Gou Is Passive in Arkham, and Then Executes Justice

After reading more than a dozen chapters, I can tell that the author writes with great care. But at present, there is no exciting point or dramatic conflict distribution. At present, under the dark shell, the story is quite thin. To briefly talk about the shortcomings, the characters other than the protagonist are very stereotyped, and when describing other mental patients, the character description is very confusing, neither surprising nor interesting. On the contrary, it is a bit casual.

Rorschach will never give up the few for the many. When you are abandoned by the world, even if you are alone, Rorschach is willing to fight for you.

Rorschach, absolute justice, never compromise. It was too difficult to write with Rorschach as the protagonist. When I was watching Watchmen, I thought Rorschach might die in the end. Sure enough, those people couldn't tolerate the existence of a person like Rorschach.

It is the stupidest thing to do fist justice in Gotham. Rorschach uses fists to implement justice, but he does not think that fists are justice. Rorschach is the kind of person who can carry out injustice for the sake of justice. Fists are means, and it is not who has the bigger fist who is just. If you agree with fist justice, you are actually agreeing with Bane's concept, which is social Darwin.

The concepts of Gou and Rorschach are completely different. Gou is a compromise to the status quo.

It would be better to change the title of the book. The word Gou is not suitable for Rorschach. In addition, I feel that it is quite different from Rorschach of Watchmen. It is not as pure as Rorschach of Watcher.

It's boring and not fun, the main character in Arkham is a coward, and it's frustrating to watch.

It's an indigenous protagonist again, so I might as well write my own original version, it doesn't even seem to have a sense of immersion.

Shuangwen is not like Shuangwen, and the literary youth is not enough

If I hadn't read the comments, I would have thought that the protagonist is aboriginal, and the time-travel setting is of little significance. After all, the protagonist is just like the aboriginals, so there is no need to add a time-travel setting. The method of enforcing justice is different from Rorschach's, so it is better to use his own name when using Rorschach's name.

The writing is very confusing, and it's very tiring to read. This is not a time traveler, I thought I was reading the original work

I still remember that when Rorschach was imprisoned, some people mocked him for being the son of a prostitute. He poured a basin of hot oil in his backhand and sent away the mockers. In his memory, when he was 5 years old, he was laughed at and bitten off by his backhand. 17 In the ears of an 8-year-old, Rorschach never compromises and treats villains worse than anyone else. 70% Of the people in a prison are sent by Rorschach. He is different from Batman. Batman is a vested interest and does not kill people. It is of no use to release criminals after being caught in prison for a few days. There is no justice. Is it true that the law is still law? I never thought about changing Gotham from the bottom or the top. I naively thought that I could change Gotham on my own. Instead, the more evil Arkham Asylum was born. The Gotham used to be just like Saint-Loduo, but with Batman, it became Sin City.

The dark novel is worthy of being a dark novel. The beginning actually shows the time traveler having his will wiped out and becoming someone else, not to mention all kinds of abuse later on. It's awesome.

In layman's terms, they are natives who have acquired the knowledge of the fourth wall. It is one of my most annoying characters. The travelers were eaten by the natives and absorbed as nutrients. This kind of eating does not mean that the time traveler has been defeated, but that he has smoothly accepted the indigenous thoughts and views, and everything he originally had has been digested by the indigenous people. I can accept time-travelers accepting indigenous teachings and ideas, but a process must be given, otherwise it will appear that the time-travelers have no persistence and their thoughts are as clear as water.

Am I watching a Rorschach or am I watching the daily lives of patients in a mental hospital?

The advantages are obvious, but the problem is even more obvious. If there is something wrong with your structure, if you want to suppress it first, it will be useless no matter how wonderful you write the suppressed parts without promoting them at all.

If the pain of villains can also make the protagonist grow, then why should he suffer in a mental hospital? I actually don't know the protagonist's golden finger very well, but I think it's hard to accept that the protagonist is in a position where he can't resist. It's well written, but I don't understand it.

Thank you for your reward. I have been away from home for the past few days and have no time to code. I will update it when I get home in two days.