LOL: I Asked You to Mess Up, but You Led the Team to Win the Championship

The author's self-pleasure is too serious. Although he understands that he wants to write the protagonist in a happy and funny style, the tone of the other players' speeches makes him uncomfortable. The plot of selling watermelons without playing in a training match feels unrealistic. I suggest you read this book (I really didn't mess it up :) to study.

Emmm, I haven't read it yet, but the bad placement in the introduction is too bad for the public. Is the author a gamer who has never been tricked by bad placement? Or maybe the author just loves to show off. .

Dear friends, catching up on new book issues is so important for writers! ! I urge everyone to open it every day, turn to the end, and read it. Thank you so much!

If you don't play any training matches, how can you cooperate with them in matches? It should be reasonable to display it badly.

I haven't read the book yet, but I've been reading this kind of crappy subject matter lately, and I'm drunk. If you want to win, you must put in a lot of training. Through training and competition, you must at least be recognized by the audience and gain points. Even if it's a cheat, you have to work hard to make it work. This is basic logic. In my opinion, it is still barely acceptable for those who are old and mature. After all, it is possible for truly self-disciplined people. This kind of invincibility is heresy and has no logic at all. It has reached the upper limit of its potential and is just an ordinary one that can be read a little bit. Why do people always write about this kind of subject matter?

Brother, I guess you will be exploded by the fans of "Song Jiang"

I can't stand it anymore... I find your way of writing a few words in a row a bit awkward. The book is good...