Fantasy: Why Come to the Emperor Group?

Faced with this, I only have one thing to say, try not to read it if you can, it's so damn disgusting

I can't stand it anymore. I only saw some people saying that Li Shimin is not good and some saying that he is good. Forget it. I stopped watching Ge Ying Ren.

Author, let me ask you to explain what is going on in chapters 33 and 34? As for how to hack Li Shimin? Did Li Shimin provoke you? Can you check the history? I feel annoyed when I see it

Personally, I think it's better not to be too negative about Li Shimin. Although his personal ethics are a bit so, is it important to a Yellow Emperor? Li Shimin is definitely a well-deserved emperor through the ages, and the prosperous Tang Dynasty is definitely the most prosperous period in ancient and modern times. Why do we talk about revival today rather than rise? Isn't it because we want to reach the prosperous age of the Han and Tang Dynasties (personal opinion).

By the way, Li Shimin, Emperor Taizong of the Tang Dynasty, defeated the Turks and destroyed Gaochang and took over the Western Regions. He destroyed more than ten countries and expanded the territory of the Tang Dynasty from 4 million square kilometers to 10 million. In 20 years, the Tang Dynasty was governed from troubled times to Zhenguan. The price of food dropped from 3,000 to 3 in the Daye period of the Sui Dynasty. The population increased from 2 million households to 3.8 Million. This is simply a myth. What is the author writing about?

You should write about the emperors who helped the protagonist create a successful dynasty. Why are you writing about the achievements of the science emperors now? You should go to the historical library next door

Damn, looking at the first few chapters, it always feels like subverting the emperor's chat group, where the protagonist tells the emperor what they are doing 🥵

Is it necessary to keep targeting Li Shimin? It feels like the protagonist has two different attitudes towards Li Shimin and other emperors

What did you write? Are you going to brag about Emperor Sui Yang again in the future? During the Li Shimin period, the Japanese envoys sent to the Tang Dynasty only came once, and they didn't learn skills? Can you read the book before writing? Japan's rise is due to the Meiji Restoration! In addition, regarding the revision of history, that was done by Xu Jingzhong. He would write well about those who had a good relationship with him and those who benefited him. Later, he was reported, and Li Zhi asked the historian to rewrite it. What does it have to do with Li Shimin? There is also the matter of Li Jiancheng. Tang Shu did hack him to a certain extent, but it does not mean that he is very capable. You don't have to believe in history books, but there are unearthed cultural relics and epitaphs, which have proved that his ability is not very strong. Moreover, when the Turks came over, he told his father that he wanted to move the capital. He was really capable.

I'm very surprised, where did the scandal of Li Shimin start? Have you not read Qingyuan Chun by our founding leader? After all, Li Shimin is also an emperor who will be remembered throughout the ages. Is he as miserable as you say? Also, whether Li Shimin's achievements are great or not depends on whether you have him in the history textbooks you go to school, and how many pictures there are. He also said that Li Shimin had trouble giving technology to other races. Look at history and refute me with historical classical Chinese. Also, the reforms carried out by Japan during the reign of Emperor Taizong of the Tang Dynasty were that Japan sent envoys to the Tang Dynasty to study the cultural system of the Tang Dynasty and then returned to China for reforms. If you blame Li Shimin for this, I have nothing to say. In addition, if Li Zhi had not eradicated the new powerful people led by Changsun Wuji, and Li Zhi had not been ill, could Wu Zetian directly take power and ascend the throne after Li Zhi? Wu Zetian was able to ascend the throne because she was lucky and had good means. If Li Shimin succeeded to the throne orthodoxly, there would be no Xuanwu Sect and no rebellion by Li Chengqian later. I am afraid that Li Zhi will not let his queen take charge of the affairs of the country for him, but will let his prince supervise the country. Then there is a high chance that Wu Zetian will not ascend the throne. From the fact that Li Zhi was able to seize power from Changsun Wuji and eradicate Changsun Wuji and other powerful people, we know how powerful Tang Gaozong was. In comparison, are there any ministers Wu Zetian faced who were as powerful as Changsun Wuji? It is said that the territory was the largest during Wu Zetian's period, and there is still some meritorious Tianshu. I just want to say that most of the territory was occupied by Emperor Gaozong of the Tang Dynasty. Wu Zetian only recovered and stabilized the four towns of Anxi. Even if the Merit Tianshu was given to Wu Zetian, I still think it was because the countries in the Western Regions were afraid. After all, Taizong fought hard in the Western Regions, not to mention that during the reign of Emperor Gaozong of the Tang Dynasty, he successively destroyed the Western Turks (657), Baekje (660), and Goguryeo (668). During the Gaozong period, the territory of the Tang Dynasty started from the Korean Peninsula in the east, expanded to the Aral Sea in the west, included Lake Baikal in the north, and reached central Vietnam in the south. Look at Wu Zetian nb or Gaozong nb.

