Editing History, Counting the Top Ten Emperors at the Beginning!

How virtuous and capable was the so-called emperor of the Manchu Qing Dynasty!

What's on this list? Why did Kangxi and Zhao Kuangyin make the list? Is it that I, Emperor Xuan of the Han Dynasty, am not worthy, or is it that Emperor Gaozong of the Tang Dynasty is not worthy? The two dozen or so people above are almost there. Why is Li Shimin higher than Zhu Yuanzhang and Liu Che?

It's Li Erchui again, forget it in the early stage, but Li Erhehe in the later stage, let alone his own children who are rebelling. The Tang Dynasty is obviously a military power, but it also sent out more than a dozen daughters to marry, and also gave away technology and culture. Tubo can be said to be the most threatening empire to the Tang Dynasty at that time. How did Li Shimin finance it? I failed miserably to defeat Goryeo. I really don't understand why so many people like to brag about Li Erqiangu Yidi.

Not to mention anything else, Li Er didn't kill the heroes, he didn't kill the admonishers, he didn't treat the people badly, he chose a suitable successor, and he expanded his territory. As for killing brothers, marrying brothers' wives, getting married, etc., Do you rank as a saint or as an emperor? If the emperor achieves the above five points, he is already invincible, right?

Fortunately, I read the comment section. The person on the list from the Qing Dynasty was actually Kangxi and not Yongzheng, so there is no need to read it. Kangxi, who closed his country in isolation, will be a sinner through the ages! I knew clearly that the West had begun to develop but still closed the country to the outside world, which later led to the Opium War and the modern tragedy of the Chinese nation.

It's so funny that they don't recognize the Yuan Dynasty but recognize the Qing Dynasty! The author tells me what is the difference between these two dynasties? What did the barbarian dynasty bring to China?

As soon as I saw the title of the book, I knew it was created by someone from the studio lj

This kind of fast food novel has been put on the shelves so early, I can't even tell the good or bad.

The Manchu Qing Dynasty also gave birth to Yongzheng, who was considered a good emperor.

I knew there would be a lot of noise in this kind of books, so I will tell you my opinion. The first Qin Emperor, the second Han Emperor Wu, the third Ming Emperor Zhu Yuanzhang, the fourth Tang Emperor Taizong Li Shimin, the fifth Ming Emperor Zhu Di, the sixth Han Emperor Liu Bang, the seventh Yang Jian, the eighth Song Emperor Zhao Kuangyin, the ninth Liu Xiu, the tenth Yongzheng, the eleventh Li Zhi, the 12th Liu Xun (Liu Xun is Liu Bingji) the 13th Liu Heng, the 14th Liu Qi, the 15th Zhu Zhanji, the 16th Li Yuan, the 17th Li Yan, the 18th Li Chen, the 19th Zhu Jianshen (don't listen to what others say, you have to see what he does), the 20th Song Renzong (to be honest, I don't like the posthumous title of Ren) No., If the posthumous title of Ren is somewhat meritorious, then the posthumous title of Xiao is completely nonsense. Xiao is completely the posthumous title of Yongjun. There is no merit or serious sin, but if a country does not progress, it will regress. This is a dangerous posthumous title. I don't understand why in ancient times, Xiao was turned into a beautiful posthumous title) I wrote it, to be honest, Qianlong is the person I despise the most. Qianlong had no achievements, but a lot of his faults. If Kangxi's achievements and faults were mixed, Qianlong was completely a mediocre king. He was similar to Zhu Youtang, Emperor Xiaozong of the Ming Dynasty, and even worse than Zhu Youtang. Kangxi's achievements can only be said to be average, and he had no martial arts at all. What about martial arts? To pacify the three feudal lords and destroy Obai? Haha, this is civil strife. When does civil strife count as merit? If the Three Feudatories were forced to rebel and still be considered as cutting off the vassal, then the destruction of Obai is completely nonsense. It is a model of a faint king. There were only two bright kings in the Qing Dynasty, Huang Taiji and Yongzheng. Without Huang Taiji, the Manchu Qing Dynasty could only be regarded as a tribe. It was Huang Taiji who turned the Manchu tribe into a country. This was Huang Taiji's achievement. The mediocre kings governed Qianlong and Jiaqing. They had no merit and no fault. , The other five were all faint emperors, Kangxi didn't want to comment, they had some merits, but they were so-so, and their crime was that they almost brought down the Qing Dynasty. If it weren't for a good son, the Qing Dynasty would have been destroyed in a hundred years. To be honest, I really don't want to make Qianlong a mediocre emperor. It's okay to say that he is a faint emperor. As soon as Qianlong came to the throne, he put the stall into his mother's house and deposed him. Did he do this before his father's body was cold? What a good son

