I'm a Fake Alien

There is something wrong with the author's understanding of the hero. European and American superheroes are derived from Greek and Roman heroic epics, and are completely different from Chinese heroes. What is the hero of Greece? Demigods are those with powers beyond mortals. Having strength is a hero. Others who are greedy for money, lust, violence and massacre are nothing. Good heroes and bad heroes. Heroes have nothing to do with moral character and conduct, they only represent strength. So there are a lot of anti-heroes and a lot of villains in American comics, who can be transformed into protagonists at any time. Due to modern moral constraints, the red line range of freedom, democracy and justice has been reluctantly drawn for superheroes. In fact, it is still the Greek hero model, regardless of whether it is good or evil. So, when the author writes American comics, he has been struggling with whether he is a superhero or whether a superhero is not heroic enough. It is very funny. He has substituted the Chinese concept of heroes. If you have superpowers, you are an American hero. This is a title without honor and value. It is a racial classification, and superheroes and super freaks have the same meaning. Chinese heroes are based on ideology and consciousness. When you do a just thing, even if it is small, like Lei Feng, or even if you fail, like Wen Tianxiang, you are a hero. It is not based on strength. This is the ideological difference between China and the United States. Obviously we are correct. In the United States, strength determines justice.

Do you watch AMAZONS? The famous food special TV series is definitely worth watching. It's worth watching

The protagonist won't become the Virgin, right? I think a normal person's character is enough, it doesn't need to be too dark or too virginal

This author has written so much, but I couldn't stand it after reading the first twenty chapters. It's not a problem with the writing, it's a weird outlook on things. The Japanese comic's set of morals are both teasing and lotus, and the more I read it, the more disgusting it becomes. The protagonist pretends to be 13 and middle-aged. The problem is that he doesn't pretend to give people a sense of immersion. It's not a skill to set up the protagonist to be such a disgusting weirdo.

Summary: It requires a certain amount of anti-drug ability, as well as strong imagination and acceptance ability, and it is recommended not to follow the main character's thoughts when watching. It is not recommended, but it can be read. I have read more than 230 chapters before and recently read it again. In addition to the confusing plot, the plug-ins are inexplicably complicated, it is still readable, and the interactions are awkward in a few places. The author has written 1.63 Million words. I don't know what to say, and I don't know how to persevere. Keep up the good work.

After reading Chapter 56, I really can't stand it anymore. It gives me the feeling that it is inexplicable, messy, and the framework is very large, but I feel like I can't control it. Of course, this is just my personal opinion. Maybe I really can't appreciate it.

This book is the worst book I have ever read. The plot is terrible, the protagonist is stupid, and the fighting ability is weak.

You wrote this book just to get scolded. The protagonist is stupid and ignorant, and he can actually defeat Superman and the Flash. You are trying to forcefully undercut Superman.

The writing is a bit messy, and the origin of the protagonist, Goldfinger's abilities, and the origins of various monsters are not clearly expressed. It's just digging holes for the sake of digging holes. It's so meaningless.

My wife