The author is Tang Chao Heizi! Everything must be linked to the Tang Dynasty! Nothing good at all! As long as something happens in the future! It must be the fault of the Tang Dynasty! Identification completed! Author—Tang Chao Heizi! The history is a bit confusing - basically unqualified! There is a saying that goes well! As long as you want to be black, you can be black! 🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭!

The author doesn't understand history at all. Li Shimin really takes all the blame. Japan's rise was due to the Meiji Restoration. What does it have to do with Li Shimin? During the Zhenguan period, Emperor Taizong Li Shimin only allowed Japan to visit once, that is, the visit in the fifth year of Zhenguan period. It was just normal diplomacy and there was no technical exchange at all! ! ! ! It was Emperor Sui Yang and Wu Zetian who sent Japanese technology! ! !

Since the author wants to popularize history, he must analyze it objectively. The hard black Li Shimin's pictures really persuade him to quit. He mentions the Tang Dynasty in everything, and then makes a wave of criticism. Originally, there are only a bunch of books in this series, and they also persuade him to quit. To be honest, after seeing the hard black Li Shimin, he basically persuaded most people to quit. You can have your own ideas, but historical analysis must at least be objectively analyzed. You need to have a good understanding of the reasons for the rise of the Japanese.

What's the use of posting this? In the eyes of black intellectuals, Li Shimin is a piece of trash who killed his brothers and forced his father and his wife to steal his wife. I looked through the comments and saw a sentence that said that the beginning of the Meiji Restoration was Emperor Taizong sending technology. I laughed so hard. It's amazing. Japan has traveled directly from more than 600 years ago. It's been more than 1800 years What kind of emperor has escaped to attack Li Shimin? Why, Li Shimin lived for 300 years, right? Why didn't Li Shimin directly erase Li Jiancheng when he changed history? Wouldn't it be better to just write that Li Jiancheng died before the founding of the Tang Dynasty? Why do I have to leave a history of killing my brother to seize the throne for you? How can we really pretend that the Wei, Jin, Southern and Northern Dynasties did not exist? How chaotic would that be? Why is he the first emperor to kill his brother to seize the throne? Please stop being funny and slander your ancestors at will.

Li Er's fans made quite a fuss in the comment area, but as far as the so-called "Li Chui" and "Li Hei" are concerned, "Li Chui" has more practical information, and is more convincing in terms of historical data and analysis. And "Li Hei" mostly uses opinions that others have chewed over, and can't give any solid information to prove anything (because they think the history books are all nonsense). They can only presuppose a position first, and then reason and reason again. The rhetoric of some of them even exposed their misremembering of historical common sense. To sum up, "Li Hei" at least has not carefully studied the official history, and most of them just follow what others say. Generally speaking, "Li Chui" has much more solid lessons in history than "Li Hei".

To be honest, if you don't like Li Shimin, you can criticize him, but don't target him entirely. You need evidence when targeting him. Let's not talk about other things. What people who lived a good life did in modern times really have nothing to do with Li Shimin. Isn't this a problem of them learning from American reforms and the Qing Dynasty? This can all be blamed on Li Shimin, and I'm afraid it will persuade a large number of people to quit.

Is it correct to criticize Li Shimin now as the starting point?

Japan was founded during the Meiji Restoration. What does it have to do with Li Shimin? He is black for the sake of being black.

