I Am a Lawyer in Tokyo

There are so many flaws that I don't know where to start. Mainly speaking, 1. Law is still a subject with a high threshold. Popular legal dramas and games such as Li Gou Hai and Ace Attorney are essentially detective dramas with court debates. If you want to continue writing, it is recommended to change your thinking. 2. Since you are writing about law, you cannot break away from the real legal framework, otherwise the setting of "the law in that dimension is like this" will lead to the loss of readers of the target law. 3. Emergency legislation will seriously affect the perception of the work. If it is to be used, it should be turned into a bill promoted by the protagonist behind the scenes. For example, every time Disney's copyright expires, the United States must change the copyright law. Otherwise, this kind of deus ex machina will only lead to the disappearance of the cool points. In terms of details, there are really too many flaws. Let's just talk about the Xiyuan Temple case. Even if it is just a theory, it is too outrageous. 1. The crime of intentional homicide was released on bail pending trial. . . . 2. The prosecutor alleged that the negligent offender and the intentional offender were joint offenders. . 3. "The prosecution must prove the intentionality of the joint crime." First, when the fact of "cutting off the head with a knife" has been established, there is no room to discuss intentionality. There is no person in the world who has been beheaded and is still alive. Second, the theories of inherited accomplice and one-sided accomplice can be explained directly without proof. 4. The issue of brain death and cardiac death. It is not death when reaching either one of them, but death when both are reached. Otherwise, there will be obvious problems of "brain-dead vegetative people can be killed at will" and "people who use life-support devices to replace their hearts are considered dead". 5. Don't make mistakes. My guess is that I watched Luo Xiang's video, but the main legal argument that Luo Xiang talked about was Zhang Mingkai's revised objective danger theory. But in practice, Luo Xiang said that "most people remember that if you can't commit a crime, it will be an attempt." If you want to know more about it, you can search for "Zhou Guangquan's three dimensions of distinguishing between a crime that cannot be committed and an attempted crime" to see his theory of risk perception. 6. Finally, even if it does not constitute intentional homicide. Learn about the crime of intentional destruction of corpses. Killing people while they are alive and destroying their bodies when they are dead, Saionji cannot escape.