep up with the protagonist? Isn't the protagonist sick? Is it okay to be with her? Destroy the protagonist's character for CP? You don't have to write a female protagonist, but is this the heroine? Then all I can say is that the heroine lowered her book to read halfway through. When I saw the heroine, she would just flip through it quickly without re-reading.

It's rare to read a book like this with a genius protagonist. Because generally if the psychological activities of such a protagonist are written, it will destroy the genius character, but if the psychological activities are not written, the sense of immersion in the web novel will be lost. Therefore, the treatment of many Xueba novels is to create "fake geniuses", that is, the protagonist is a normal person, so he has a sense of substitution, but the system makes him become a genius in the eyes of others, without losing the sense of satisfaction. The writing itself is genius with a protagonist that was originally difficult to handle, but in the end it turned out to be refreshing and interesting. I haven't seen it in a long time, so I hope it continues in the future. Don't worry.

The heroine was really easy to persuade her to quit. She retreated when she saw the two of them sleeping.

The heroine is a real failure. She is completely unattractive and yet she is written about in a big way.

Booked to 300 chapters Now I can't stand it any more. For me, I can accept the watering down. The point is that the author's increasingly obvious preaching and ideological implications make the originally clear plot more and more "anti-intellectual." For a novel that obviously requires strong logic, such an "anti-intellectual" feeling is a very bad reading experience for me personally This is the first time I have read this author's book. Maybe the author has a bachelor's degree? Master.? I feel that the possibility of a master's degree is relatively small, but I can be sure that the author must have no experience in communicating in foreign universities, and must not have experience in communicating with cadres above the division level in the real world. Many of the contents appear to be very retarded once they involve academic awards and dealings with officials in the real world. Although I understand that the author wants to create conflicts for the sake of the article, but this is obviously divorced from reality. The act of lowering the intelligence of all groups really does not meet the requirements of a qualified scholar I can only say that if you are familiar with scientific research and the official style of doing things in China and US, read this book with caution. Reading too much of the plot will make you feel sick (Note: I graduated from 985 Economics with a bachelor's degree, HKU with a master's degree in economics, and am currently studying for a PhD in economics at a top 20 university in the US)

I was persuaded to quit at the beginning, saying that the protagonist had perfect scores in mathematics and physics and over 30 in English, but he could understand SCI. ? ? ? ? ? ?

What's the point of technological progress if it's just to destroy ordinary people's jobs? To solve the problem of the last 500 meters of express delivery, we are afraid of offending property and other capital, but we have not thought about the survival of the lowest workers. Brother Xun is right, it's just two words that can eat people!

The writing is pretty good, the characters are pretty good, and there are a lot of details. But after charging, it became routine. It was all about academic and management intrigues. This book is a scholarly article, not an official article. I gave up after reading more than 100 chapters.

Why do you need to have a fan base to speak? The heroine is too smart. The writing is quite catchy. How can a heroine who is not even escorted to Qingbei make the protagonist have the desire to communicate?

Why does Xuebawen write so many things about human affairs?

Xiao Su

I drew the male protagonist mainly to highlight his youthful look. After all, the author has said that Qiao Ze is not a handsome guy. The focus is on his bright eyes that reveal his wisdom. (I can't draw anything too gorgeous) Let's just take a look. P1 Qiao Ze has no mood swings and no desire to talk to stupid people. P2 is a considerate classmate (he is really kind 😭). After the heroine brought him glasses, Qiao Ze has a refined temperament (he is still underage).

Sometimes I give up on a novel because the protagonist is not my favorite type. I really can't stand a setting like this that is a fool and a genius.

How can I put it, your protagonist's character design is not suitable for arranging a college girl as the heroine, especially in the early stage. Either arrange a woman who is also a genius in the middle and later stages to pursue that kind of ideological collision, or simply make the protagonist single. It is better than you to arrange such a stupid heroine. Anyway, she is quite disgusting. I don't see any advantages in your plot feedback.

I hate this heroine more and more. Except for the 2 million she got at the beginning, later on she either acted coquettishly or acted cute and held back her, or she just didn't know what she was doing and tried to attract hatred for the protagonist. I really dislike her.

Jiang Ping from Lianshui Vocational School in Jiangsu Province, a 17-year-old secondary school student who excels in mathematics at the world's top schools

The more I write, the weaker and duller it becomes, and the surprise of the opening chapter is completely lost. The hasty ending is even more off-putting.

I'm curious, can a brain like Qiao Ze beat AlphaGo in Go?

This can also be regarded as witnessing the platinum appearance at the beginning and the faucet ending at the end.

After reading Chapter 200, I found that the author's portrayal of the protagonist was a bit deliberate and deliberately unlikable. Of course the protagonist is very powerful, but the character described is not likable. Not only do the characters in the book not like it, but the readers don't like it either. It's so strange that the author writes this way. Is there any reference to reality?