I Am Really Not a Brush in the Basketball World

This golden finger is really fucked! I didn't expect to grow taller on the spot!

The hit rate set by the plug-in is a failure. If you can shoot 51% from three-point range no matter what, why bother shooting? Just throw it away and that's it. Scoring champions are trivial, and Chamberlain can't even keep averaging 50 per game. Directly throwing in 17 three-pointers per game, averaging 51 points per game. According to the author's intention, the shooting percentage can be increased in the future. When it reaches 100, then just throw 34 three-pointers per game. Isn't that an average of 102 points per game? So what do you need your teammates to do? One person can win 98 times in a row just by throwing around.

After a closer look, I found that there are many bugs. When the protagonist was doing a task before, he had to hit the mid-range shot. The three-point shooting rate was 51%. Wouldn't it be a direct shot from the backcourt, averaging more than 50 points per game? Or a fadeaway shot from the backcourt. It seems that no NBA player can do the fadeaway shot from the backcourt.

It can be seen that the author put a lot of thought into it, but I feel that the writing style is not used in the right place, and I always feel that the places that should be enjoyable are not enjoyable.

Also, the shooting rate for breakthrough layups is 75%. There is also a bug in this. When you are going for a layup, you just throw it casually. How can you block it? And the shooting percentage is 75, which is not an average of 100 points per game?

I don't think it's wrong at first, because both coaches and players are at the NCAA level, so it doesn't matter if I write it as a fool. As a result, as soon as the names of the next few NBA names came out, they were found to be wrong, because the author's writing style had not changed at all. To put it simply, all the players are written as mentally retarded and stupid, and one of them is selected for the protagonist to lick. I don't think this way of writing can be popular. No, no, no.

In the official game, just keep breaking through or leaning back to the limit, pulling the bar, running wildly all over the court, and defending like a mad dog. It has no impact on shooting anyway. Many stars are unwilling to devote themselves to defense because they still have to attack, but the protagonist has no such worries at all.

You can focus on physical fitness first, and then add skills later.

It seems unscientific that the length of the palm increases and the arm span remains unchanged

When I was in a book shortage, I caught up with the last European Emperor. I always felt that the author's writing style had not improved much. I would like to read the book by a great master. The most important thing is to read more and more.

The system rewards are too specific, and I feel like I can't write them down later. It's better to change them to game values, just like those written by the great masters.

The whole slap-in-the-face plot left me speechless

He only scores more than a dozen points in each game, but he insists on setting up a plug-in for shooting percentage. Look at Mima. Give up, give up.

I have read the previous book Ouhuang and I feel that it is well written this time. The character is strong but not girly, and it is okay at first glance. The supporting characters also have distinct personalities and I feel that some of them have been written later. I really want to know if this book is a brainless and enjoyable book. I feel that the positioning of the system is not very clear. I wish the author well with the above.

Three-pointers are three-pointers. Nowadays, NBA three-pointers are no longer popular. I personally hate three-pointers. The main way for all teams to score is three-pointers. The protagonists of many authors basically rely on three-pointers to get bored.

I just want to ask if there is a female protagonist. A basketball novel without holding the ball in both hands to break the press is boring.

At the beginning, the male protagonist has a sense of familiarity with a popular coach in a basketball movie, but is it too much to go hard with a bunch of homeless new nacui? Although I don't know the situation in foreign countries, there are more than a dozen of them and they have bottles of wine. It's too crazy not to run at this time. It looks very passionate, but I always feel that it is not witty enough. What follows is a plot of a strong man returning to pursue his basketball dream. The system settings are okay, and the rewards are redeemed immediately. There are no tasks, and overall there are no big bugs. So far, the reading is smooth and can be followed.

Not in the NBA. His three-point shooting percentage is 60, and he takes 60 shots in the game, which is not too much. Including free throws, he averages 100 points per game. Don't tell me that he can't take shots. He is more than two meters tall and has a chance in a pick-and-roll.

Why was the last one so bad? This one won't be the same, right?

Did you still play garbage time in the first game? When the team scored 45 points, the data was 15 points and 10 assists, and finally it was 27 points and 13 assists. The protagonist's data increased by at least 18 points. If the score was at 60:30, the data would be wrong.

There is no problem with the fixed probability, but if there is an open space, there will be a bug if the shooting percentage is the same as if someone is guarding it. Without an NBA three-pointer, it is 61%. Then just throw it from the baseline. Why are you still shooting from the midline?

It grows 10 centimeters in one second, and its wingspan is three centimeters shorter than its height. Tyrannosaurus rex

Let's rewrite the heroine. Wouldn't it be nice to write about a Chinese?

I think in a few years, basketball novels will become, the protagonist is in the NCAA, 100% shooting rate

Ouhuang just ended? Is this guaranteed?

I just want to know, considering the protagonist's fixed three-point shooting percentage, he can average more than 60 points per game in more than 30 attempts, is Jordan Kobe a mere hairy compared to Chamberlain?

The fixed shooting percentage of three-pointers is really awesome. It can be done by one person or a team, even if it is double-teamed by five Jordans, it must be Qiao Feng. As soon as the ball is in hand, he throws it to the basket and uses various layup postures to throw it from outside the three-point line and throw it to the basket without using both hands. Just throw it with one hand. How to defend against this?