My Days with the Tyrant

The author should change the emperor. Emperor Hongwu really doesn't need the help of future generations. From the weakest start to the strongest end, one more person is not much more than you. Pure icing on the cake. What tricks can you play when the country is unified and stable? Regarding the killing of corrupt officials, Emperor Hongwu killed more than 150,000 corrupt officials alone.

This article made me understand an ordinary and confident time-traveler who has been jumping in Zhu Yuanzhang's hands and constantly extracting profits. You said that if the protagonist is smarter and taps into his own time-traveling ability, how can he evolve his ability? I also think that he is jumping around to delay time, and the result is to rebel. Who gave him the confidence? It's so outrageous that the emperor can arrange everyone around you, but you still want to rebel? They even took in orphans and trained them, which was so outrageous that as long as they survived in the Ming Dynasty, they could not avoid the rulers. Spreading any ideas was no match for confiscating their homes and beheading them. The protagonist is ordinary and confident.

This author is the only author in the entire online literary world and historical area who has written about the direct nuclear annihilation of West Point College and the bombardment of New York with nuclear bombs. As for the author Mu Yang, well, he has everything in his dreams.

This book has the first Q point, for example, it talks about belittling Zhu Yuanzhang, the founder of the Ming Dynasty, including the Ming Dynasty! 🥺 Also travel through the Ming Dynasty and treat yourself as a foreigner! ! ! Build an embassy 😁!

Lao Yang is here! The blue sky is there! Lao Yang is here! The world will be peaceful

Our ancestors overthrew imperialism, feudalism, and bureaucratic capitalism and vassalized their ideas to create a new China and new ideas. I admire Zhu Yuanzhang for overthrowing the Yuan Dynasty that oppressed the people at the bottom, but for me, it doesn't matter whether it was the Qing Dynasty or the Ming Dynasty. It is important not to have them.

Everyone is crazy. If Zhu Yuanzhang was born in the 21st century, you would only be able to look up to him and always feel that he is smarter than the ancients. I really laughed.

You are still stepping on the ancients, and you are not ashamed to stand on the shoulders of giants who have been around for thousands of years.

I didn't pass by by accident, I just looked at the circle, and I haven't read the book, so I will just comment. I see that the main point of debate in the comment area is the meaning of the action of "the protagonist established an embassy in the Ming Dynasty". First of all, we need to make it clear that the function of the embassy, ​​an administrative agency, is the hub of exchanges between countries. This point should not require further discussion. Secondly, I need to make one point clear: The reason why one party attacks this point is that the act of "establishing the embassy" is that "the protagonist denies Ming as a part of Chinese history and regards the people at that time as foreigners." The reason why the other party defends this point is that the act of "establishing the embassy" represents "the protagonist's resistance to feudalism and the construction and development of socialism." I think the brief description of the second point should be like this. The third point, I think: The attackers and defenders have different understandings of their behavior from different perspectives, but in the final analysis, they are both a love for the country. I think this should be the case. In addition, from the two viewpoints, I am inclined to the former. Because the meaning of the function of the administrative agency "embassy" is unambiguously consistent with the point of view expressed by the former. The latter seems a bit inappropriate. Because speaking from my personal perspective, I only see the "division between countries" but not the "resistance to feudalism". Only seeing "a certain tendency of historical nihilism" but not "an appropriate statement of the grand theme". The fourth point, I need to express my views from my perspective: The author obviously wants to depict a "protagonist who resists the feudal monarchy, especially the highly authoritarian feudal monarchy" Perhaps because the author has written many similar stories of resistance, he wants to do something different. But it is obvious that this behavior set up by the author for the entire story is meaningless and has caused controversy and misunderstanding throughout the article. I have always believed that when a creator wants to instill a certain idea into his audience, he must be cautious and think twice. However, the author may be out of some inertia of creative experience. Not only did he not make this idea convincing and rewarding, but it also made people feel uncomfortable. This is obviously not worth the gain. Therefore, I think that the theme of this book is right, but some of the behaviors surrounding the theme are wrong. The above, nothing more, is just to express one of my opinions: The author made some incorrect and inappropriate statements on the grand theme of "resistance to feudalism". Finally, what I want to say is, why is there so much anger in the comment area? One party scolded Mingfen and Zhu family slaves. One party scolded foreigners and sat crookedly. Why so? We are all compatriots who have been baptized by great ideas and grew up in a great country. We should look at things rationally and dialectically, and never hurt others and ourselves out of anger. Patriotic sentiment is good, but extreme national sentiment is really undesirable. Our teachers also teach us what the country is and what the people are, and how we should love our country and our people. It is good to be full of emotion, but it is not good to point it out to others in a meaningless manner. I said some meaningless things randomly, just for everyone's enjoyment. (Do not spray)

A person less than one millimeter standing on a "giant" that has been put together for thousands of years looks down on a system that has been passed down for thousands of years. I can only say that maybe I am not very enlightened. The people the author looks down on are myths in my eyes. But how the author wants to write it is the author's business. Just like if I don't read it and give the reason, it is also my business. There is nothing wrong with it, right?

When I miss the New Ming Empire, what I want to see most is the Pseudo-Qing Dynasty and the Republic of China

Change the protagonist's identity. I don't think he is worthy of being a soldier. Is he not a delinquent who acts recklessly? And isn't the Ming Dynasty Chinese? I don't step on that dynasty. It's right to develop China. What does ancient times mean? It's not rubbish. What's wrong with your ancestors and foreigners? Aren't you from China? Can we develop? Don't fill in your own thoughts in the book and describe a soldier. It's disgusting, okay?

