The Self-Cultivation of a Sycophant

I feel that the author's thinking is not quite right. The main character is the prime minister's son and the top talent. As a result, he becomes the magistrate and plays wits with his subordinates. This is quite unnecessary. Normally, the most appropriate way is to directly use force to overwhelm people, cut through the mess with a sharp knife and directly strangle the dangerous signs. The subordinates are disobedient and will be killed directly. The powerful landlords do not cooperate and use different methods to kill. In troubled times, heavy laws are used. There are still floods here. Is it appropriate for you to leave it to a game of wits? As long as there is food, the people's resentment can be subsided. With the protagonist's identity, it is not an exaggeration to say that he is a local emperor. He prioritizes eliminating hidden dangers in the dam, appeasing the people, and eliminating the possibility of civil commotion. With the protagonist's official position and the support of his father, to be honest, if you want to kill people, you don't have to care about whether he is innocent or not. Even if you add evidence after the killing, it is a trivial matter. It is pedantic for a person to jump into a trap designed by others and instead follow the enemy's ideas. The protagonist should decisively overturn the table and overturn the chessboard when he discovers that something is wrong. Afterwards, whether there is accountability or other matters, he can directly blame the dead person and wait for his hands to be dealt with slowly.

What the hell is this? It's not fun, it's unplanned, it's frustrating to watch.

Usually this title means a joke, but this kind of logic is self-consistent. The author was arrogant and wanted to write like a great sage, but the end result was a piece of writing without logic.

The author looks so cultured!

It's a good start, keep going!