Marvel's Celestial Master

That's it? That's it? That's it? It's been so long, just this little word? My eighty-year-old grandma can type faster than you! 🙂

Are Taoist priests called Shanzai? 😰 I don't have much education, can anyone explain it?

Not decisive enough, it seems a bit nonsense. To put it nicely, I accept money to help SHIELD do things, but I don't rush in on my own when something happens.

What can I say about this novel? When I saw the tentacles and madness, I guessed it was a Cthulhu plot. Marvel has a lot of content. If you add the protagonist's own mythology system, it won't matter. After all, it comes with the protagonist. You write another Cthulhu... Is it because Marvel has no story to write? There are so many stories in comics and so many heroes, so I just wrote an independent movie. I can't bear to write about Cthulhu. What the hell is the protagonist's only chance after Heaven is destroyed? Originally, it was written about all kinds of lofty things in Heaven, and all kinds of invincibility in Sanqing. I just asked the gods, and a heavenly general came down and killed the incarnation of Jörmungandr in seconds. The general also said that Jörmungandr can only be seen in person when he comes. But then he suddenly said that the gods of heaven had gone somewhere, so I guessed that it would be about the destruction of heaven, the death of gods, and the reconstruction of heaven. Sure enough, the latest two chapters said that heaven was destroyed by Cthulhu... Where is my invincible heaven? Where is Mr. Sanqing? That's it? Destroyed by Cthulhu? Then the main character written in the introduction is very awesome. In the actual plot, he was tortured in various ways. When he met Dracula, he was almost killed instantly. If Dracula didn't talk nonsense, he would directly suck blood or behead the protagonist without stepping on his face, and the protagonist would be killed instantly. How should I put it? The content of the novel and its introduction have nothing to do with each other. I admit that I wanted to read Invincible, and I was attracted by the introduction. However, I saw that the content was seriously inconsistent and all kinds of abuse of the protagonist. Either your introduction should not be so invincible, or the plot should not be so abusive. These two conflicts are conflicting. People who click on the invincible introduction to come in are more or less not fond of the abuse of the protagonist. People who like to watch abuse of the protagonist will not be attracted by your introduction. As a result, your introduction of the invincible plot abuses the protagonist, and is "poisonous" in both directions? Sorry, I was abused because I love reading invincible articles.

Read the introduction today, the results were updated four days ago

Netmap(ー`´ー)

Create a comment thread! Readers can speak freely below this post! Useful comments will be adopted and errors will be corrected! Thank you all!

Stop bragging in the group and write your words carefully 😒

Taoist priest, if you go to Marvel, the end may not be good 🔨

I'll be a good guy Let's start with a God King Okay, okay