Even if it doesn't work after 1000 years, Li Shimin can still be blamed. Then according to what you said, Xu Fu also came from the Qin Dynasty. Can you blame the First Emperor? Just like your family was rich 1,000 years ago and now they are no longer, should you blame your ancestors for not leaving you enough wealth? You are so dark.

It's so poisonous. What's there to brag about about the feudal dynasty? It's better to tell the emperor more about the deeds of the revolutionary Red Army.

It's toxic and mixed with too much private life. .

I watched Li Shimin for a long time, and praised Yang Guang and Wu Zetian. They basically talked about personal morality, not to mention merits. History has proven that Li Shimin is better than them. I have no choice but to ignore the facts wherever I have to. In terms of personal ethics, Yang Guang killed his brother and his father, Wu Zetian killed her son. Which one is better than Li Shimin? It is really Li Shimin's shortcomings that are infinitely magnified. The advantages are not mentioned at all, and the shortcomings of Yang Guang and Wu Zetian are ignored. In addition, do some popular science. If you don't want to search for information, take a look at the praise of Li Shimin by emperors and celebrities of the past dynasties, including our leaders, and then look at the evaluation of Yang Guang and Wu Zetian. From this aspect, Yang Guang and Wu Zetian are better than Li Shimin. Are you better than the figures who have dominated an era for thousands of years? There is also the Yang Guangdao Canal that is highly praised now. The Beijing-Hangzhou Grand Canal we use now runs from Beijing through Shandong and directly to Jiangnan. It was built during the Yuan Dynasty. The Grand Canal built by Yang Guang first went from Beijing to Luoyang, and then from Luoyang to Jiangnan, directly turning a large bay. If you use the Beijing-Hangzhou Grand Canal to praise Yang Guang, let's search for information first. In the past few years, I have never seen so many stupid and stupid people. Only after the book "What Subverted the Emperor's Chat Group" came out, a lot of people really regarded that novel as history. I was really speechless. I also read it at the beginning, and then I saw the black Li Shimin. At first, I didn't mind, but Later I saw that Li Shimin could be blamed for things done by Japanese criminals in the last century. I was really speechless and couldn't stand it anymore. But there are still so many people who believe that reading novels is okay. I also like reading novels and I am quite old. But I really can't understand this kind of treating novels as history. One more thing, who really blamed the Tang Dynasty or Li Shimin for what the Japanese prisoners did. From the Sui and Tang dynasties, Japanese prisoners came to China to study or even spread the word. It was only once during the Li Shimin period, but it happened several times to Wu Zetian, who you admire.

There are actually people who brag about Wu Zetian. Apart from taking advantage of the first female emperor, what other achievements have she made?

After looking at the comment section, I found that no one has been led astray yet. The author is really biased about Tang. The opening up of the Tang Dynasty was not just about sending things out as you wrote. It also introduced specialties of vegetables, melons and fruits from the Western Regions, and the unique culture was introduced inward. Perhaps there were some reasons for the eventual demise of the Tang Dynasty, but otherwise, there would never have been an open, inclusive and prosperous Tang Dynasty. Everyone knows that you should drink water when you are thirsty, but drinking too much water will cause pain. If you fall into the lake, you will drown. Do you want to stop drinking water from now on? The author only said that this caused the fall of the Tang Dynasty and kept silent about the prosperity it brought. There were too many private goods. Moreover, many of the causes and effects discussed are too far-fetched. How many people have died because of gunpowder? Is it possible to attribute all the blame to the person who invented gunpowder? But gunpowder has also brought many conveniences and benefits to mankind? I hope the author can listen to some suggestions from readers.