I haven't read the book yet, but I want to laugh when I see the comment section! Rebellion was not allowed in Zhu Yuanzhang's era, even if Zhu Yuanzhang died? It is said that it is because Zhu Yuanzhang was talented and strategist, so why do you all ask for rebellion against Li Er when writing books about the early Tang Dynasty? It is said that it is better not to rebel when a dynasty rises, but why does it not apply to the Tang Dynasty? In Li Er's time, everyone clamored not to be slaves to Li Er. How come in the Ming Dynasty, groups of people clamored to be slaves to the Zhu family? In terms of character, governing the country and treating his ministers and people well, Emperor Zhu Ming could not compare to Li Er. The result is that the double standards are so ridiculous

I really can't read this book by the author. It's too self-righteous. Our knowledge is summarized by each generation. Without asking the ancients to accumulate knowledge and pass down the books, are you smarter than the ancients? You can be smarter than them at the same time

Please don't brag about it. You can brag about the bourgeoisie. You are considered a progressive thinker. You are advocating feudalism. It's really humorous.

Has the author provoked someone and been put on the line all the time? Is it difficult for modern people to understand that they can't adapt to ancient times?

In the Qidian historical novel, the founding emperors were as stupid as pigs

According to some people, the books about the struggle for hegemony in the Qin, Han, Tang, Song, Five Dynasties and Ten Kingdoms periods, the endings of which establish another dynasty, and even the books that go to other systems in the postscript, did not directly eliminate figures like Lao Zhu of the Ming Dynasty downstream. Shouldn't all these authors be labeled as disrespectful to their ancestors?

If we can't rebel against Zhu Yuanzhang today, then tomorrow there will be only fictional history in historical novels.

I just want to ask if this novel licks a pig?

Zhu Yuanzhang, the first emperor of the ages: I am a farmer, happy to be born in the Yuan Dynasty. I am a citizen of the Yuan Dynasty, and the chaos in the world was not caused by me. I am a civilian in Huaiyou. Suddenly, a violent army arrived and I strayed into it. I, a commoner, used to be in the fields, relying on the joy of peace, but suddenly demons started chaos, and the sea was full of chaos. Since the red scarf demon bandits started the rebellion, many counties in the north and south were destroyed, so the Ming Dynasty took it. Yingzhou demon Liu Futong caused chaos and took the red scarf as his nickname, and he was trapped in Yingzhou. 😅​

This book is actually quite well written. I don't understand why the comment section is so popular? It's just too much powder. If it had been the Song Dynasty, there wouldn't have been so many pressing matters, and the rhythm was well controlled at the beginning.

After reading more than ten chapters, a soldier kept talking about trains! He is even more deceptive than Zhao Benshan. But why is this necessary? Zhu Yuanzhang would have killed you long ago if he wanted to kill you. There is no need to fool around with you here! The result is that after reading about 20 chapters, I still don't know what this book is trying to express. And the timing is also weird. At this point in time, Zhu Biao died. You are a fool if you want to give the address. I don't know that you want to find Zhu Di! This was a terrible choice in terms of timing. If I were Zhu Yuanzhang, the immortal would come right after my son died. What do you mean, you are playing with my old Zhu family! If I don't hack you to death, I, Lao Zhu, will take your surname!

What's the point of the beginning of this book? Mo Ji's battle of wits and courage with Zhu Yuanzhang is so embarrassing that the author can't even write a cool article, right? It's better for the protagonist to kill the emperor at the beginning, and then kill all the way through the palace and out of the capital. This is called the beginning of a cool article.

In fact, we have made a comparison. If we compare the Ming Dynasty and the Qing Dynasty, the Ming Dynasty is obviously a complete victory. There must be some imps below who are dissatisfied. But the Ming Dynasty was able to combine the two sides of the South and the North, which had different languages ​​and different clothes at that time, into the current territory of the Chinese nation. That was a huge contribution. And when talking about the Qing Dynasty, don't forget the 10th day of Yangzhou and the three pictures of Jiading. The Qing Dynasty basically started with massacre to rule our nation. And there is a serious literary inquisition. I lost my mind.

There is no problem in creating the anti-feudal era. . . Even the Ming Dynasty and the Tang Dynasty are no problem. . . . Even the founding emperor had historical limitations. There was nationalism in the early years of the Ming Dynasty. That group of military households were all nationalists. In other words, populists. He really dared to risk his life against the Mongols. But. 300 Years later, at the end of the Ming Dynasty, the nationalism of the past was completely invisible. There was no nationalism in the late Ming Dynasty. The Manchus came. Jiubian surrendered. Wu Sangui surrendered. Fight all the way down. . . Is this Confucianism still Confucianism? ? ? Huangquan evolved to the point where it reached the Ming Dynasty. If you don't move forward, you won't move forward. It rotted into stinky shit. . . . Zhu Yuanzhang is a hero, but. After all, he still wants to be emperor. In the final analysis, he still wants to talk about the divine right of kings. In the final analysis, he still has to use Confucianism. . . . . . ) (Let's talk more deeply. Why didn't the Ming Dynasty launch an industrial revolution??? Didn't the people of the Ming Dynasty know that the assembly line was more productive? The ancients were not fools either. How could they not know that the assembly line was more productive and could make more money? The bottom line is that Confucian society does not have this market. 12 months a year. Busy. Two months, and then eight months. Or make a steady amount of money every year. The Ming Dynasty people have demonstrated this before.

Has the beginning been changed? I remember reading this book a long time ago that the protagonist was originally an official in a county.

Everything is okay, but it's too grinding. I can rebel directly but I still have to play house with the gentry. The author's plot is as draggy as if the kidney function is weak.

I've finished reading the free chapter, and it's just so-so, so I won't order it anymore.

XdmWhy can't I watch his History Crusher?