In the third golden chapter, when you write about Kangxi, you are really not afraid of criticism!

As a pseudo-historical buff, I think it's quite fun to read without thinking too hard. If you look at it with your brain, you will vomit blood.

The beginning is the so-called Qing Sheng Kang Mazi. He will withdraw immediately without even looking at the money.

Can you say that Wu Zhao changed his name to Wu Zetian? Unbelievable

Except for Yongzheng, there was no wise king in the Qing Dynasty

The best emperor in everyone's mind is different. I like Liu Xiu (too perfect), Zhu Yuanzhang (create China again), Ying Zheng (create unification), Emperor Wen of Han (recuperate and recuperate), Li Shimin (the rule of Zhenguan), Zhu Di (drink from the sea of ​​horses), Zhu Pangpang (

Kang Mazi is really unacceptable. Everything else is fine.

Even the emperors of the Qing Dynasty were on the list, disgusting

It's the kind of book that hits the shelves after 25 chapters. It's becoming more and more shameless.

Let me tell you something. The ancients also compared the rankings of monarchs. Before the Tang Dynasty, the ancients believed that the first monarch was Liu Bang. After Li Shimin came out, the ancients believed that the first emperor was Li Shimin. During the Tang Dynasty, many people wrote poems in memory of Li Shimin (such as Du Fu). Other emperors in the Tang Dynasty did not have this treatment. Scholars in the Song Dynasty sometimes argued that Zhao Kuangyin was the first, but it was Li Shimin who had the loudest voice. In the Ming and Qing dynasties, especially the Qing Dynasty, the official evaluation was that Zhu Yuanzhang was the first emperor (the so-called ruling the Tang and Song Dynasties), Kangxi was the second, and Qianlong was the third.

Are the top ten talented women being judged to be advantageous to others? If you can't even protect yourself, why do you criticize it? The protagonist has nothing but money and a proper tool. This is how this type of writing is done. I'm really speechless.

What about this loser Zhu Qizhen?

After reading dozens of chapters, I can't stand it any longer; not to mention anything else, many of the comments on historical figures and events are based on novels, movies and TV dramas. For example, Zhu Di's execution of the ten tribes in Fang is not such a thing at all. It is compiled from unofficial histories and dramas; and Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty In the chapter where he was rewarded with the Snow Dragon Rider, Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty had never met Huo Qubing? It can be said that Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty trained Huo Qubing since he was a child. It was not that after Huo Qubing achieved great results, he caught Liu Che's eyes and was reused. Otherwise, how did he get the title "Prince Huo"

Objectively speaking, after Yongzheng was eliminated, the other emperors were not so good.

Li Zhi, Wu Zetian can't even get in? What kind of sea ranking is this?

😰 It would be fine if you wrote about everything. But if you mention the Yuan Dynasty and still write about the Qing Dynasty, you are obviously looking for trolls.

Starting charging at chapter 25, it's really too cheap

If the history is not good, then don't write this kind of article.

Zhu Qizhen was the first emperor in the history to lead the way for the enemy and called him to the door. The people gave him the name and called him: "The Emperor of the Door"!

This kind of book is very controversial. If we rank it in terms of influence and contribution to later generations, Qin Shihuang, Emperor Wu of Han, and Li Shimin are all the emperors of the ages. The emperor of the Qing Dynasty, only Kang Mazi could take action, and he was relatively aggressive in foreign wars. Especially the war with Maozi. The most rubbish, the Song Dynasty. No one can make the list