I don't understand why there are so many Li Hei in the comment area, which really puzzles me. Li Er has little personal ethics, but the scumbags are able to fabricate history out of thin air. They would rather believe in so-called marketing accounts and unofficial history than take a second look at official history. Those people practice historical nihilism, and I don't know what their intentions are. The Sui Shu compiled by the Tang Dynasty not only did not discredit the Sui Dynasty, but also gave a very fair evaluation. Emperor Yang was young and intelligent, ambitious, beautiful and capable of both learning and martial arts. He conquered the Chen Kingdom in the south and conquered the Turks in the north. His achievements were made early. He thought that he should not be appointed as the vassal king, so he pretended to be a vassal and committed treachery. Therefore, he was offered the Empress Zhong Xin, and Emperor Wen changed his mind and took the throne in the East Palace. After Emperor Wen's death, he violated the foundation of Junji's honor and accepted Pixian's death. Now that he has ascended to a high position, he pursues his insatiable desires, relies on his talents and is proud of himself, narrowly adapts to the system of Yin and Zhou, and adheres to the rules of Qin and Han. He is dangerous on the inside and concise on the outside. Wearing high hats and uniforms to cover up his traitors, and removing officials who admonish him to cover up his faults. Excessive licentiousness is enriched by laws and regulations; teachings eliminate the four dimensions, and punishments are combined with the five abuses. Chairman Mao once pointed out in an annotation of the book "Zhitan" compiled by Feng Menglong of the Ming Dynasty: Since ancient times, there has been no one to the right of Li Shimin in the army, and the second best is Zhu Yuanzhang. "If you want to criticize me, use historical data to speak.

Some people say that Emperor Qin, Emperor Wu of Han, and Emperor Tang and Song are not admired. If we only look at the achievements they made during their reign, many people do not recognize their status. However, if we look at it from another angle, they are still OK. What was the situation before Emperor Taizong and Li Shimin of the Tang Dynasty? There were nearly 170 years of turmoil during the Northern and Southern Dynasties. During these 170 years, there was basically no stability on the land of China. The Sui Dynasty, after its establishment, was also stable. Not long after, they began to attack Goguryeo three times and built the Grand Canal. Not long after, the country began to be in chaos again. This combined to almost 200 years of turmoil, the establishment of the Tang Dynasty At that time, Li Shimin often fought abroad. This is undeniable, and Li Shimin's Zhenguan era laid a firm foundation for the Kaiyuan era. As for Zhao Kuangyin, the founder of Song Dynasty, it is undeniable that the Song Dynasty's suppression of military generals was basically the most stringent among all dynasties in history. But before the establishment of the Song Dynasty, what was the situation of the Central Plains? The great turmoil of the Five Dynasties and Ten Kingdoms, from the turmoil at the end of the Tang Dynasty to the establishment of the Song Dynasty, and the Five Dynasties and Ten Kingdoms period in between, the great turmoil for about a hundred years. Although the Song Dynasty's territory and influence on the world were not very prominent among the various dynasties in history, the territory of this The performance of the Song Dynasty was not very outstanding, and could even be said to be relatively poor, but it ended a century of great turmoil and established a stable political power. This achievement is undeniable. That is all. I personally think that Li Shimin and Zhao Kuang Yin, they are worthy of the title of Tang Zongzong and Song Dynasty. Emperor Qin Hanwu, Tang Zongzong Songzu, and Qin Shihuang Yingzheng laid a firm foundation for the unification of the Central Plains dynasty. Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty Liu Che, although he consumed the accumulation of previous emperors, it was his campaign. Let the world and even history witness the backbone of the Han Dynasty. Li Shimin, Emperor Taizong of the Tang Dynasty, laid a firm foundation for China's greatest prosperous age, the Kaiyuan Dynasty. Zhao Kuangyin, Taizu of the Song Dynasty, ended the darkest period in Chinese history. Don't they deserve to be together?

I'm really annoyed by Black Martial Arts Weekly. Have you forgotten all about middle school history? What is development and what is stability? Is this called losing land? The prosperous age of Kaiyuan also had her contribution.

Author, do you particularly dislike Li Shimin? You would throw dirty water on him. I can only say that future generations will not live up to expectations.

Things that will happen a thousand years later will be blamed on Li Shimin. Does this mean that the injustice has its owner and the debt has its owner? During the reign of Li Shimin, the Tang Dynasty could fight whoever it wanted. If you learned how to do it, what can you do? It would be as simple as destroying you. You were forcing him to be lowered. If you can fight, fight, and govern the country, there is no other evil in the world.

The author should be of Turkic descent, and he wrote a book with such a violent spirit. It makes people look speechless.