The Max-Level Ruthless Man

Do you need three perspectives when reading novels? I see many people saying that reading novels requires three views, but I don't understand. Since Cangjie coined Chinese characters, writing has been the cornerstone of the entire Chinese civilization. After Confucianism and Mencius, Laozi's Taoism, and a hundred schools of thought contended, my three views of China all came from this. Among them, there is a theory called novelist. Although it is not exactly the same as modern times, it still has similarities. Not to mention that novels at this time are more convenient to read, and cultural communication is much better than in the Qin Dynasty. For example, if there is a novel about a Japanese or a traitor as the protagonist, as long as it writes about war, no matter how it is written, I believe most of us will not agree. This is the lesson that history has taught us, and this is also the bottom line formed by our three views. People should have a bottom line. Novels are communication literature. For many people, this is a mushroom they got on the way to forming their three views. They don't know whether it is poisonous or not, so there is the first approval and editor approval, and this is not safe. I just want to say that today's novels are widely spread and have a profound impact on minors and some adults. Novels are not just jokes, they have far-reaching influence. Whether the author or the reader, not only the three views of a saint, but also the three views of a murderer.

After reading books for so many years, it is rare to find a book that makes me want to complain after reading the first chapter. This Chapter 1 is really shocking. A man was cheated out of 380,000 yuan in gift money by his fiancée. What's even more disgusting was that his fiancée was cheated by man B. Man A was so angry that he took a kitchen knife and found man B who had cuckolded him at a barbecue stall. Man B happened to be eating barbecue with his friends, so man A killed all of B and B's friends. Seeing this, smart readers must think that A then committed suicide and traveled through time to become the protagonist. But no, it was B's friend who traveled through the past, and he became the protagonist, and B also traveled through the past and became a dog in the protagonist's family. This opening really has too many flaws, I don't know how to complain... I hope the plot can be normal later

The author is obviously screening readers in the first chapter😄. In all the years I have read a book, I have been told off by the beginning most often, but I have never been disgusted by the beginning. It's really outrageous! The first impression of riding a horse is so disgusting. How can I continue to watch it?

To summarize a little bit. The mistress spent 380,000 yuan as a gift to get engaged to a female cousin. The female cousin and the yellow-haired scum mocked the mistress in person and refused to return the gift. The bitter master was red-blooded. He took a kitchen knife and hacked the yellow-haired scumbag and the male protagonist, who was the scumbag's brother, to death in anger. Finally, the exciting part is here, the scumbag and the male protagonist have traveled through time? ? ? EXM? This doesn't look right no matter how you look at it, right? Anyway, I feel like the first chapter of this book has an incorrect outlook on life. It doesn't matter if you are the master of suffering and traveled through time. I couldn't stand it anymore and slipped away. Another: In order to comment, I also subscribed to a chapter, Σ_(꒪ཀ꒪‖∠)vomit

After reading the first chapter, it was really incredible. After browsing through the comments, I really want to ask, shouldn't I have to read a book without having a three-dimensional view? I know that many books nowadays are not very good in outlook, but what kind of nonsense is it to let a guy who cheats on others travel through time and start a new life, while honest people are deceived and have to go to jail. Then will there be rapists and murderers traveling through time in the future? Isn't it just for the fun of reading online articles? Would anyone really take on this guy's role?

I won't watch Toxic. Chapter 1 The friend of the protagonist is a scumbag. He defrauded someone else's fiancée of 380,000 yuan. And cheating money and sex. As a result, his fiancé hacked to death the protagonist and the scumbag. [Although I talk a lot, I at least have a bottom line. I will not be friends with any woman who cheats on me. There is no bottom line for the protagonist to be friends with such a scumbag. Whoring other people's wives and daughters. Defrauding others of their money. The protagonists of pornography, gambling, and drugs occupy all. The protagonist clearly knows that his friend defrauded others of money, had marriage troubles, and committed marriage fraud. Still be friends with him. He deserved to be hacked to death.

Report every day, work link https://www. Qidian. Com/book/1037179414/

If you can't write the beginning, you don't have to write it. The first chapter is the birth plot.

God-defying readers, heaven-defying authors and heaven-defying novels. I hope the author has such a good brother.

Is there anyone who gave up the book after the first chapter? What kind of books are there in Sanjiang now? I felt sick after the first chapter.