I Had a Family in 1980

I want to accomplish everything, but nothing is accomplished. To put it nicely, it's like a three-minute heat, and to put it worst, it's just a nice thing to say. As the author, you are writing a book. You should know that the holes you dig will arouse the readers' interest and expectations. However, you have to wait a long time to fill each hole. This will continue to wear away the readers' expectations. We experience you leading us to complete one goal after another, rather than experiencing you skipping after setting a goal.

It's a good book, and the author looks like someone with life experience.

Overall, the book should be said to be good. Advantages: The characterization is relatively real and vivid, the story is relatively strong, and in some aspects it is still very reasonable. Disadvantages: It's verbose, a lot of professional stuff gives everyone the feeling of reading Zhihu, and the paid chapters are too useless to read.

It's a bit verbose, and some of the behaviors are inconsistent with the characteristics of the times. For example, calling an older woman "sister" is simply a hooligan, and you may be caught. In the early days of reform and opening up, the names given to women were not so inconspicuous, and many titles were not yet derogatory. When it comes to addressing women, it's better to call them big rather than small. Zhu Bajie was asking for information in the bottomless pit of Zengkong Mountain and even asked two female monster grandmothers to please him. Older and higher-ranking people have higher status and have more say. This comes from tradition. In ancient times, unmarried people of the same age were called girls, married people of the same age or slightly younger were called sister-in-law, married people who were slightly older were called sister-in-law, and the older ones were aunts and aunts... In the past, people who were not relatives were called aunties. Only people with high status and low status were called aunties. For example, calling a maid a female helper, etc., Called aunt or aunt. This is not necessarily disrespect, just inequality. The word aunt often has a small connotation in it, and the elder is noble and the young is humble. Sometimes the name aunt has a really derogatory meaning, such as concubine, such as aunt. In different eras, the meaning of titles is different. Girls and young ladies used to have the connotation of being a prostitute, and they both had the meaning of being noble, but the word aunt gradually became more popular after it broke the traditional culture.

When the score of a book you write is poor, ask the author to read the book review and then carefully reread the content you wrote. These typos, wrong words, and broken sentences really give people a headache. Almost every two or three sentences I can't help but find a few typos or sentence breaks...

I feel depressed, let me say a few words. First, there are too many irrelevant plots and they are long. The key is that the important plot is sandwiched in the middle. If you skip it, you will miss it. If you skip it, it will be uncomfortable. Second, the author lacks key knowledge. It is very troublesome to make DC motors brushless, but our country has always used AC, and AC motors cannot use brushes. It doesn't matter if you don't have enough knowledge, you can figure it out just by disassembling an electric fan. The whole thing is made up, and the more you watch it, the more embarrassing it becomes. Third, if you still understand the low-cost electric fan, you can get a so-called black-tech water-cooled fan. Everyone in the know knows that this is a typical IQ tax product that is harmful to the body. The dry air in the north may be better, but the humid air in the south makes it very easy to get various rheumatic diseases. Fourth, there is no logic. Mountain bikes were sold in the 1980s. The author really dares to think that even if you get a 24 or 26, it will be in line with the times. Mountain bikes can neither carry people nor goods. Fifth,... Forget it, I won't write it anymore. Although there are a lot of typos, the sentences are still smooth and the subject matter is okay. I'll straighten out the logic and solidify the knowledge points. Let's start a book and rewrite it. If you don't like it, delete it. Goodbye.

When I read the introduction, I thought it was a big guy who returned to 1980 to cause trouble, but when I saw Chapter 80, the protagonist only did two things, repaired a briquette making machine and resold a few mountain bikes. The rest is just water, drawing a lot of design drawings, bragging about what I can do better, but the result is still nothing. Most of them just introduce some things from the 1980s, and some of them are introduced incorrectly. The black-and-white TVs of the 1980s didn't even have a remote control. They were all knob-type TVs. How could you turn off the channel automatically?

Post a post, no wonder few people read it. This book is full of professional knowledge, but the author has opened dozens of branches and has not produced a formal product. I want to do this today, and I want to do that tomorrow, I'm so tired from watching, bye👋🏻

I can't stand it anymore if I keep smoking. You don't know how cruel this is to a person who quits smoking. I can't continue watching, it's so uncomfortable.

The author's writing style is very good, but he has a nagging problem that many middle-aged and elderly people have. The writing is very wordy, and the protagonist has no clear goals. He always looks here and there, a bit confused, and feels like he is muddling along. The timeline is a bit inconsistent. It always feels like the protagonist has done a lot of things. Looking back, only one day has passed, which makes people feel very unreal. The protagonist should be more dazzling and shock more people. It should look more relaxed and eye-catching.

Five-axis linkage machining center, the high-precision one costs tens of millions... Our factory just imported two units from Sweden, each costing 12 million. I don't know how much rebate the purchaser received. I'm so angry 😫😫😫

It's really long-winded, and it takes more than ten chapters to explain the science of gears.

There's so much nonsense, Rory.

The main plot is unclear, it lacks literary foundation, it is just chatty and confused.

I have read almost 80 chapters. The protagonist is doing this and that. , There is no main line, repairing machines, making air conditioners, making TV antennas, selling mountain bikes in the previous life. Do you want to eat well, drink and live by yourself, or do you want to be your own boss and complete your career, or start your own company to make up for the country's technological regrets. In the 1980s, you can make money in anything you do, Early period: selling TV antennas, subwoofers and speakers , exporting arcade games to earn foreign exchange Mid-term: motorcycles, single-cylinder two-stroke motorcycle engines, twin-cylinder four-stroke engines, motorcycle accessories, machine tools, metallurgical tools, molds, electronic industry Later-term: cars, car engines, production lines, shipbuilding, find a few of these and make them.

I've read Chapter 30, and it's a standard studio style, with a lot of bad content. The protagonist's emotional intelligence is basically negative, and a bunch of 16 or 17-year-old kids are doing 26 or 7-year-old things.

It hurts my head to look at it. I guess the author didn't even have an outline and wrote where he thought.

A reminder for those who want to read it, the main plot of the story is very confusing, and if you like to copy the information, it is seriously watered down. It is not recommended to spend money.

The more I read, the worse it becomes. It's like a monkey picking peaches. It's illogical to write here and there. Do primary school students write journals? There aren't many interesting words to write every time, and there's no coherence?

There were no pensions in 1980. When it comes to provident funds, the monthly salary of two to three thousand was too high. At that time, corporate wages were higher than those in government agencies and schools. You'd better check.

This writing style is too bad, it looks uncomfortable

At least I think it's quite interesting. There are more and more fast-paced books. There are really too few books that progress step by step with a slow pace like this. Come on, it's very interesting.

The skills are there, but the topics are too scattered and there is no outline. One thing is this and another is that. It's like ADHD in children. Things are made one by one, not just hoeing and hammering here and there.

After reading nearly a hundred chapters, I couldn't do anything I wanted to do, and I talked a lot. Narrative jumps, a few paragraphs here, a few paragraphs there

I'm dizzy, the sentences don't make sense, the typos are a bit confusing

Anticlimactic, can be written into the new century

After finishing the book like this, it seems that if we pay another 5 points, we should get part of it back.

I feel uncomfortable smelling cigarette smoke, so I hate smoking scenes in novels. Farewell.

I can't stand it anymore, it's so annoying

Don't you understand that you are ready to sell everything just for one bite? Aren't you afraid of slicing? The explanation is clear!